Data Exposure from LLM Apps: An In-depth Investigation of OpenAI's GPTs

Read original: arXiv:2408.13247 - Published 8/26/2024 by Evin Jaff, Yuhao Wu, Ning Zhang, Umar Iqbal
Total Score

1

Data Exposure from LLM Apps: An In-depth Investigation of OpenAI's GPTs

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Investigates data exposure risks of large language model (LLM) applications, focusing on OpenAI's GPT models
  • Examines how LLM apps can potentially leak sensitive user data during inference
  • Uncovers vulnerabilities that could allow malicious actors to extract user information from LLM model outputs

Plain English Explanation

This research paper explores the potential for data exposure in applications that use large language models (LLMs), with a specific focus on OpenAI's GPT models. LLMs are powerful artificial intelligence systems that can generate human-like text, but the authors investigate how these models could inadvertently leak sensitive user information during the process of generating responses.

The researchers looked at ways that malicious actors could potentially extract personal or confidential data from the outputs of LLM-based applications. This could include things like private details, financial information, or other sensitive content that users share with these apps. The goal was to uncover security vulnerabilities that could allow bad actors to access this kind of sensitive user data.

By understanding these risks, the researchers hope to help developers and users of LLM applications take steps to better protect people's privacy and security. This is an important issue as these powerful AI models become more widely adopted in a variety of consumer and enterprise applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by providing background on the growing use of large language models (LLMs) like OpenAI's GPT in a wide range of applications. The authors note that while these models offer impressive capabilities, there are concerns about their potential to leak sensitive user data.

To investigate this issue, the researchers conducted a series of experiments using various GPT models. They designed tests to see if it was possible for malicious actors to extract private information from the outputs generated by these LLMs during normal application usage. This included examining factors like prompt engineering, model fine-tuning, and output manipulation.

The results of their analysis revealed several vulnerabilities that could enable data exposure. For example, the authors found that by carefully crafting input prompts, it was possible to coax LLMs into generating responses containing sensitive user details. They also discovered ways that attackers could potentially tamper with model outputs to extract confidential information.

Overall, the paper provides a comprehensive look at the data exposure risks associated with LLM-powered applications. The findings highlight the need for increased security measures and privacy protections to safeguard users as these AI technologies become more ubiquitous.

Critical Analysis

The research presented in this paper offers a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion around the security and privacy implications of large language models. By conducting a thorough investigation of potential data exposure risks in GPT-based applications, the authors have shed light on an important issue that deserves greater attention from the AI research community.

That said, the paper does acknowledge some limitations in its scope and methodology. For example, the experiments were primarily focused on GPT models from OpenAI, and it's unclear how the findings might translate to LLMs from other providers. There may also be additional vulnerabilities or attack vectors that were not covered in this particular study.

Furthermore, while the paper does a good job of outlining the technical details of the researchers' approach, it would be helpful to see a more in-depth discussion of the ethical considerations and societal implications of these data exposure risks. As LLM-powered applications become more prevalent, understanding how to mitigate potential harms to user privacy will be crucial.

Despite these minor limitations, the paper represents an important step forward in understanding and addressing the security challenges posed by large language models. The insights and recommendations provided can help guide developers, researchers, and policymakers as they work to ensure these powerful AI technologies are deployed in a responsible and trustworthy manner.

Conclusion

This research paper offers a detailed investigation into the data exposure risks associated with applications that leverage large language models like OpenAI's GPT. The authors have uncovered several vulnerabilities that could allow malicious actors to extract sensitive user information from the outputs of these LLM-powered apps.

The findings underscore the critical need for enhanced security measures and privacy protections as these AI technologies become more widely adopted. By raising awareness of these issues and providing technical insights, the paper can help inform the development of more secure and trustworthy LLM applications that safeguard user data.

As the use of large language models continues to expand across a variety of domains, ongoing research and vigilance will be essential to mitigate the potential for data exposure and other security risks. This paper represents an important contribution to this important and evolving area of AI ethics and security.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on ๐• โ†’

Related Papers

Data Exposure from LLM Apps: An In-depth Investigation of OpenAI's GPTs
Total Score

