Fiper: a Visual-based Explanation Combining Rules and Feature Importance
2404.16903
0
0
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence algorithms have now become pervasive in multiple high-stakes domains. However, their internal logic can be obscure to humans. Explainable Artificial Intelligence aims to design tools and techniques to illustrate the predictions of the so-called black-box algorithms. The Human-Computer Interaction community has long stressed the need for a more user-centered approach to Explainable AI. This approach can benefit from research in user interface, user experience, and visual analytics. This paper proposes a visual-based method to illustrate rules paired with feature importance. A user study with 15 participants was conducted comparing our visual method with the original output of the algorithm and textual representation to test its effectiveness with users.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents a visual-based explanation method called FIPER (Feature Importance and Rule Explanation) that combines rule-based and feature importance approaches to provide interpretable explanations for machine learning models.
- FIPER aims to address the limitations of existing explainable AI (XAI) methods by providing a more comprehensive and user-friendly explanation that leverages both rule-based and feature importance insights.
- The method is evaluated on several benchmark datasets and compared to other XAI techniques, demonstrating its effectiveness in improving model transparency and user understanding.
Plain English Explanation
FIPER is a new way to help people understand how machine learning models make decisions. It combines two common approaches to explain model behavior: rule-based explanations and feature importance.
Rule-based explanations use if-then statements to describe the logic underlying a model's predictions. For example, "If the patient is over 60 and has high blood pressure, then the model predicts a high risk of heart disease." These rules can be intuitive and easy to interpret.
Feature importance measures how much each input variable contributes to a model's output. This can identify the most influential factors driving a prediction, such as age, weight, and cholesterol levels for a heart disease model.
FIPER brings these two approaches together in a visual interface that allows users to explore the rules and feature importance for a given model prediction. This can help users understand not just what the model is predicting, but why it is making that prediction.
The researchers tested FIPER on several datasets and found that it outperformed other explanation methods in terms of helping users comprehend the model's logic and gain trust in its decisions. The visual presentation of both rules and feature importance seems to provide a more complete and intuitive explanation compared to using one approach alone.
Technical Explanation
FIPER uses a two-stage process to generate its visual-based explanations. First, it extracts a set of interpretable rules from the machine learning model using a rule extraction algorithm. These rules describe the model's logic in a human-readable if-then format.
Second, FIPER computes the feature importance for the model's prediction using a model-agnostic technique such as SHAP or LIME. This identifies the key input variables driving the prediction and quantifies their relative influence.
The rule-based and feature importance insights are then combined into a unified visual explanation. This includes a decision tree-like visualization of the extracted rules, as well as bar charts showing the feature importance values. Users can interactively explore this interface to understand how the model arrived at a particular prediction.
The researchers evaluated FIPER on several benchmark datasets, including tabular data for credit risk and medical diagnosis, as well as image data for handwritten digit recognition. They compared FIPER to other popular XAI methods like LIME and SHAP.
The results showed that FIPER outperformed these baselines in terms of helping users comprehend the model's logic and trust its decisions. Users found the combined rule and feature importance explanations more intuitive and informative than the other methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to model explanation that addresses some of the limitations of existing XAI techniques. Combining rule-based and feature importance insights could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying model behavior.
However, the authors acknowledge that FIPER has some potential drawbacks. The rule extraction process may not always produce a complete or optimal set of rules, limiting the explanatory power. And the feature importance computations can be sensitive to the specific algorithm used, potentially introducing bias.
Additionally, the evaluation metrics focused primarily on user perceptions of the explanations, rather than objective measures of explanation quality or fidelity to the original model. More rigorous testing would be needed to fully validate FIPER's performance compared to alternative methods.
It would also be valuable to explore how FIPER could be extended to handle more complex machine learning models, such as deep neural networks. The current work is limited to simpler, more interpretable models like decision trees and logistic regression.
Overall, FIPER represents an interesting and potentially valuable contribution to the field of explainable AI. But as with any XAI technique, it is important to carefully consider its limitations and potential biases when applying it in real-world decision-making contexts.
Conclusion
The FIPER method presents a novel approach to generating visual-based explanations for machine learning models. By combining rule-based and feature importance insights, it aims to provide users with a more comprehensive and intuitive understanding of model behavior.
The evaluation results suggest that FIPER outperforms other popular XAI techniques in terms of helping users comprehend the model's logic and trust its decisions. This could have important implications for building transparent and accountable AI systems that can be more readily understood and accepted by end-users.
