Rigorous Probabilistic Guarantees for Robust Counterfactual Explanations
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach to generating robust and plausible counterfactual explanations for neural network models.
- The authors develop a rigorous probabilistic framework that provides formal guarantees on the robustness and plausibility of the generated counterfactuals.
- Their method is designed to produce counterfactuals that are not only faithful to the model's decision-making process, but also resistant to perturbations and adversarial attacks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a way to generate counterfactual explanations for machine learning models that are both reliable and easy to understand. Counterfactual explanations show how an input would need to be changed to get a different model prediction, which can help users understand the model's decision-making.
The key idea is to develop a mathematical framework that can provide strong guarantees about the quality of these counterfactual explanations. Specifically, the authors want the counterfactuals to be:
- Robust: The counterfactuals should still work even if the input is slightly perturbed or attacked by an adversary. This ensures the explanations are meaningful and reliable.
- Plausible: The counterfactuals should represent changes that are realistic and believable, not just arbitrary modifications. This makes the explanations more intuitive and actionable for users.
To achieve this, the authors propose a new algorithm that generates counterfactuals with rigorous mathematical proofs about their robustness and plausibility. This goes beyond previous work that relied more on heuristics or did not provide such strong guarantees.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by formalizing the problem of generating robust and plausible counterfactual explanations. The authors model this as an optimization problem, where the goal is to find the closest counterfactual input to the original that changes the model's prediction.
To ensure robustness, they introduce a probabilistic framework that provides formal guarantees about the counterfactual's sensitivity to input perturbations. This involves defining a probability distribution over the input space and bounding the likelihood that the counterfactual would still be valid under small changes to the input.
For plausibility, the authors incorporate domain-specific constraints into the optimization problem, such as ensuring the counterfactual remains within the manifold of realistic inputs. They also leverage auxiliary models trained to assess the plausibility of candidate counterfactuals.
The key technical contribution is an algorithm that solves this joint optimization problem, producing counterfactuals that are both robust and plausible. The authors prove theoretical bounds on the quality of the generated counterfactuals and demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through experiments on various datasets and model architectures, including graph neural networks.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a rigorous and principled approach to a important problem in explainable AI. The probabilistic framework and formal guarantees are significant advances over prior work, which often relied more on heuristics or did not provide such strong theoretical assurances.
However, the authors acknowledge that their method relies on several strong assumptions, such as the availability of an accurate input distribution model and the ability to encode plausibility constraints effectively. In practice, these requirements may be difficult to satisfy, especially for complex, high-dimensional input spaces.
Additionally, the optimization problem underlying their algorithm can be computationally intensive, potentially limiting its scalability to larger models and datasets. The authors discuss strategies to improve efficiency, but further research may be needed to make the approach more practical for real-world deployments.
Another limitation is that the paper focuses primarily on the technical aspects of counterfactual generation, without delving deeply into the broader ethical and societal implications of such explanations. As AI systems become more widely deployed, it will be crucial to consider how these techniques could be misused or have unintended consequences.
Conclusion
This paper presents a significant advance in the field of explainable AI by introducing a novel framework for generating robust and plausible counterfactual explanations. The rigorous probabilistic guarantees and formal optimization approach represent an important step towards making AI systems more transparent and accountable.
While the method has some practical limitations that require further research, the core ideas and theoretical contributions of the paper lay the groundwork for future work in this area. As AI continues to play an increasingly central role in high-stakes decision-making, tools like those developed in this paper will become increasingly crucial for ensuring the fairness, reliability, and interpretability of these systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Rigorous Probabilistic Guarantees for Robust Counterfactual Explanations
Luca Marzari, Francesco Leofante, Ferdinando Cicalese, Alessandro Farinelli
We study the problem of assessing the robustness of counterfactual explanations for deep learning models. We focus on $textit{plausible model shifts}$ altering model parameters and propose a novel framework to reason about the robustness property in this setting. To motivate our solution, we begin by showing for the first time that computing the robustness of counterfactuals with respect to plausible model shifts is NP-complete. As this (practically) rules out the existence of scalable algorithms for exactly computing robustness, we propose a novel probabilistic approach which is able to provide tight estimates of robustness with strong guarantees while preserving scalability. Remarkably, and differently from existing solutions targeting plausible model shifts, our approach does not impose requirements on the network to be analyzed, thus enabling robustness analysis on a wider range of architectures. Experiments on four binary classification datasets indicate that our method improves the state of the art in generating robust explanations, outperforming existing methods on a range of metrics.
