Fostering Human Learning in Sequential Decision-Making: Understanding the Role of Evaluative Feedback
0
š¶
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This study investigates how evaluative feedback from AI-driven tutoring systems impacts human decision-making and skill development in sequential tasks.
- The researchers conducted experiments using Amazon Mechanical Turk, where participants solved the Tower of Hanoi puzzle and received AI-generated feedback.
- The study examines the effect of this feedback on learning and skill transfer to related tasks, as well as the implicit human reward structure that guides decision-making.
- Computational models were also explored to understand how people incorporate evaluative feedback into their decision-making processes.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores how feedback from AI tutoring systems affects how humans learn and make decisions, particularly in sequential tasks. The researchers had participants solve a puzzle called the Tower of Hanoi, and gave them feedback generated by an AI system as they worked on it. They looked at how this feedback impacted the participants' learning and their ability to apply what they learned to similar tasks.
The researchers also examined the underlying reasons behind how humans make decisions when they receive this kind of feedback. They used a technique called maximum entropy inverse reinforcement learning to analyze the "reward structure" - the goals and motivations - that guide human decision-making in these situations.
Finally, the researchers explored different computational models to understand more deeply how people incorporate evaluative feedback into their decision-making process. The goal was to gain insights that can help improve the design of AI tutoring systems to better support human learning and decision-making.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted experiments where participants on Amazon Mechanical Turk solved the Tower of Hanoi puzzle, a classic sequential decision-making task. During the task, participants received AI-generated feedback on their performance.
The researchers examined how this feedback affected the participants' learning and their ability to transfer those skills to related tasks. They used maximum entropy inverse reinforcement learning to analyze the implicit human reward structure that guides decision-making in the presence of evaluative feedback.
Additionally, the researchers explored various computational models to understand how people incorporate evaluative feedback into their decision-making processes. This included looking at how feedback affects the structure and organization of the learning experience, compared to learning without feedback.
The findings suggest that humans perceive evaluative feedback as indicative of their long-term strategic success, which aids in skill acquisition and transfer in sequential decision-making tasks. The results also indicate that evaluative feedback fosters a more structured and organized learning experience, compared to learning without feedback. However, the researchers found that providing intermediate goals alone does not significantly enhance human learning outcomes.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into how evaluative feedback from AI-driven tutoring systems can impact human decision-making and skill development. The experimental design and use of maximum entropy inverse reinforcement learning offer a rigorous approach to analyzing the underlying human decision-making processes.
One potential limitation is the use of the Tower of Hanoi puzzle, which may not fully capture the complexity of real-world sequential decision-making tasks. Additional research using more diverse and realistic tasks could further validate the findings.
The paper also does not explore the potential effects of haptic feedback on human decision-making and learning, which could be an interesting avenue for future research. Incorporating multimodal feedback, including both visual and tactile cues, may lead to enhanced learning outcomes.
Overall, the study provides valuable insights that can inform the design of more effective AI-driven tutoring systems, helping to better support human learning and decision-making in a variety of educational and training contexts.
Conclusion
This research highlights the importance of understanding the impact of evaluative feedback on human decision-making and skill development in sequential tasks. The findings suggest that providing appropriate feedback from AI-driven tutoring systems can significantly aid in skill acquisition and transfer, as well as foster a more structured and organized learning experience.