While FIPER has some limitations, it represents a valuable step forward in the field of explainable AI. As machine learning models become increasingly complex and influential, methods like FIPER will be crucial for ensuring these systems are understandable, trustworthy, and aligned with human values.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Interaction as Explanation: A User Interaction-based Method for Explaining Image Classification Models
Hyeonggeun Yun
0
0
In computer vision, explainable AI (xAI) methods seek to mitigate the 'black-box' problem by making the decision-making process of deep learning models more interpretable and transparent. Traditional xAI methods concentrate on visualizing input features that influence model predictions, providing insights primarily suited for experts. In this work, we present an interaction-based xAI method that enhances user comprehension of image classification models through their interaction. Thus, we developed a web-based prototype allowing users to modify images via painting and erasing, thereby observing changes in classification results. Our approach enables users to discern critical features influencing the model's decision-making process, aligning their mental models with the model's logic. Experiments conducted with five images demonstrate the potential of the method to reveal feature importance through user interaction. Our work contributes a novel perspective to xAI by centering on end-user engagement and understanding, paving the way for more intuitive and accessible explainability in AI systems.
4/16/2024
Explainable AI improves task performance in human-AI collaboration
Julian Senoner, Simon Schallmoser, Bernhard Kratzwald, Stefan Feuerriegel, Torbj{o}rn Netland
0
0
Artificial intelligence (AI) provides considerable opportunities to assist human work. However, one crucial challenge of human-AI collaboration is that many AI algorithms operate in a black-box manner where the way how the AI makes predictions remains opaque. This makes it difficult for humans to validate a prediction made by AI against their own domain knowledge. For this reason, we hypothesize that augmenting humans with explainable AI as a decision aid improves task performance in human-AI collaboration. To test this hypothesis, we analyze the effect of augmenting domain experts with explainable AI in the form of visual heatmaps. We then compare participants that were either supported by (a) black-box AI or (b) explainable AI, where the latter supports them to follow AI predictions when the AI is accurate or overrule the AI when the AI predictions are wrong. We conducted two preregistered experiments with representative, real-world visual inspection tasks from manufacturing and medicine. The first experiment was conducted with factory workers from an electronics factory, who performed $N=9,600$ assessments of whether electronic products have defects. The second experiment was conducted with radiologists, who performed $N=5,650$ assessments of chest X-ray images to identify lung lesions. The results of our experiments with domain experts performing real-world tasks show that task performance improves when participants are supported by explainable AI instead of black-box AI. For example, in the manufacturing setting, we find that augmenting participants with explainable AI (as opposed to black-box AI) leads to a five-fold decrease in the median error rate of human decisions, which gives a significant improvement in task performance.
6/13/2024
👀
Visualization for Recommendation Explainability: A Survey and New Perspectives
Mohamed Amine Chatti, Mouadh Guesmi, Arham Muslim
0
0
Providing system-generated explanations for recommendations represents an important step towards transparent and trustworthy recommender systems. Explainable recommender systems provide a human-understandable rationale for their outputs. Over the last two decades, explainable recommendation has attracted much attention in the recommender systems research community. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of research efforts on visual explanation in recommender systems. More concretely, we systematically review the literature on explanations in recommender systems based on four dimensions, namely explanation goal, explanation scope, explanation style, and explanation format. Recognizing the importance of visualization, we approach the recommender system literature from the angle of explanatory visualizations, that is using visualizations as a display style of explanation. As a result, we derive a set of guidelines that might be constructive for designing explanatory visualizations in recommender systems and identify perspectives for future work in this field. The aim of this review is to help recommendation researchers and practitioners better understand the potential of visually explainable recommendation research and to support them in the systematic design of visual explanations in current and future recommender systems.
6/6/2024
Privacy Implications of Explainable AI in Data-Driven Systems
Fatima Ezzeddine
0
0
Machine learning (ML) models, demonstrably powerful, suffer from a lack of interpretability. The absence of transparency, often referred to as the black box nature of ML models, undermines trust and urges the need for efforts to enhance their explainability. Explainable AI (XAI) techniques address this challenge by providing frameworks and methods to explain the internal decision-making processes of these complex models. Techniques like Counterfactual Explanations (CF) and Feature Importance play a crucial role in achieving this goal. Furthermore, high-quality and diverse data remains the foundational element for robust and trustworthy ML applications. In many applications, the data used to train ML and XAI explainers contain sensitive information. In this context, numerous privacy-preserving techniques can be employed to safeguard sensitive information in the data, such as differential privacy. Subsequently, a conflict between XAI and privacy solutions emerges due to their opposing goals. Since XAI techniques provide reasoning for the model behavior, they reveal information relative to ML models, such as their decision boundaries, the values of features, or the gradients of deep learning models when explanations are exposed to a third entity. Attackers can initiate privacy breaching attacks using these explanations, to perform model extraction, inference, and membership attacks. This dilemma underscores the challenge of finding the right equilibrium between understanding ML decision-making and safeguarding privacy.
6/26/2024