Read more7/11/2024
🧠
0
Provably Robust and Plausible Counterfactual Explanations for Neural Networks via Robust Optimisation
Junqi Jiang, Jianglin Lan, Francesco Leofante, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni
Counterfactual Explanations (CEs) have received increasing interest as a major methodology for explaining neural network classifiers. Usually, CEs for an input-output pair are defined as data points with minimum distance to the input that are classified with a different label than the output. To tackle the established problem that CEs are easily invalidated when model parameters are updated (e.g. retrained), studies have proposed ways to certify the robustness of CEs under model parameter changes bounded by a norm ball. However, existing methods targeting this form of robustness are not sound or complete, and they may generate implausible CEs, i.e., outliers wrt the training dataset. In fact, no existing method simultaneously optimises for closeness and plausibility while preserving robustness guarantees. In this work, we propose Provably RObust and PLAusible Counterfactual Explanations (PROPLACE), a method leveraging on robust optimisation techniques to address the aforementioned limitations in the literature. We formulate an iterative algorithm to compute provably robust CEs and prove its convergence, soundness and completeness. Through a comparative experiment involving six baselines, five of which target robustness, we show that PROPLACE achieves state-of-the-art performances against metrics on three evaluation aspects.
Read more4/5/2024
0
Generally-Occurring Model Change for Robust Counterfactual Explanations
Ao Xu, Tieru Wu
With the increasing impact of algorithmic decision-making on human lives, the interpretability of models has become a critical issue in machine learning. Counterfactual explanation is an important method in the field of interpretable machine learning, which can not only help users understand why machine learning models make specific decisions, but also help users understand how to change these decisions. Naturally, it is an important task to study the robustness of counterfactual explanation generation algorithms to model changes. Previous literature has proposed the concept of Naturally-Occurring Model Change, which has given us a deeper understanding of robustness to model change. In this paper, we first further generalize the concept of Naturally-Occurring Model Change, proposing a more general concept of model parameter changes, Generally-Occurring Model Change, which has a wider range of applicability. We also prove the corresponding probabilistic guarantees. In addition, we consider a more specific problem, data set perturbation, and give relevant theoretical results by combining optimization theory.
Read more7/17/2024
0
Counterfactual Explanations with Probabilistic Guarantees on their Robustness to Model Change
Ignacy Stk{e}pka, Mateusz Lango, Jerzy Stefanowski
Counterfactual explanations (CFEs) guide users on how to adjust inputs to machine learning models to achieve desired outputs. While existing research primarily addresses static scenarios, real-world applications often involve data or model changes, potentially invalidating previously generated CFEs and rendering user-induced input changes ineffective. Current methods addressing this issue often support only specific models or change types, require extensive hyperparameter tuning, or fail to provide probabilistic guarantees on CFE robustness to model changes. This paper proposes a novel approach for generating CFEs that provides probabilistic guarantees for any model and change type, while offering interpretable and easy-to-select hyperparameters. We establish a theoretical framework for probabilistically defining robustness to model change and demonstrate how our BetaRCE method directly stems from it. BetaRCE is a post-hoc method applied alongside a chosen base CFE generation method to enhance the quality of the explanation beyond robustness. It facilitates a transition from the base explanation to a more robust one with user-adjusted probability bounds. Through experimental comparisons with baselines, we show that BetaRCE yields robust, most plausible, and closest to baseline counterfactual explanations.
Read more8/12/2024