A First Look at GPT Apps: Landscape and Vulnerability
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the emerging landscape of GPT-based applications (GPT Apps) and examines their potential vulnerabilities.
- The researchers conducted an extensive survey of various GPT App stores, categorized the types of applications available, and investigated security and privacy concerns associated with these apps.
- The findings offer valuable insights into the rapid growth and diversification of the GPT App ecosystem, as well as the need for increased scrutiny and mitigation of potential risks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores the world of GPT Apps, which are applications that use large language models like GPT to power various features and functionalities. As these GPT Apps have become increasingly prevalent, the researchers wanted to understand the landscape of what types of apps are available and the potential risks or vulnerabilities that may come with using them.
To do this, the researchers surveyed different app stores and marketplaces where GPT Apps can be found. They categorized the apps into different types, such as GPT-powered games, apps that use GPT to enhance sleep, and apps that leverage GPT to provide psychological support.
The researchers then investigated the potential security and privacy issues that may arise from using these GPT Apps, such as how they handle user data and the risk of malicious actors exploiting vulnerabilities in the apps. Their findings provide a valuable overview of this rapidly evolving landscape and highlight the need for users to be cautious and for developers to prioritize security and privacy when building GPT-powered applications.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a comprehensive analysis of the GPT App ecosystem, surveying various app stores and marketplaces to catalog the different types of applications available. They categorized the apps into several broad categories, such as GPT-powered games, apps that use GPT to enhance sleep, and apps that leverage GPT to provide psychological support.
The researchers then conducted a detailed analysis of the potential security and privacy vulnerabilities associated with these GPT Apps. They examined factors such as data handling practices, authentication mechanisms, and the risk of malicious actors exploiting vulnerabilities in the apps' underlying GPT models or other components.
Their findings reveal a rapidly growing and diversifying GPT App ecosystem, with a wide range of applications leveraging these large language models for various use cases. However, the research also highlights the need for increased scrutiny and mitigation of potential risks, as the rapid development and deployment of these apps may outpace the implementation of robust security and privacy safeguards.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable and timely analysis of the GPT App landscape, shedding light on the rapid growth and diversification of this emerging ecosystem. The researchers' comprehensive survey and categorization of the different types of GPT Apps offer a useful overview for both users and developers.
One potential limitation of the study is the dynamic nature of the GPT App market, which may evolve rapidly, rendering some of the specific findings or categorizations less relevant over time. The researchers acknowledge this challenge and emphasize the need for ongoing monitoring and analysis to keep pace with the fast-changing landscape.
Additionally, while the paper highlights the potential security and privacy vulnerabilities associated with GPT Apps, the depth of the analysis in this area could be expanded. Further research may be needed to thoroughly investigate the specific attack vectors, threat models, and mitigation strategies relevant to this domain.
The paper's call for increased scrutiny and responsible development of GPT Apps is well-justified. As these applications become more prevalent and integrated into our daily lives, it is crucial that developers prioritize security and privacy, and that users remain cautious and informed about the potential risks.
Conclusion
This paper provides a timely and comprehensive analysis of the emerging landscape of GPT-powered applications (GPT Apps), offering valuable insights into the rapid growth and diversification of this ecosystem. The researchers' thorough survey and categorization of the different types of GPT Apps, coupled with their investigation of potential security and privacy vulnerabilities, highlight the need for increased scrutiny and responsible development in this space.
As the adoption of GPT Apps continues to expand, the findings from this research can inform users, developers, and policymakers, helping to shape the trajectory of this evolving landscape and ensure that the benefits of these technologies are balanced with appropriate safeguards and mitigation strategies. The paper's call for ongoing monitoring and analysis underscores the dynamic nature of this field, and the importance of maintaining vigilance to address emerging challenges and opportunities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A First Look at GPT Apps: Landscape and Vulnerability
Zejun Zhang, Li Zhang, Xin Yuan, Anlan Zhang, Mengwei Xu, Feng Qian
Following OpenAI's introduction of GPTs, a surge in GPT apps has led to the launch of dedicated LLM app stores. Nevertheless, given its debut, there is a lack of sufficient understanding of this new ecosystem. To fill this gap, this paper presents a first comprehensive longitudinal (5-month) study of the evolution, landscape, and vulnerability of the emerging LLM app ecosystem, focusing on two GPT app stores: textit{GPTStore.AI} and the official textit{OpenAI GPT Store}. Specifically, we develop two automated tools and a TriLevel configuration extraction strategy to efficiently gather metadata (ie names, creators, descriptions, etc) and user feedback for all GPT apps across these two stores, as well as configurations (ie system prompts, knowledge files, and APIs) for the top 10,000 popular apps. Our extensive analysis reveals: (1) the user enthusiasm for GPT apps consistently rises, whereas creator interest plateaus within three months of GPTs' launch; (2) nearly 90% system prompts can be easily accessed due to widespread failure to secure GPT app configurations, leading to considerable plagiarism and duplication among apps. Our findings highlight the necessity of enhancing the LLM app ecosystem by the app stores, creators, and users.
