Generalization Bound and Learning Methods for Data-Driven Projections in Linear Programming

Read original: arXiv:2309.00203 - Published 5/22/2024 by Shinsaku Sakaue, Taihei Oki
Total Score

0

🔎

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Solving high-dimensional linear programs (LPs) efficiently is a fundamental challenge
  • Recent research has explored using random projections to reduce LP sizes and accelerate solving, independent of improving LP solvers
  • This paper explores a new approach of using data-driven projections, where projection matrices are learned from training data rather than being random

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores a new way to solve large, high-dimensional linear programs (LPs) more efficiently. Linear programs are mathematical optimization problems that are commonly used in fields like finance, logistics, and resource allocation. Traditionally, solving these LPs has been computationally expensive, especially when the problems have many variables (i.e., high dimensions).

Recent research has shown that using random projections can help reduce the size of LPs and speed up the solving process, without needing to improve the LP solvers themselves. In this paper, the authors take a different approach and propose using "data-driven projections" instead of random ones.

The key idea is to learn a projection matrix from a set of training LPs, rather than using a random matrix. When given a new LP to solve, the authors first use the learned projection matrix to reduce the dimensionality of the problem from the original high dimension down to a lower dimension. They then solve the lower-dimensional LP and use the learned projection matrix to recover the solution to the original high-dimensional LP.

The authors address the theoretical question of how much training data is needed to ensure the quality of the recovered solutions. They provide bounds on the "pseudo-dimension" of the performance metric, which is a measure of the complexity of the problem and how much data is required for good generalization.

On the practical side, the authors explore two simple methods for learning the projection matrices: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and gradient-based optimization. While PCA is relatively efficient, the gradient-based method can sometimes achieve better solution quality.

The key takeaway is that learning projection matrices from data can significantly improve the quality of solutions to high-dimensional LPs, compared to using random projections, while also greatly reducing the time required to solve them.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a new approach to solving high-dimensional linear programs (LPs) efficiently by using data-driven projections. The core idea is to learn a projection matrix from a set of training LPs, rather than using a random projection matrix as in previous work.

The authors first formulate the problem of learning the projection matrix from training data. Given a set of $n$-dimensional LPs, the goal is to learn an $n \times k$ projection matrix (where $n > k$) that can be used to reduce the dimensionality of future LP instances from $n$ to $k$, solve the lower-dimensional LP, and then recover the $n$-dimensional solution.

On the theoretical side, the authors analyze the sample complexity of this approach. They show that the pseudo-dimension (a measure of problem complexity) of the performance metric is $\tilde{O}(nk^2)$, where $\tilde{O}$ suppresses logarithmic factors. This implies that $\tilde{O}(nk^2)$ training examples are sufficient to ensure good generalization of the learned projection matrix. The authors also provide a matching $\Omega(nk)$ lower bound, showing that their upper bound is tight up to an $\tilde{O}(k)$ factor.

For the practical implementation, the authors explore two methods for learning the projection matrix: PCA and gradient-based optimization. While PCA is relatively efficient, the gradient-based method can sometimes achieve better solution quality.

The key experimental finding is that learning projection matrices from data significantly outperforms using random projections in terms of solution quality, while also greatly reducing the time required to solve the LPs. This demonstrates the benefits of the data-driven projection approach compared to the existing random projection methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to solving high-dimensional linear programs more efficiently. The theoretical analysis provides useful bounds on the sample complexity, which can help guide the practical application of this method.

One potential limitation is that the theoretical results only provide bounds on the pseudo-dimension, which may not directly translate to tight bounds on the generalization error. [Further theoretical work could explore tighter generalization bounds, perhaps using tools from learning theory or other frameworks.](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/data-driven-performance-guarantees-classical-learned-optimizers)

Additionally, the paper only explores two relatively simple methods for learning the projection matrices (PCA and gradient-based optimization). It would be interesting to see if more sophisticated machine learning techniques, such as deep neural networks, could further improve the quality of the learned projections.

Finally, the paper focuses on the setting of linear programs, but the general idea of using data-driven projections could potentially be extended to other types of high-dimensional optimization problems. Exploring the broader applicability of this approach could be a fruitful direction for future research.

Conclusion

This paper presents a new approach to solving high-dimensional linear programs more efficiently, by learning projection matrices from training data rather than using random projections. The key theoretical and practical contributions are:

  • Providing upper and lower bounds on the pseudo-dimension of the performance metric, which characterizes the sample complexity of the learning problem.
  • Exploring two simple methods for learning the projection matrices, with the gradient-based approach outperforming the PCA-based method in some cases.
  • Demonstrating through experiments that the data-driven projection approach can significantly improve solution quality and reduce solving time compared to using random projections.

