Generalized Encouragement-Based Instrumental Variables for Counterfactual Regression
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a novel approach called Generalized Encouragement-Based Instrumental Variables (GEIVs) for estimating counterfactual regression models.
- The method addresses limitations of existing instrumental variable (IV) techniques by relaxing assumptions and allowing for more flexible modeling.
- The paper provides theoretical guarantees and demonstrates the effectiveness of GEIVs through simulations and real-world applications.
Plain English Explanation
When trying to understand the causal effects of something, researchers often use instrumental variables - a variable that influences the "treatment" but not the outcome directly. However, traditional IV methods make strong assumptions that are often violated in practice.
The GEIVs approach introduced in this paper provides a more flexible way to leverage instrumental variables. It relaxes the assumptions of standard IV models and allows for more complex relationships between the instruments, treatments, and outcomes.
This enables researchers to better estimate the counterfactual - what would have happened if the treatment had been different. The authors demonstrate through simulations and real-world examples that GEIVs can outperform traditional IV methods, especially when the assumptions of those methods are violated.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation of GEIVs is the use of encouragement designs - interventions that increase the likelihood of a treatment but do not directly affect the outcome. This allows the method to handle cases where the standard IV assumptions of monotonicity and exclusion restriction are violated.
The paper provides a formal framework for GEIVs, including identification conditions and estimation procedures. It also establishes theoretical guarantees for the consistency and asymptotic normality of the GEIV estimator.
Through extensive simulations and real-world applications, the authors demonstrate the advantages of GEIVs over standard IV methods, especially when the exclusion restriction is violated.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical foundation for GEIVs and convincingly demonstrates their empirical advantages. However, the method still relies on some assumptions, such as the existence of valid encouragement designs. In practice, finding suitable encouragement variables may be challenging, and the authors acknowledge this as a limitation.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the sensitivity of GEIVs to misspecification of the encouragement model. Further research could investigate the robustness of the method to modeling errors or violations of the encouragement assumptions.
Conclusion
The Generalized Encouragement-Based Instrumental Variables (GEIVs) approach introduced in this paper provides a promising new tool for causal inference and counterfactual analysis. By relaxing the assumptions of traditional IV methods, GEIVs enable more flexible and accurate estimation of treatment effects, especially in complex real-world scenarios. While the method has some limitations, the theoretical and empirical results presented in the paper suggest it could be a valuable addition to the causal inference toolkit.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Generalized Encouragement-Based Instrumental Variables for Counterfactual Regression
Anpeng Wu, Kun Kuang, Ruoxuan Xiong, Xiangwei Chen, Zexu Sun, Fei Wu, Kun Zhang
In causal inference, encouragement designs (EDs) are widely used to analyze causal effects, when randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are impractical or compliance to treatment cannot be perfectly enforced. Unlike RCTs, which directly allocate treatments, EDs randomly assign encouragement policies that positively motivate individuals to engage in a specific treatment. These random encouragements act as instrumental variables (IVs), facilitating the identification of causal effects through leveraging exogenous perturbations in discrete treatment scenarios. However, real-world applications of encouragement designs often face challenges such as incomplete randomization, limited experimental data, and significantly fewer encouragements compared to treatments, hindering precise causal effect estimation. To address this, this paper introduces novel theories and algorithms for identifying the Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) using variations in encouragement. Further, by leveraging both observational and encouragement data, we propose a generalized IV estimator, named Encouragement-based Counterfactual Regression (EnCounteR), to effectively estimate the causal effects. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of EnCounteR over existing methods.
Read more8/13/2024
0
Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects by Combining Weak Instruments and Observational Data
Miruna Oprescu, Nathan Kallus
Accurately predicting conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) is crucial in personalized medicine and digital platform analytics. Since often the treatments of interest cannot be directly randomized, observational data is leveraged to learn CATEs, but this approach can incur significant bias from unobserved confounding. One strategy to overcome these limitations is to seek latent quasi-experiments in instrumental variables (IVs) for the treatment, for example, a randomized intent to treat or a randomized product recommendation. This approach, on the other hand, can suffer from low compliance, i.e., IV weakness. Some subgroups may even exhibit zero compliance meaning we cannot instrument for their CATEs at all. In this paper we develop a novel approach to combine IV and observational data to enable reliable CATE estimation in the presence of unobserved confounding in the observational data and low compliance in the IV data, including no compliance for some subgroups. We propose a two-stage framework that first learns biased CATEs from the observational data, and then applies a compliance-weighted correction using IV data, effectively leveraging IV strength variability across covariates. We characterize the convergence rates of our method and validate its effectiveness through a simulation study. Additionally, we demonstrate its utility with real data by analyzing the heterogeneous effects of 401(k) plan participation on wealth.
Read more6/11/2024
0
Data-driven Conditional Instrumental Variables for Debiasing Recommender Systems
Zhirong Huang, Shichao Zhang, Debo Cheng, Jiuyong Li, Lin Liu, Guangquan Lu
In recommender systems, latent variables can cause user-item interaction data to deviate from true user preferences. This biased data is then used to train recommendation models, further amplifying the bias and ultimately compromising both recommendation accuracy and user satisfaction. Instrumental Variable (IV) methods are effective tools for addressing the confounding bias introduced by latent variables; however, identifying a valid IV is often challenging. To overcome this issue, we propose a novel data-driven conditional IV (CIV) debiasing method for recommender systems, called CIV4Rec. CIV4Rec automatically generates valid CIVs and their corresponding conditioning sets directly from interaction data, significantly reducing the complexity of IV selection while effectively mitigating the confounding bias caused by latent variables in recommender systems. Specifically, CIV4Rec leverages a variational autoencoder (VAE) to generate the representations of the CIV and its conditional set from interaction data, followed by the application of least squares to derive causal representations for click prediction. Extensive experiments on two real-world datasets, Movielens-10M and Douban-Movie, demonstrate that our CIV4Rec successfully identifies valid CIVs, effectively reduces bias, and consequently improves recommendation accuracy.
Read more8/20/2024
0
Meta-Learners for Partially-Identified Treatment Effects Across Multiple Environments
Jonas Schweisthal, Dennis Frauen, Mihaela van der Schaar, Stefan Feuerriegel
Estimating the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) from observational data is relevant for many applications such as personalized medicine. Here, we focus on the widespread setting where the observational data come from multiple environments, such as different hospitals, physicians, or countries. Furthermore, we allow for violations of standard causal assumptions, namely, overlap within the environments and unconfoundedness. To this end, we move away from point identification and focus on partial identification. Specifically, we show that current assumptions from the literature on multiple environments allow us to interpret the environment as an instrumental variable (IV). This allows us to adapt bounds from the IV literature for partial identification of CATE by leveraging treatment assignment mechanisms across environments. Then, we propose different model-agnostic learners (so-called meta-learners) to estimate the bounds that can be used in combination with arbitrary machine learning models. We further demonstrate the effectiveness of our meta-learners across various experiments using both simulated and real-world data. Finally, we discuss the applicability of our meta-learners to partial identification in instrumental variable settings, such as randomized controlled trials with non-compliance.
Read more6/5/2024