Friedkin-Johnsen Model for Opinion Dynamics on Signed Graphs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents the Friedkin-Johnsen model for studying opinion dynamics on signed social networks.
- The model examines how individuals' opinions evolve over time based on their initial opinions and the opinions of their social connections, which can be either positive or negative.
- The research explores how network structure and the distribution of positive and negative connections impact opinion convergence and polarization.
Plain English Explanation
The Friedkin-Johnsen model looks at how people's opinions change over time in a social network. In this model, people start with their own initial opinions, but then their opinions are also influenced by the opinions of the people they are connected to in the network. These connections can be either positive (agreeing with someone) or negative (disagreeing with someone).
The research explores how the structure of the social network and the balance of positive and negative connections affect whether people's opinions converge (come together) or become more polarized (move further apart). For example, if there are more negative connections in the network, that could lead to greater polarization, with people's opinions becoming more extreme and divided.
By understanding these opinion dynamics, researchers can gain insights into how social networks and interpersonal interactions shape the formation and evolution of people's beliefs and attitudes over time.
Technical Explanation
The Friedkin-Johnsen model for opinion dynamics on signed graphs (link) extends previous work on opinion formation by incorporating both positive and negative interpersonal influences. In this model, each individual in the social network has an initial opinion, represented as a real number.
Over time, each individual's opinion is updated based on a weighted average of their own initial opinion and the opinions of their neighbors in the network. The weights depend on the strength and sign (positive or negative) of the connections between individuals. Positive connections represent agreement or trust, while negative connections represent disagreement or distrust.
The research explores how network structures and the distribution of positive and negative connections impact the convergence or polarization of opinions in the system. Experiments demonstrate that the presence of negative connections can inhibit opinion consensus and lead to the emergence of distinct opinion clusters (link).
The authors also analyze the properties of the opinion dynamics, such as the conditions for opinion convergence and the relationship between network topology and the final opinion distribution (link). These insights contribute to a broader understanding of how social networks and interpersonal influences shape the formation and evolution of individual and collective beliefs (link).
Critical Analysis
The Friedkin-Johnsen model provides a useful framework for studying opinion dynamics in signed social networks, but it also has some limitations. The model assumes that individuals' opinions are represented as single real-valued numbers, which may oversimplify the complexity of real-world belief systems (link).
Additionally, the model does not account for factors such as individual biases, the influence of external information sources, or the dynamics of opinion formation and change over longer timescales. Further research could explore extensions of the model to address these additional complexities.
Despite these caveats, the Friedkin-Johnsen model offers valuable insights into how network structure and the balance of positive and negative social connections can shape the emergence of opinion consensus or polarization. These findings have important implications for understanding the dynamics of social and political discourse in the digital age.
Conclusion
The Friedkin-Johnsen model for opinion dynamics on signed graphs provides a powerful framework for studying how social networks and interpersonal influences shape the formation and evolution of individual and collective beliefs. By incorporating both positive and negative connections, the model offers insights into the conditions that can lead to opinion convergence or polarization.
While the model has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in the field of opinion dynamics research. The insights gained from this work can inform our understanding of how social media, political discourse, and other social phenomena contribute to the shaping of public opinion and belief systems. As such, this research has the potential to inform interventions and policies aimed at promoting greater social cohesion and productive dialogue in an increasingly polarized world.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Friedkin-Johnsen Model for Opinion Dynamics on Signed Graphs
Xiaotian Zhou, Haoxin Sun, Wanyue Xu, Wei Li, Zhongzhi Zhang
A signed graph offers richer information than an unsigned graph, since it describes both collaborative and competitive relationships in social networks. In this paper, we study opinion dynamics on a signed graph, based on the Friedkin-Johnsen model. We first interpret the equilibrium opinion in terms of a defined random walk on an augmented signed graph, by representing the equilibrium opinion of every node as a combination of all nodes' internal opinions, with the coefficient of the internal opinion for each node being the difference of two absorbing probabilities. We then quantify some relevant social phenomena and express them in terms of the $ell_2$ norms of vectors. We also design a nearly-linear time signed Laplacian solver for assessing these quantities, by establishing a connection between the absorbing probability of random walks on a signed graph and that on an associated unsigned graph. We further study the opinion optimization problem by changing the initial opinions of a fixed number of nodes, which can be optimally solved in cubic time. We provide a nearly-linear time algorithm with error guarantee to approximately solve the problem. Finally, we execute extensive experiments on sixteen real-life signed networks, which show that both of our algorithms are effective and efficient, and are scalable to massive graphs with over 20 million nodes.
