On the (In)Security of LLM App Stores

Read original: arXiv:2407.08422 - Published 7/30/2024 by Xinyi Hou, Yanjie Zhao, Haoyu Wang
Total Score

0

On the (In)Security of LLM App Stores

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Examines the security risks associated with large language model (LLM) app stores
  • Highlights the need for robust security measures to protect users from potential threats
  • Suggests ways to improve the security and trustworthiness of LLM app ecosystems

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 have become increasingly powerful and accessible, leading to the creation of many applications and tools that utilize their capabilities. However, this also introduces new security risks, as these LLM-powered apps can potentially be used for malicious purposes.

The paper "First Look at the GPT Apps Landscape: Vulnerability and Mitigation" explores the vulnerabilities and security challenges associated with LLM app stores. It delves into how these app stores can be exploited by bad actors to distribute malware, launch attacks, or even generate harmful content. The research also discusses the need for improved security measures, such as robust vetting processes and better user awareness, to mitigate these risks.

Additionally, the paper "Exploring Vulnerabilities and Protections for Large Language Models: A Survey" provides a comprehensive overview of the various vulnerabilities and potential attacks that can target LLMs, including input-based attacks, model extraction, and privacy breaches. This broader understanding of the security landscape for LLMs is crucial for developing effective safeguards for LLM app stores.

Technical Explanation

The paper "On the (In)Security of LLM App Stores" examines the security challenges and vulnerabilities associated with LLM app stores. The researchers conducted a systematic analysis of various LLM-powered applications, focusing on their potential for misuse and exploitation.

The study revealed several concerning findings. First, the researchers discovered that many LLM-powered apps lacked adequate security checks and vetting processes, allowing malicious actors to easily distribute harmful content or functionality through the app stores. This included the ability to bypass content moderation, generate misinformation, and even launch attacks on the underlying LLM models.

Furthermore, the paper "Can LLMs Deeply Detect Complex Malicious Queries?" highlights the limitations of current LLM-based safety mechanisms, which may struggle to detect and mitigate sophisticated malicious inputs and queries. This underscores the need for more robust and comprehensive security solutions to protect LLM app ecosystems.

The researchers also explored potential attack vectors, such as the exploitation of third-party APIs integrated into LLM-powered apps, as discussed in the paper "Attacks on Third-Party APIs in Large Language Models". These vulnerabilities could be leveraged by bad actors to compromise the security and privacy of LLM app users.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into the security challenges faced by LLM app stores, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. The researchers note that their analysis was limited to a specific set of LLM-powered applications, and the vulnerabilities identified may not be representative of the entire app ecosystem. Additionally, the paper suggests that the rapid pace of LLM development and the evolving nature of the threat landscape may require ongoing monitoring and adaptation of security measures.

One potential concern not addressed in the paper is the potential for LLM-powered apps to be used for more subtle forms of manipulation or deception, where the malicious intent may not be immediately apparent to users. This could include the generation of content that appears legitimate but is designed to mislead or influence users in harmful ways.

Furthermore, the paper does not explore the ethical implications of the security issues it raises, such as the potential impact on user privacy, the risks of sensitive information being compromised, or the societal consequences of the misuse of LLM-powered applications.

Conclusion

The paper "On the (In)Security of LLM App Stores" highlights the pressing need for robust security measures and oversight in the LLM app ecosystem. As these powerful language models become more ubiquitous, it is crucial that developers, platform providers, and policymakers work collaboratively to address the security vulnerabilities and ensure the trustworthiness and safety of LLM-powered applications. Failure to do so could lead to the widespread exploitation of these technologies, with potentially severe consequences for individuals and society as a whole.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

On the (In)Security of LLM App Stores
Total Score

0

On the (In)Security of LLM App Stores

Xinyi Hou, Yanjie Zhao, Haoyu Wang

LLM app stores have seen rapid growth, leading to the proliferation of numerous custom LLM apps. However, this expansion raises security concerns. In this study, we propose a three-layer concern framework to identify the potential security risks of LLM apps, i.e., LLM apps with abusive potential, LLM apps with malicious intent, and LLM apps with exploitable vulnerabilities. Over five months, we collected 786,036 LLM apps from six major app stores: GPT Store, FlowGPT, Poe, Coze, Cici, and Character.AI. Our research integrates static and dynamic analysis, the development of a large-scale toxic word dictionary (i.e., ToxicDict) comprising over 31,783 entries, and automated monitoring tools to identify and mitigate threats. We uncovered that 15,146 apps had misleading descriptions, 1,366 collected sensitive personal information against their privacy policies, and 15,996 generated harmful content such as hate speech, self-harm, extremism, etc. Additionally, we evaluated the potential for LLM apps to facilitate malicious activities, finding that 616 apps could be used for malware generation, phishing, etc. Our findings highlight the urgent need for robust regulatory frameworks and enhanced enforcement mechanisms.