Read more5/24/2024
0
GPT Store Mining and Analysis
Dongxun Su, Yanjie Zhao, Xinyi Hou, Shenao Wang, Haoyu Wang
As a pivotal extension of the renowned ChatGPT, the GPT Store serves as a dynamic marketplace for various Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models, shaping the frontier of conversational AI. This paper presents an in-depth measurement study of the GPT Store, with a focus on the categorization of GPTs by topic, factors influencing GPT popularity, and the potential security risks. Our investigation starts with assessing the categorization of GPTs in the GPT Store, analyzing how they are organized by topics, and evaluating the effectiveness of the classification system. We then examine the factors that affect the popularity of specific GPTs, looking into user preferences, algorithmic influences, and market trends. Finally, the study delves into the security risks of the GPT Store, identifying potential threats and evaluating the robustness of existing security measures. This study offers a detailed overview of the GPT Store's current state, shedding light on its operational dynamics and user interaction patterns. Our findings aim to enhance understanding of the GPT ecosystem, providing valuable insights for future research, development, and policy-making in generative AI.
Read more5/17/2024
1
Data Exposure from LLM Apps: An In-depth Investigation of OpenAI's GPTs
Evin Jaff, Yuhao Wu, Ning Zhang, Umar Iqbal
LLM app ecosystems are quickly maturing and supporting a wide range of use cases, which requires them to collect excessive user data. Given that the LLM apps are developed by third-parties and that anecdotal evidence suggests LLM platforms currently do not strictly enforce their policies, user data shared with arbitrary third-parties poses a significant privacy risk. In this paper we aim to bring transparency in data practices of LLM apps. As a case study, we study OpenAI's GPT app ecosystem. We develop an LLM-based framework to conduct the static analysis of natural language-based source code of GPTs and their Actions (external services) to characterize their data collection practices. Our findings indicate that Actions collect expansive data about users, including sensitive information prohibited by OpenAI, such as passwords. We find that some Actions, including related to advertising and analytics, are embedded in multiple GPTs, which allow them to track user activities across GPTs. Additionally, co-occurrence of Actions exposes as much as 9.5x more data to them, than it is exposed to individual Actions. Lastly, we develop an LLM-based privacy policy analysis framework to automatically check the consistency of data collection by Actions with disclosures in their privacy policies. Our measurements indicate that the disclosures for most of the collected data types are omitted in privacy policies, with only 5.8% of Actions clearly disclosing their data collection practices.
Read more8/26/2024
0
On the (In)Security of LLM App Stores
Xinyi Hou, Yanjie Zhao, Haoyu Wang
LLM app stores have seen rapid growth, leading to the proliferation of numerous custom LLM apps. However, this expansion raises security concerns. In this study, we propose a three-layer concern framework to identify the potential security risks of LLM apps, i.e., LLM apps with abusive potential, LLM apps with malicious intent, and LLM apps with exploitable vulnerabilities. Over five months, we collected 786,036 LLM apps from six major app stores: GPT Store, FlowGPT, Poe, Coze, Cici, and Character.AI. Our research integrates static and dynamic analysis, the development of a large-scale toxic word dictionary (i.e., ToxicDict) comprising over 31,783 entries, and automated monitoring tools to identify and mitigate threats. We uncovered that 15,146 apps had misleading descriptions, 1,366 collected sensitive personal information against their privacy policies, and 15,996 generated harmful content such as hate speech, self-harm, extremism, etc. Additionally, we evaluated the potential for LLM apps to facilitate malicious activities, finding that 616 apps could be used for malware generation, phishing, etc. Our findings highlight the urgent need for robust regulatory frameworks and enhanced enforcement mechanisms.
Read more7/30/2024