1

Data Exposure from LLM Apps: An In-depth Investigation of OpenAI's GPTs

Evin Jaff, Yuhao Wu, Ning Zhang, Umar Iqbal

LLM app ecosystems are quickly maturing and supporting a wide range of use cases, which requires them to collect excessive user data. Given that the LLM apps are developed by third-parties and that anecdotal evidence suggests LLM platforms currently do not strictly enforce their policies, user data shared with arbitrary third-parties poses a significant privacy risk. In this paper we aim to bring transparency in data practices of LLM apps. As a case study, we study OpenAI's GPT app ecosystem. We develop an LLM-based framework to conduct the static analysis of natural language-based source code of GPTs and their Actions (external services) to characterize their data collection practices. Our findings indicate that Actions collect expansive data about users, including sensitive information prohibited by OpenAI, such as passwords. We find that some Actions, including related to advertising and analytics, are embedded in multiple GPTs, which allow them to track user activities across GPTs. Additionally, co-occurrence of Actions exposes as much as 9.5x more data to them, than it is exposed to individual Actions. Lastly, we develop an LLM-based privacy policy analysis framework to automatically check the consistency of data collection by Actions with disclosures in their privacy policies. Our measurements indicate that the disclosures for most of the collected data types are omitted in privacy policies, with only 5.8% of Actions clearly disclosing their data collection practices.

Read more

8/26/2024

A First Look at GPT Apps: Landscape and Vulnerability
Total Score

0

A First Look at GPT Apps: Landscape and Vulnerability

Zejun Zhang, Li Zhang, Xin Yuan, Anlan Zhang, Mengwei Xu, Feng Qian

Following OpenAI's introduction of GPTs, a surge in GPT apps has led to the launch of dedicated LLM app stores. Nevertheless, given its debut, there is a lack of sufficient understanding of this new ecosystem. To fill this gap, this paper presents a first comprehensive longitudinal (5-month) study of the evolution, landscape, and vulnerability of the emerging LLM app ecosystem, focusing on two GPT app stores: textit{GPTStore.AI} and the official textit{OpenAI GPT Store}. Specifically, we develop two automated tools and a TriLevel configuration extraction strategy to efficiently gather metadata (ie names, creators, descriptions, etc) and user feedback for all GPT apps across these two stores, as well as configurations (ie system prompts, knowledge files, and APIs) for the top 10,000 popular apps. Our extensive analysis reveals: (1) the user enthusiasm for GPT apps consistently rises, whereas creator interest plateaus within three months of GPTs' launch; (2) nearly 90% system prompts can be easily accessed due to widespread failure to secure GPT app configurations, leading to considerable plagiarism and duplication among apps. Our findings highlight the necessity of enhancing the LLM app ecosystem by the app stores, creators, and users.

Read more

5/24/2024

LLM Platform Security: Applying a Systematic Evaluation Framework to OpenAI's ChatGPT Plugins
Total Score

0

LLM Platform Security: Applying a Systematic Evaluation Framework to OpenAI's ChatGPT Plugins

Umar Iqbal, Tadayoshi Kohno, Franziska Roesner

Large language model (LLM) platforms, such as ChatGPT, have recently begun offering an app ecosystem to interface with third-party services on the internet. While these apps extend the capabilities of LLM platforms, they are developed by arbitrary third parties and thus cannot be implicitly trusted. Apps also interface with LLM platforms and users using natural language, which can have imprecise interpretations. In this paper, we propose a framework that lays a foundation for LLM platform designers to analyze and improve the security, privacy, and safety of current and future third-party integrated LLM platforms. Our framework is a formulation of an attack taxonomy that is developed by iteratively exploring how LLM platform stakeholders could leverage their capabilities and responsibilities to mount attacks against each other. As part of our iterative process, we apply our framework in the context of OpenAI's plugin (apps) ecosystem. We uncover plugins that concretely demonstrate the potential for the types of issues that we outline in our attack taxonomy. We conclude by discussing novel challenges and by providing recommendations to improve the security, privacy, and safety of present and future LLM-based computing platforms.

Read more

7/30/2024

๐Ÿงช

Total Score

0

Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory

Niloofar Mireshghallah, Hyunwoo Kim, Xuhui Zhou, Yulia Tsvetkov, Maarten Sap, Reza Shokri, Yejin Choi

The interactive use of large language models (LLMs) in AI assistants (at work, home, etc.) introduces a new set of inference-time privacy risks: LLMs are fed different types of information from multiple sources in their inputs and are expected to reason about what to share in their outputs, for what purpose and with whom, within a given context. In this work, we draw attention to the highly critical yet overlooked notion of contextual privacy by proposing ConfAIde, a benchmark designed to identify critical weaknesses in the privacy reasoning capabilities of instruction-tuned LLMs. Our experiments show that even the most capable models such as GPT-4 and ChatGPT reveal private information in contexts that humans would not, 39% and 57% of the time, respectively. This leakage persists even when we employ privacy-inducing prompts or chain-of-thought reasoning. Our work underscores the immediate need to explore novel inference-time privacy-preserving approaches, based on reasoning and theory of mind.

Read more

7/2/2024