Generating Diverse Criteria On-the-Fly to Improve Point-wise LLM Rankers
2404.11960
0
0
š
Abstract
The most recent pointwise Large Language Model (LLM) rankers have achieved remarkable ranking results. However, these rankers are hindered by two major drawbacks: (1) they fail to follow a standardized comparison guidance during the ranking process, and (2) they struggle with comprehensive considerations when dealing with complicated passages. To address these shortcomings, we propose to build a ranker that generates ranking scores based on a set of criteria from various perspectives. These criteria are intended to direct each perspective in providing a distinct yet synergistic evaluation. Our research, which examines eight datasets from the BEIR benchmark demonstrates that incorporating this multi-perspective criteria ensemble approach markedly enhanced the performance of pointwise LLM rankers.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Recent pointwise Large Language Model (LLM) rankers have achieved remarkable ranking results, but they face two major drawbacks:
- They fail to follow a standardized comparison guidance during the ranking process.
- They struggle with comprehensive considerations when dealing with complicated passages.
Plain English Explanation
To address these issues, the researchers propose building a ranker that generates ranking scores based on a set of criteria from various perspectives. These criteria are intended to provide a distinct yet synergistic evaluation, with each perspective contributing to the overall assessment.
The researchers examine eight datasets from the BEIR benchmark and find that incorporating this multi-perspective criteria ensemble approach markedly enhances the performance of pointwise LLM rankers.
This approach aims to overcome the limitations of current LLM rankers, which can struggle to provide a well-rounded evaluation when faced with complex passages. By considering multiple perspectives, the proposed ranker aims to deliver more comprehensive and reliable ranking results.
Technical Explanation
The researchers present a novel approach to building a ranker that generates scores based on a set of criteria from various perspectives. This multi-perspective criteria ensemble approach is designed to address the shortcomings of existing pointwise LLM rankers, which often fail to follow a standardized comparison guidance and struggle with comprehensive considerations when dealing with intricate passages.
The researchers examine the performance of this approach across eight datasets from the BEIR benchmark, a widely used resource for evaluating the ranking capabilities of LLMs. Their findings demonstrate that the incorporation of the multi-perspective criteria ensemble significantly improves the performance of pointwise LLM rankers, suggesting that this approach can effectively address the limitations of current rankers.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that their proposed approach is not without its limitations. They note that the selection and weighting of the various criteria used in the ensemble can have a significant impact on the overall performance of the ranker. Additionally, the researchers mention that further research is needed to explore the generalizability of their approach to a wider range of datasets and scenarios.
It is also worth considering the potential challenges in implementing a multi-perspective criteria ensemble in practice. Ensuring that the individual criteria are well-defined, non-overlapping, and equally weighted can be a complex task, which may limit the scalability and adaptability of the proposed solution.
Furthermore, the researchers do not delve into the potential biases or fairness implications of their approach. As recent research has highlighted, LLM-based rankers can exhibit biases and inconsistencies in their evaluations. It would be valuable for the researchers to explore the fairness and unbiasedness of their multi-perspective criteria ensemble ranker.
Conclusion
The researchers have proposed a novel approach to building a more comprehensive and effective pointwise LLM ranker. By incorporating a multi-perspective criteria ensemble, the researchers aim to address the limitations of current rankers, which often fail to provide a well-rounded evaluation when dealing with complex passages.
The promising results demonstrated across the BEIR benchmark datasets suggest that this approach has the potential to significantly improve the performance and reliability of LLM-based ranking systems. However, further research is needed to explore the scalability, fairness, and generalizability of this method, as well as to address the potential challenges in implementing a multi-perspective criteria ensemble in practice.
Overall, this research represents an important step forward in the development of more advanced and comprehensive LLM ranking systems, with potential implications for a wide range of applications that rely on accurate and unbiased information retrieval.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Make Large Language Model a Better Ranker
Wenshuo Chao, Zhi Zheng, Hengshu Zhu, Hao Liu
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate robust capabilities across various fields, leading to a paradigm shift in LLM-enhanced Recommender System (RS). Research to date focuses on point-wise and pair-wise recommendation paradigms, which are inefficient for LLM-based recommenders due to high computational costs. However, existing list-wise approaches also fall short in ranking tasks due to misalignment between ranking objectives and next-token prediction. Moreover, these LLM-based methods struggle to effectively address the order relation among candidates, particularly given the scale of ratings. To address these challenges, this paper introduces the large language model framework with Aligned Listwise Ranking Objectives (ALRO). ALRO is designed to bridge the gap between the capabilities of LLMs and the nuanced requirements of ranking tasks. Specifically, ALRO employs explicit feedback in a listwise manner by introducing soft lambda loss, a customized adaptation of lambda loss designed for optimizing order relations. This mechanism provides more accurate optimization goals, enhancing the ranking process. Additionally, ALRO incorporates a permutation-sensitive learning mechanism that addresses position bias, a prevalent issue in generative models, without imposing additional computational burdens during inference. Our evaluative studies reveal that ALRO outperforms both existing embedding-based recommendation methods and LLM-based recommendation baselines.
