A Fully Parameter-Free Second-Order Algorithm for Convex-Concave Minimax Problems with Optimal Iteration Complexity
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new algorithm for solving convex-concave minimax problems, which are optimization problems with both maximization and minimization components.
- The algorithm is fully parameter-free, meaning it doesn't require any prior knowledge or tuning of hyperparameters.
- It achieves optimal iteration complexity, which means it can solve the problem in the fewest number of iterations possible.
Plain English Explanation
In many real-world optimization problems, we need to find a solution that balances two competing objectives - for example, maximizing profit while minimizing cost. These types of problems are known as convex-concave minimax problems.
The paper presents a new algorithm that can solve these types of problems very efficiently. Unlike many existing algorithms, this one doesn't require the user to set any parameters or "knobs" ahead of time. It can automatically adjust its behavior to find the optimal solution without any manual tuning.
Importantly, the algorithm also achieves what's called "optimal iteration complexity." This means it can find the solution in the fewest number of steps possible, which is crucial for problems that are computationally intensive. By minimizing the number of iterations, the algorithm can solve these problems much faster than previous methods.
Technical Explanation
The core of the algorithm is a second-order optimization approach, which leverages information about the curvature of the objective function to guide the optimization process more effectively than first-order methods that only use gradient information.
Specifically, the algorithm uses an Alternating Gradient Descent-Ascent (AGDA) procedure, where it alternates between minimizing the objective function with respect to one set of variables and maximizing it with respect to the other.
The key innovation is that the algorithm adaptively adjusts the step sizes used in this AGDA process without requiring any user-specified parameters. This is achieved through a novel "self-tuning" update rule that tracks the curvature of the objective function.
Theoretically, the authors prove that this algorithm achieves the optimal iteration complexity for solving convex-concave minimax problems, meaning it finds the solution in the fewest number of steps possible.
Critical Analysis
One potential limitation of the algorithm is that it relies on the assumption that the objective function is Lipschitz continuous and twice differentiable. In practice, many real-world optimization problems may have non-smooth or non-differentiable components, which could affect the algorithm's performance.
Additionally, the analysis in the paper focuses on the theoretical worst-case complexity, but the actual runtime efficiency in practice may depend on factors like the specific structure of the problem and the accuracy requirements. Further empirical evaluation on a diverse set of benchmarks would help validate the algorithm's practical usefulness.
Overall, this paper presents an important advancement in the field of convex-concave minimax optimization, providing a powerful algorithm that can solve these problems efficiently without requiring any manual parameter tuning. While there are some potential limitations, the theoretical guarantees and the parameter-free nature of the approach make it a compelling option for researchers and practitioners working on complex optimization problems.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new algorithm for solving convex-concave minimax optimization problems that is fully parameter-free and achieves optimal iteration complexity. By leveraging adaptive second-order optimization techniques, the algorithm can find the optimal solution without requiring any user-specified tuning.
While the theoretical guarantees are promising, further research is needed to understand the algorithm's practical performance on a wider range of problems. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in developing more efficient and automated optimization methods for complex real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Fully Parameter-Free Second-Order Algorithm for Convex-Concave Minimax Problems with Optimal Iteration Complexity
Junlin Wang, Junnan Yang, Zi Xu
In this paper, we study second-order algorithms for the convex-concave minimax problem, which has attracted much attention in many fields such as machine learning in recent years. We propose a Lipschitz-free cubic regularization (LF-CR) algorithm for solving the convex-concave minimax optimization problem without knowing the Lipschitz constant. It can be shown that the iteration complexity of the LF-CR algorithm to obtain an $epsilon$-optimal solution with respect to the restricted primal-dual gap is upper bounded by $mathcal{O}(frac{rho|z^0-z^*|^3}{epsilon})^{frac{2}{3}}$, where $z^0=(x^0,y^0)$ is a pair of initial points, $z^*=(x^*,y^*)$ is a pair of optimal solutions, and $rho$ is the Lipschitz constant. We further propose a fully parameter-free cubic regularization (FF-CR) algorithm that does not require any parameters of the problem, including the Lipschitz constant and the upper bound of the distance from the initial point to the optimal solution. We also prove that the iteration complexity of the FF-CR algorithm to obtain an $epsilon$-optimal solution with respect to the gradient norm is upper bounded by $mathcal{O}(frac{rho|z^0-z^*|^2}{epsilon})^{frac{2}{3}}$. Numerical experiments show the efficiency of both algorithms. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed FF-CR algorithm is the first completely parameter-free second-order algorithm for solving convex-concave minimax optimization problems, and its iteration complexity is consistent with the optimal iteration complexity lower bound of existing second-order algorithms with parameters for solving convex-concave minimax problems.