Read more7/18/2024
✨
0
Opinion Dynamics Incorporating Higher-Order Interactions
Zuobai Zhang, Wanyue Xu, Zhongzhi Zhang, Guanrong Chen
The issue of opinion sharing and formation has received considerable attention in the academic literature, and a few models have been proposed to study this problem. However, existing models are limited to the interactions among nearest neighbors, ignoring those second, third, and higher-order neighbors, despite the fact that higher-order interactions occur frequently in real social networks. In this paper, we develop a new model for opinion dynamics by incorporating long-range interactions based on higher-order random walks. We prove that the model converges to a fixed opinion vector, which may differ greatly from those models without higher-order interactions. Since direct computation of the equilibrium opinion is computationally expensive, which involves the operations of huge-scale matrix multiplication and inversion, we design a theoretically convergence-guaranteed estimation algorithm that approximates the equilibrium opinion vector nearly linearly in both space and time with respect to the number of edges in the graph. We conduct extensive experiments on various social networks, demonstrating that the new algorithm is both highly efficient and effective.
Read more8/15/2024
🎯
0
Asynchronous Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks
Petra Berenbrink, Martin Hoefer, Dominik Kaaser, Pascal Lenzner, Malin Rau, Daniel Schmand
Opinion spreading in a society decides the fate of elections, the success of products, and the impact of political or social movements. The model by Hegselmann and Krause is a well-known theoretical model to study such opinion formation processes in social networks. In contrast to many other theoretical models, it does not converge towards a situation where all agents agree on the same opinion. Instead, it assumes that people find an opinion reasonable if and only if it is close to their own. The system converges towards a stable situation where agents sharing the same opinion form a cluster, and agents in different clusters do not mbox{influence each other.} We focus on the social variant of the Hegselmann-Krause model where agents are connected by a social network and their opinions evolve in an iterative process. When activated, an agent adopts the average of the opinions of its neighbors having a similar opinion. By this, the set of influencing neighbors of an agent may change over time. To the best of our knowledge, social Hegselmann-Krause systems with asynchronous opinion updates have only been studied with the complete graph as social network. We show that such opinion dynamics with random agent activation are guaranteed to converge for any social network. We provide an upper bound of $mathcal{O}(n|E|^2 (varepsilon/delta)^2)$ on the expected number of opinion updates until convergence, where $|E|$ is the number of edges of the social network. For the complete social network we show a bound of $mathcal{O}(n^3(n^2 + (varepsilon/delta)^2))$ that represents a major improvement over the previously best upper bound of $mathcal{O}(n^9 (varepsilon/delta)^2)$. Our bounds are complemented by simulations that indicate asymptotically matching lower bounds.
Read more4/16/2024
0
Opinion Dynamics for Utility Maximizing Agents: Exploring the Impact of Resource Penalty
Prashil Wankhede, Nirabhra Mandal, Sonia Mart'inez, Pavankumar Tallapragada
We propose a continuous-time nonlinear model of opinion dynamics with utility-maximizing agents connected via a social influence network. A distinguishing feature of the proposed model is the inclusion of an opinion-dependent resource-penalty term in the utilities, which limits the agents from holding opinions of large magnitude. The proposed utility functions also account for how the relative resources within the social group affect both an agent's stubbornness and social influence. Each agent myopically seeks to maximize its utility by revising its opinion in the gradient ascent direction of its utility function, thus leading to the proposed opinion dynamics. We show that, for any arbitrary social influence network, opinions are ultimately bounded. For networks with weak antagonistic relations, we show that there exists a globally exponentially stable equilibrium using contraction theory. We establish conditions for the existence of consensus equilibrium and analyze the relative dominance of the agents at consensus. We also conduct a game-theoretic analysis of the underlying opinion formation game, including on Nash equilibria and on prices of anarchy in terms of satisfaction ratios. Additionally, we also investigate the oscillatory behavior of opinions in a two-agent scenario. Finally, simulations illustrate our findings.
Read more4/9/2024