6/26/2024
LLM-enhanced Reranking in Recommender Systems
Jingtong Gao, Bo Chen, Xiangyu Zhao, Weiwen Liu, Xiangyang Li, Yichao Wang, Zijian Zhang, Wanyu Wang, Yuyang Ye, Shanru Lin, Huifeng Guo, Ruiming Tang
0
0
Reranking is a critical component in recommender systems, playing an essential role in refining the output of recommendation algorithms. Traditional reranking models have focused predominantly on accuracy, but modern applications demand consideration of additional criteria such as diversity and fairness. Existing reranking approaches often fail to harmonize these diverse criteria effectively at the model level. Moreover, these models frequently encounter challenges with scalability and personalization due to their complexity and the varying significance of different reranking criteria in diverse scenarios. In response, we introduce a comprehensive reranking framework enhanced by LLM, designed to seamlessly integrate various reranking criteria while maintaining scalability and facilitating personalized recommendations. This framework employs a fully connected graph structure, allowing the LLM to simultaneously consider multiple aspects such as accuracy, diversity, and fairness through a coherent Chain-of-Thought (CoT) process. A customizable input mechanism is also integrated, enabling the tuning of the language model's focus to meet specific reranking needs. We validate our approach using three popular public datasets, where our framework demonstrates superior performance over existing state-of-the-art reranking models in balancing multiple criteria. The code for this implementation is publicly available.
6/21/2024
š¬
Prediction-Powered Ranking of Large Language Models
Ivi Chatzi, Eleni Straitouri, Suhas Thejaswi, Manuel Gomez Rodriguez
0
0
Large language models are often ranked according to their level of alignment with human preferences -- a model is better than other models if its outputs are more frequently preferred by humans. One of the popular ways to elicit human preferences utilizes pairwise comparisons between the outputs provided by different models to the same inputs. However, since gathering pairwise comparisons by humans is costly and time-consuming, it has become a common practice to gather pairwise comparisons by a strong large language model -- a model strongly aligned with human preferences. Surprisingly, practitioners cannot currently measure the uncertainty that any mismatch between human and model preferences may introduce in the constructed rankings. In this work, we develop a statistical framework to bridge this gap. Given a (small) set of pairwise comparisons by humans and a large set of pairwise comparisons by a model, our framework provides a rank-set -- a set of possible ranking positions -- for each of the models under comparison. Moreover, it guarantees that, with a probability greater than or equal to a user-specified value, the rank-sets cover the true ranking consistent with the distribution of human pairwise preferences asymptotically. Using pairwise comparisons made by humans in the LMSYS Chatbot Arena platform and pairwise comparisons made by three strong large language models, we empirically demonstrate the effectivity of our framework and show that the rank-sets constructed using only pairwise comparisons by the strong large language models are often inconsistent with (the distribution of) human pairwise preferences.
5/24/2024
Quantifying Multilingual Performance of Large Language Models Across Languages
Zihao Li, Yucheng Shi, Zirui Liu, Fan Yang, Ali Payani, Ninghao Liu, Mengnan Du
0
0
The development of Large Language Models (LLMs) relies on extensive text corpora, which are often unevenly distributed across languages. This imbalance results in LLMs performing significantly better on high-resource languages like English, German, and French, while their capabilities in low-resource languages remain inadequate. Currently, there is a lack of quantitative methods to evaluate the performance of LLMs in these low-resource languages. To address this gap, we propose the Language Ranker, an intrinsic metric designed to benchmark and rank languages based on LLM performance using internal representations. By comparing the LLM's internal representation of various languages against a baseline derived from English, we can assess the model's multilingual capabilities in a robust and language-agnostic manner. Our analysis reveals that high-resource languages exhibit higher similarity scores with English, demonstrating superior performance, while low-resource languages show lower similarity scores, underscoring the effectiveness of our metric in assessing language-specific capabilities. Besides, the experiments show that there is a strong correlation between the LLM's performance in different languages and the proportion of those languages in its pre-training corpus. These insights underscore the efficacy of the Language Ranker as a tool for evaluating LLM performance across different languages, particularly those with limited resources.
6/18/2024