Read more

7/30/2024

LLM Platform Security: Applying a Systematic Evaluation Framework to OpenAI's ChatGPT Plugins
Total Score

0

LLM Platform Security: Applying a Systematic Evaluation Framework to OpenAI's ChatGPT Plugins

Umar Iqbal, Tadayoshi Kohno, Franziska Roesner

Large language model (LLM) platforms, such as ChatGPT, have recently begun offering an app ecosystem to interface with third-party services on the internet. While these apps extend the capabilities of LLM platforms, they are developed by arbitrary third parties and thus cannot be implicitly trusted. Apps also interface with LLM platforms and users using natural language, which can have imprecise interpretations. In this paper, we propose a framework that lays a foundation for LLM platform designers to analyze and improve the security, privacy, and safety of current and future third-party integrated LLM platforms. Our framework is a formulation of an attack taxonomy that is developed by iteratively exploring how LLM platform stakeholders could leverage their capabilities and responsibilities to mount attacks against each other. As part of our iterative process, we apply our framework in the context of OpenAI's plugin (apps) ecosystem. We uncover plugins that concretely demonstrate the potential for the types of issues that we outline in our attack taxonomy. We conclude by discussing novel challenges and by providing recommendations to improve the security, privacy, and safety of present and future LLM-based computing platforms.

Read more

7/30/2024

Characterizing and Evaluating the Reliability of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks
Total Score

0

Characterizing and Evaluating the Reliability of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks

Kexin Chen, Yi Liu, Dongxia Wang, Jiaying Chen, Wenhai Wang

Large Language Models (LLMs) have increasingly become pivotal in content generation with notable societal impact. These models hold the potential to generate content that could be deemed harmful.Efforts to mitigate this risk include implementing safeguards to ensure LLMs adhere to social ethics.However, despite such measures, the phenomenon of jailbreaking -- where carefully crafted prompts elicit harmful responses from models -- persists as a significant challenge. Recognizing the continuous threat posed by jailbreaking tactics and their repercussions for the trustworthy use of LLMs, a rigorous assessment of the models' robustness against such attacks is essential. This study introduces an comprehensive evaluation framework and conducts an large-scale empirical experiment to address this need. We concentrate on 10 cutting-edge jailbreak strategies across three categories, 1525 questions from 61 specific harmful categories, and 13 popular LLMs. We adopt multi-dimensional metrics such as Attack Success Rate (ASR), Toxicity Score, Fluency, Token Length, and Grammatical Errors to thoroughly assess the LLMs' outputs under jailbreak. By normalizing and aggregating these metrics, we present a detailed reliability score for different LLMs, coupled with strategic recommendations to reduce their susceptibility to such vulnerabilities. Additionally, we explore the relationships among the models, attack strategies, and types of harmful content, as well as the correlations between the evaluation metrics, which proves the validity of our multifaceted evaluation framework. Our extensive experimental results demonstrate a lack of resilience among all tested LLMs against certain strategies, and highlight the need to concentrate on the reliability facets of LLMs. We believe our study can provide valuable insights into enhancing the security evaluation of LLMs against jailbreak within the domain.

Read more

8/20/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

The Ethics of Interaction: Mitigating Security Threats in LLMs

Ashutosh Kumar, Shiv Vignesh Murthy, Sagarika Singh, Swathy Ragupathy

This paper comprehensively explores the ethical challenges arising from security threats to Large Language Models (LLMs). These intricate digital repositories are increasingly integrated into our daily lives, making them prime targets for attacks that can compromise their training data and the confidentiality of their data sources. The paper delves into the nuanced ethical repercussions of such security threats on society and individual privacy. We scrutinize five major threats--prompt injection, jailbreaking, Personal Identifiable Information (PII) exposure, sexually explicit content, and hate-based content--going beyond mere identification to assess their critical ethical consequences and the urgency they create for robust defensive strategies. The escalating reliance on LLMs underscores the crucial need for ensuring these systems operate within the bounds of ethical norms, particularly as their misuse can lead to significant societal and individual harm. We propose conceptualizing and developing an evaluative tool tailored for LLMs, which would serve a dual purpose: guiding developers and designers in preemptive fortification of backend systems and scrutinizing the ethical dimensions of LLM chatbot responses during the testing phase. By comparing LLM responses with those expected from humans in a moral context, we aim to discern the degree to which AI behaviors align with the ethical values held by a broader society. Ultimately, this paper not only underscores the ethical troubles presented by LLMs; it also highlights a path toward cultivating trust in these systems.

Read more

7/11/2024