On the Foundations of Shortcut Learning

Read original: arXiv:2310.16228 - Published 7/15/2024 by Katherine L. Hermann, Hossein Mobahi, Thomas Fel, Michael C. Mozer

🎯

Overview

Deep learning models can identify a wide range of features from data
The features a model uses depend on both how predictive the feature is of the training labels, and how easily the feature can be extracted from the inputs
Prior research has found that models sometimes prioritize less predictive but more easily accessible features, a phenomenon known as "shortcut learning"
This paper tests hypotheses about which input properties make features more available to models, and how predictivity and availability interact to shape model behavior

Plain English Explanation

Deep learning models are incredibly powerful at finding patterns in data. However, the specific features a model decides to focus on can be influenced by factors beyond just how well they predict the target labels. One important factor is availability - how easily a particular feature can be extracted from the input data.

Previous research has found examples where models prioritize more available but less predictive features, a tendency known as "shortcut learning." For instance, a model might focus more on the background texture of an image rather than the shapes of the main objects, even though the object shapes are more informative for the task.

In this paper, the researchers systematically investigate which input properties make features more available to models, and how this interacts with feature predictivity to shape model behavior. They create synthetic datasets where they can precisely control the predictivity and availability of two latent features, and then observe how different model architectures utilize those features.

The key finding is that while simple linear models are relatively unbiased, adding just a single hidden layer with nonlinearities like ReLUs or Tanh functions introduces a significant bias towards the more available but less predictive "shortcut" feature. This aligns with a theoretical account based on the Neural Tangent Kernel.

The researchers also explore how these dynamics play out in more naturalistic datasets, discovering ways to manipulate feature availability that increase models' reliance on shortcuts. Overall, the propensity for deep nonlinear models to prioritize accessible but suboptimal features appears to be a fundamental characteristic that deserves systematic study given its implications for how AI systems solve tasks.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by noting that deep learning models can extract a rich set of features from data, but the specific features used depend on both predictivity (how reliably a feature indicates the training labels) and availability (how easily the feature can be extracted from the inputs).

Prior work on "shortcut learning" has observed cases where models prioritize less predictive but more accessible features, such as focusing on image backgrounds rather than foreground objects. To systematically investigate this, the researchers construct a minimal generative framework for creating synthetic classification datasets. These datasets have two latent features that vary in both predictivity and factors hypothesized to influence availability.

The key experiments involve training different model architectures on these datasets and quantifying each model's "shortcut bias" - its over-reliance on the more available but less predictive "shortcut" feature. The results show that while linear models are relatively unbiased, introducing a single hidden layer with nonlinearities like ReLUs or Tanh functions yields a significant bias towards the shortcut feature.

This empirical finding aligns with a theoretical analysis based on the Neural Tangent Kernel, which suggests that the addition of a single nonlinear hidden layer can make models prone to prioritizing simpler, more available features.

Additionally, the researchers explore how these dynamics play out in more naturalistic datasets, discovering ways to manipulate feature availability that increase models' degree of shortcut bias. Overall, the paper argues that the tendency for deep nonlinear architectures to privilege accessible but suboptimal features is a fundamental characteristic that warrants systematic study given its implications for how AI systems solve tasks.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling and systematic investigation of how the interplay between feature predictivity and availability can shape the behavior of deep learning models. The use of a minimal, explicit generative framework to control these factors is a particular strength, as it allows the researchers to isolate and study the mechanisms at play.

One potential limitation is the focus on relatively simple, synthetic datasets. While this approach enables precise experimental control, it remains to be seen how well the findings generalize to more complex, real-world datasets. The researchers do attempt to address this by exploring the dynamics in naturalistic settings, but further validation on a broader range of tasks and domains would strengthen the conclusions.

Additionally, while the paper discusses potential theoretical explanations for the observed biases, such as the role of the Neural Tangent Kernel, there may be other relevant factors at play that are not fully accounted for. Deeper investigations into the underlying mathematical and architectural reasons for these biases could lead to further insights.

Overall, this work makes a valuable contribution to our understanding of the fundamental characteristics of deep learning models and the factors that influence their feature learning. By shedding light on the interplay between predictivity and availability, the researchers have laid the groundwork for further exploration into developing more robust and debiased learning systems.

Conclusion

This paper investigates how the interplay between feature predictivity and availability shapes the behavior of deep learning models, with a focus on the phenomenon of "shortcut learning." The researchers create a minimal generative framework to systematically study these dynamics, finding that while linear models are relatively unbiased, the addition of a single hidden layer with nonlinearities can introduce a significant bias towards more accessible but less predictive features.