Overall, this work represents an important step forward in developing more efficient algorithms for solving high-dimensional optimization problems, with potential applications in a wide range of domains.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔎

Total Score

0

Generalization Bound and Learning Methods for Data-Driven Projections in Linear Programming

Shinsaku Sakaue, Taihei Oki

How to solve high-dimensional linear programs (LPs) efficiently is a fundamental question. Recently, there has been a surge of interest in reducing LP sizes using random projections, which can accelerate solving LPs independently of improving LP solvers. This paper explores a new direction of data-driven projections, which use projection matrices learned from data instead of random projection matrices. Given training data of $n$-dimensional LPs, we learn an $ntimes k$ projection matrix with $n > k$. When addressing a future LP instance, we reduce its dimensionality from $n$ to $k$ via the learned projection matrix, solve the resulting LP to obtain a $k$-dimensional solution, and apply the learned matrix to it to recover an $n$-dimensional solution. On the theoretical side, a natural question is: how much data is sufficient to ensure the quality of recovered solutions? We address this question based on the framework of data-driven algorithm design, which connects the amount of data sufficient for establishing generalization bounds to the pseudo-dimension of performance metrics. We obtain an $tilde{mathrm{O}}(nk^2)$ upper bound on the pseudo-dimension, where $tilde{mathrm{O}}$ compresses logarithmic factors. We also provide an $Omega(nk)$ lower bound, implying our result is tight up to an $tilde{mathrm{O}}(k)$ factor. On the practical side, we explore two simple methods for learning projection matrices: PCA- and gradient-based methods. While the former is relatively efficient, the latter can sometimes achieve better solution quality. Experiments demonstrate that learning projection matrices from data is indeed beneficial: it leads to significantly higher solution quality than the existing random projection while greatly reducing the time for solving LPs.

Read more

5/22/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

Approximation and generalization properties of the random projection classification method

Mireille Boutin, Evzenie Coupkova

The generalization gap of a classifier is related to the complexity of the set of functions among which the classifier is chosen. We study a family of low-complexity classifiers consisting of thresholding a random one-dimensional feature. The feature is obtained by projecting the data on a random line after embedding it into a higher-dimensional space parametrized by monomials of order up to k. More specifically, the extended data is projected n-times and the best classifier among those n, based on its performance on training data, is chosen. We show that this type of classifier is extremely flexible as, given full knowledge of the class conditional densities, under mild conditions, the error of these classifiers would converge to the optimal (Bayes) error as k and n go to infinity. We also bound the generalization gap of the random classifiers. In general, these bounds are better than those for any classifier with VC dimension greater than O(ln n). In particular, the bounds imply that, unless the number of projections n is extremely large, the generalization gap of the random projection approach is significantly smaller than that of a linear classifier in the extended space. Thus, for certain classification problems (e.g., those with a large Rashomon ratio), there is a potntially large gain in generalization properties by selecting parameters at random, rather than selecting the best one amongst the class.

Read more

9/12/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Random Linear Projections Loss for Hyperplane-Based Optimization in Neural Networks

Shyam Venkatasubramanian, Ahmed Aloui, Vahid Tarokh

Advancing loss function design is pivotal for optimizing neural network training and performance. This work introduces Random Linear Projections (RLP) loss, a novel approach that enhances training efficiency by leveraging geometric relationships within the data. Distinct from traditional loss functions that target minimizing pointwise errors, RLP loss operates by minimizing the distance between sets of hyperplanes connecting fixed-size subsets of feature-prediction pairs and feature-label pairs. Our empirical evaluations, conducted across benchmark datasets and synthetic examples, demonstrate that neural networks trained with RLP loss outperform those trained with traditional loss functions, achieving improved performance with fewer data samples, and exhibiting greater robustness to additive noise. We provide theoretical analysis supporting our empirical findings.

Read more

6/3/2024

🚀

Total Score

0

Data-Driven Performance Guarantees for Classical and Learned Optimizers

Rajiv Sambharya, Bartolomeo Stellato

We introduce a data-driven approach to analyze the performance of continuous optimization algorithms using generalization guarantees from statistical learning theory. We study classical and learned optimizers to solve families of parametric optimization problems. We build generalization guarantees for classical optimizers, using a sample convergence bound, and for learned optimizers, using the Probably Approximately Correct (PAC)-Bayes framework. To train learned optimizers, we use a gradient-based algorithm to directly minimize the PAC-Bayes upper bound. Numerical experiments in signal processing, control, and meta-learning showcase the ability of our framework to provide strong generalization guarantees for both classical and learned optimizers given a fixed budget of iterations. For classical optimizers, our bounds are much tighter than those that worst-case guarantees provide. For learned optimizers, our bounds outperform the empirical outcomes observed in their non-learned counterparts.

Read more

5/24/2024