The insights gained from this study can inform the design of more effective AI tutoring systems that better support human learning and decision-making in a wide range of educational and training contexts, such as cognitive rehabilitation, STEM skill acquisition, and coaching games like chess.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š¶
0
Fostering Human Learning in Sequential Decision-Making: Understanding the Role of Evaluative Feedback
Piyush Gupta, Subir Biswas, Vaibhav Srivastava
Cognitive rehabilitation, STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) skill acquisition, and coaching games such as chess often require tutoring decision-making strategies. The advancement of AI-driven tutoring systems for facilitating human learning requires an understanding of the impact of evaluative feedback on human decision-making and skill development. To this end, we conduct human experiments using Amazon Mechanical Turk to study the influence of evaluative feedback on human decision-making in sequential tasks. In these experiments, participants solve the Tower of Hanoi puzzle and receive AI-generated feedback while solving it. We examine how this feedback affects their learning and skill transfer to related tasks. Additionally, treating humans as noisy optimal agents, we employ maximum entropy inverse reinforcement learning to analyze the effect of feedback on the implicit human reward structure that guides their decision making. Lastly, we explore various computational models to understand how people incorporate evaluative feedback into their decision-making processes. Our findings underscore that humans perceive evaluative feedback as indicative of their long-term strategic success, thus aiding in skill acquisition and transfer in sequential decision-making tasks. Moreover, we demonstrate that evaluative feedback fosters a more structured and organized learning experience compared to learning without feedback. Furthermore, our results indicate that providing intermediate goals alone does not significantly enhance human learning outcomes.
Read more5/7/2024
0
Off-Policy Evaluation from Logged Human Feedback
Aniruddha Bhargava, Lalit Jain, Branislav Kveton, Ge Liu, Subhojyoti Mukherjee
Learning from human feedback has been central to recent advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning. Since the collection of human feedback is costly, a natural question to ask is if the new feedback always needs to collected. Or could we evaluate a new model with the human feedback on responses of another model? This motivates us to study off-policy evaluation from logged human feedback. We formalize the problem, propose both model-based and model-free estimators for policy values, and show how to optimize them. We analyze unbiasedness of our estimators and evaluate them empirically. Our estimators can predict the absolute values of evaluated policies, rank them, and be optimized.
Read more6/17/2024
š£ļø
0
Decision Theoretic Foundations for Experiments Evaluating Human Decisions
Jessica Hullman, Alex Kale, Jason Hartline
How well people use information displays to make decisions is of primary interest in human-centered AI, model explainability, data visualization, and related areas. However, what constitutes a decision problem, and what is required for a study to establish that human decisions could be improved remain open to speculation. We propose a widely applicable definition of a decision problem synthesized from statistical decision theory and information economics as a standard for establishing when human decisions can be improved in HCI. We argue that to attribute loss in human performance to forms of bias, an experiment must provide participants with the information that a rational agent would need to identify the utility-maximizing decision. As a demonstration, we evaluate the extent to which recent evaluations of decision-making from the literature on AI-assisted decisions achieve these criteria. We find that only 10 (26%) of 39 studies that claim to identify biased behavior present participants with sufficient information to characterize their behavior as deviating from good decision-making in at least one treatment condition. We motivate the value of studying well-defined decision problems by describing a characterization of performance losses they allow us to conceive. In contrast, the ambiguities of a poorly communicated decision problem preclude normative interpretation. We conclude with recommendations for practice.
Read more9/17/2024
š
0
A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Timo Kaufmann, Paul Weng, Viktor Bengs, Eyke Hullermeier
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a variant of reinforcement learning (RL) that learns from human feedback instead of relying on an engineered reward function. Building on prior work on the related setting of preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL), it stands at the intersection of artificial intelligence and human-computer interaction. This positioning offers a promising avenue to enhance the performance and adaptability of intelligent systems while also improving the alignment of their objectives with human values. The training of large language models (LLMs) has impressively demonstrated this potential in recent years, where RLHF played a decisive role in directing the model's capabilities toward human objectives. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the fundamentals of RLHF, exploring the intricate dynamics between RL agents and human input. While recent focus has been on RLHF for LLMs, our survey adopts a broader perspective, examining the diverse applications and wide-ranging impact of the technique. We delve into the core principles that underpin RLHF, shedding light on the symbiotic relationship between algorithms and human feedback, and discuss the main research trends in the field. By synthesizing the current landscape of RLHF research, this article aims to provide researchers as well as practitioners with a comprehensive understanding of this rapidly growing field of research.
Read more5/1/2024