These findings align with theoretical accounts based on the Neural Tangent Kernel, and the researchers also explore how similar dynamics play out in more naturalistic datasets. Overall, the propensity for deep nonlinear architectures to prioritize available but suboptimal features appears to be a fundamental characteristic that warrants further study given its implications for how AI systems solve tasks and the potential need for debiasing techniques.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🎯

On the Foundations of Shortcut Learning

Katherine L. Hermann, Hossein Mobahi, Thomas Fel, Michael C. Mozer

Deep-learning models can extract a rich assortment of features from data. Which features a model uses depends not only on emph{predictivity} -- how reliably a feature indicates training-set labels -- but also on emph{availability} -- how easily the feature can be extracted from inputs. The literature on shortcut learning has noted examples in which models privilege one feature over another, for example texture over shape and image backgrounds over foreground objects. Here, we test hypotheses about which input properties are more available to a model, and systematically study how predictivity and availability interact to shape models' feature use. We construct a minimal, explicit generative framework for synthesizing classification datasets with two latent features that vary in predictivity and in factors we hypothesize to relate to availability, and we quantify a model's shortcut bias -- its over-reliance on the shortcut (more available, less predictive) feature at the expense of the core (less available, more predictive) feature. We find that linear models are relatively unbiased, but introducing a single hidden layer with ReLU or Tanh units yields a bias. Our empirical findings are consistent with a theoretical account based on Neural Tangent Kernels. Finally, we study how models used in practice trade off predictivity and availability in naturalistic datasets, discovering availability manipulations which increase models' degree of shortcut bias. Taken together, these findings suggest that the propensity to learn shortcut features is a fundamental characteristic of deep nonlinear architectures warranting systematic study given its role in shaping how models solve tasks.

7/15/2024

Navigate Beyond Shortcuts: Debiased Learning through the Lens of Neural Collapse

Yining Wang, Junjie Sun, Chenyue Wang, Mi Zhang, Min Yang

Recent studies have noted an intriguing phenomenon termed Neural Collapse, that is, when the neural networks establish the right correlation between feature spaces and the training targets, their last-layer features, together with the classifier weights, will collapse into a stable and symmetric structure. In this paper, we extend the investigation of Neural Collapse to the biased datasets with imbalanced attributes. We observe that models will easily fall into the pitfall of shortcut learning and form a biased, non-collapsed feature space at the early period of training, which is hard to reverse and limits the generalization capability. To tackle the root cause of biased classification, we follow the recent inspiration of prime training, and propose an avoid-shortcut learning framework without additional training complexity. With well-designed shortcut primes based on Neural Collapse structure, the models are encouraged to skip the pursuit of simple shortcuts and naturally capture the intrinsic correlations. Experimental results demonstrate that our method induces better convergence properties during training, and achieves state-of-the-art generalization performance on both synthetic and real-world biased datasets.

5/10/2024

Demonstrating and Reducing Shortcuts in Vision-Language Representation Learning

Maurits Bleeker, Mariya Hendriksen, Andrew Yates, Maarten de Rijke

Vision-language models (VLMs) mainly rely on contrastive training to learn general-purpose representations of images and captions. We focus on the situation when one image is associated with several captions, each caption containing both information shared among all captions and unique information per caption about the scene depicted in the image. In such cases, it is unclear whether contrastive losses are sufficient for learning task-optimal representations that contain all the information provided by the captions or whether the contrastive learning setup encourages the learning of a simple shortcut that minimizes contrastive loss. We introduce synthetic shortcuts for vision-language: a training and evaluation framework where we inject synthetic shortcuts into image-text data. We show that contrastive VLMs trained from scratch or fine-tuned with data containing these synthetic shortcuts mainly learn features that represent the shortcut. Hence, contrastive losses are not sufficient to learn task-optimal representations, i.e., representations that contain all task-relevant information shared between the image and associated captions. We examine two methods to reduce shortcut learning in our training and evaluation framework: (i) latent target decoding and (ii) implicit feature modification. We show empirically that both methods improve performance on the evaluation task, but only partly reduce shortcut learning when training and evaluating with our shortcut learning framework. Hence, we show the difficulty and challenge of our shortcut learning framework for contrastive vision-language representation learning.

8/2/2024

✨

Learned feature representations are biased by complexity, learning order, position, and more

Andrew Kyle Lampinen, Stephanie C. Y. Chan, Katherine Hermann

Representation learning, and interpreting learned representations, are key areas of focus in machine learning and neuroscience. Both fields generally use representations as a means to understand or improve a system's computations. In this work, however, we explore surprising dissociations between representation and computation that may pose challenges for such efforts. We create datasets in which we attempt to match the computational role that different features play, while manipulating other properties of the features or the data. We train various deep learning architectures to compute these multiple abstract features about their inputs. We find that their learned feature representations are systematically biased towards representing some features more strongly than others, depending upon extraneous properties such as feature complexity, the order in which features are learned, and the distribution of features over the inputs. For example, features that are simpler to compute or learned first tend to be represented more strongly and densely than features that are more complex or learned later, even if all features are learned equally well. We also explore how these biases are affected by architectures, optimizers, and training regimes (e.g., in transformers, features decoded earlier in the output sequence also tend to be represented more strongly). Our results help to characterize the inductive biases of gradient-based representation learning. These results also highlight a key challenge for interpretability $-$ or for comparing the representations of models and brains $-$ disentangling extraneous biases from the computationally important aspects of a system's internal representations.

6/7/2024