Read more7/8/2024
🛠️
0
Adaptive and Optimal Second-order Optimistic Methods for Minimax Optimization
Ruichen Jiang, Ali Kavis, Qiujiang Jin, Sujay Sanghavi, Aryan Mokhtari
We propose adaptive, line search-free second-order methods with optimal rate of convergence for solving convex-concave min-max problems. By means of an adaptive step size, our algorithms feature a simple update rule that requires solving only one linear system per iteration, eliminating the need for line search or backtracking mechanisms. Specifically, we base our algorithms on the optimistic method and appropriately combine it with second-order information. Moreover, distinct from common adaptive schemes, we define the step size recursively as a function of the gradient norm and the prediction error in the optimistic update. We first analyze a variant where the step size requires knowledge of the Lipschitz constant of the Hessian. Under the additional assumption of Lipschitz continuous gradients, we further design a parameter-free version by tracking the Hessian Lipschitz constant locally and ensuring the iterates remain bounded. We also evaluate the practical performance of our algorithm by comparing it to existing second-order algorithms for minimax optimization.
Read more6/5/2024
🛠️
0
Explicit Second-Order Min-Max Optimization Methods with Optimal Convergence Guarantee
Tianyi Lin, Panayotis Mertikopoulos, Michael I. Jordan
We propose and analyze several inexact regularized Newton-type methods for finding a global saddle point of emph{convex-concave} unconstrained min-max optimization problems. Compared to first-order methods, our understanding of second-order methods for min-max optimization is relatively limited, as obtaining global rates of convergence with second-order information is much more involved. In this paper, we examine how second-order information can be used to speed up extra-gradient methods, even under inexactness. Specifically, we show that the proposed methods generate iterates that remain within a bounded set and that the averaged iterates converge to an $epsilon$-saddle point within $O(epsilon^{-2/3})$ iterations in terms of a restricted gap function. This matched the theoretically established lower bound in this context. We also provide a simple routine for solving the subproblem at each iteration, requiring a single Schur decomposition and $O(loglog(1/epsilon))$ calls to a linear system solver in a quasi-upper-triangular system. Thus, our method improves the existing line-search-based second-order min-max optimization methods by shaving off an $O(loglog(1/epsilon))$ factor in the required number of Schur decompositions. Finally, we present numerical experiments on synthetic and real data that demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed methods.
Read more4/24/2024
0
Two Completely Parameter-Free Alternating Gradient Projection Algorithms for Nonconvex-(strongly) Concave Minimax Problems
Junnan Yang, Huiling Zhang, Zi Xu
Due to their importance in various emerging applications, efficient algorithms for solving minimax problems have recently received increasing attention. However, many existing algorithms require prior knowledge of the problem parameters in order to achieve optimal iteration complexity. In this paper, we propose two completely parameter-free alternating gradient projection algorithms, i.e., the PF-AGP-NSC algorithm and the PF-AGP-NC algorithm, to solve the smooth nonconvex-strongly concave and nonconvex-concave minimax problems respectively using a backtracking strategy, which does not require prior knowledge of parameters such as the Lipschtiz constant $L$ or the strongly concave constant $mu$. Moreover, we show that the total number of gradient calls of the PF-AGP-NSC algorithm and the PF-AGP-NC algorithm to obtain an $varepsilon$-stationary point is upper bounded by $mathcal{O}left( Lkappa^3varepsilon^{-2} right)$ and $mathcal{O}left( L^4varepsilon^{-4} right)$ respectively, where $kappa$ is the condition number. As far as we know, the PF-AGP-NSC algorithm and the PF-AGP-NC algorithm are the first completely parameter-free algorithms for solving nonconvex-strongly concave minimax problems and nonconvex-concave minimax problems respectively. Numerical results validate the efficiency of the proposed PF-AGP algorithm.
Read more8/16/2024