Generating Likely Counterfactuals Using Sum-Product Networks

Read original: arXiv:2401.14086 - Published 5/28/2024 by Jiri Nemecek, Tomas Pevny, Jakub Marecek
Total Score

0

Generating Likely Counterfactuals Using Sum-Product Networks

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a method for generating "likely counterfactuals" using Sum-Product Networks (SPNs), which are a type of probabilistic graphical model.
  • Counterfactuals are hypothetical scenarios that describe what would have happened if the world had been different in some way. The goal is to generate counterfactuals that are both plausible and informative.
  • The method uses SPNs to model the data distribution and then samples from this distribution to generate counterfactuals that are similar to the observed data.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on both synthetic and real-world datasets.

Plain English Explanation

The paper is about a new way to generate "counterfactuals" - hypothetical scenarios that describe what would have happened if things were different. For example, if someone didn't get accepted to their dream college, a counterfactual might be "What if I had gotten a higher SAT score?" The authors use a type of machine learning model called a Sum-Product Network (SPN) to generate these counterfactuals in a realistic and informative way.

SPNs are good at modeling complex data distributions, so the authors train an SPN on the observed data. Then, they can sample from this SPN to generate new, plausible data that is similar to the original data, but with some differences. These sampled data points represent the counterfactuals.

The key idea is that the counterfactuals generated this way will be both realistic (since they are sampled from the observed data distribution) and informative (since they represent meaningful changes from the original data). This could be useful in all kinds of applications, like generating counterfactual explanations for AI models, exploring the space of possible counterfactuals, or efficiently generating multiple counterfactuals.

Technical Explanation

The key technical innovation in this paper is the use of Sum-Product Networks (SPNs) to model the data distribution and generate counterfactuals. SPNs are a type of probabilistic graphical model that can efficiently represent complex probability distributions.

The authors first train an SPN on the observed data using standard techniques. This SPN then serves as a generative model, allowing the authors to sample new data points that are likely under the learned distribution. These sampled data points represent the counterfactuals.

To ensure the counterfactuals are both plausible and informative, the authors introduce several constraints and objectives. For example, they require the counterfactuals to be close to the original data in some metric, but also sufficiently different to represent meaningful changes. They also explore ways to incorporate causal information, as in this work on causality-constrained counterfactuals.

Through experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets, the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach. They show that the generated counterfactuals are realistic and cover a diverse range of possibilities, as compared to other counterfactual generation methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for generating plausible and informative counterfactuals using SPNs. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. The authors focus on generating individual counterfactuals, but in many applications, it may be more useful to generate a diverse set of counterfactuals, as explored in this work on the "explanatory multiverse".

  2. The paper does not address the issue of the computational complexity of training SPNs, which can be challenging for large-scale datasets. Techniques like this two-stage algorithm for efficient multi-instance counterfactual generation may help address this.

  3. The authors mention the importance of incorporating causal information, but do not provide a detailed exploration of how to do this effectively. This work on the formal foundations and priorities for counterfactual explanations may provide useful insights.

  4. The paper focuses on generating counterfactuals, but does not address the issue of how to effectively communicate and interpret these counterfactuals, which is a critical aspect of their practical utility.

Overall, the paper presents an interesting and valuable contribution to the field of counterfactual generation, but there are several avenues for further research and improvement.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel approach for generating plausible and informative counterfactuals using Sum-Product Networks (SPNs). By modeling the data distribution with an SPN and then sampling from this distribution, the authors are able to generate counterfactuals that are both realistic and meaningful.

The key innovation is the use of SPNs, which are well-suited for modeling complex probability distributions. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on both synthetic and real-world datasets, showing that the generated counterfactuals cover a diverse range of possibilities while remaining similar to the observed data.

While the paper presents a promising step forward, there are several areas for further research, such as generating diverse sets of counterfactuals, addressing computational complexity, and better incorporating causal information. Overall, this work contributes to the growing field of counterfactual generation, which has important applications in explainable AI, decision-making, and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Generating Likely Counterfactuals Using Sum-Product Networks
Total Score

0

Generating Likely Counterfactuals Using Sum-Product Networks

Jiri Nemecek, Tomas Pevny, Jakub Marecek

Explainability of decisions made by AI systems is driven by both recent regulation and user demand. These decisions are often explainable only emph{post hoc}, after the fact. In counterfactual explanations, one may ask what constitutes the best counterfactual explanation. Clearly, multiple criteria must be taken into account, although distance from the sample is a key criterion. Recent methods that consider the plausibility of a counterfactual seem to sacrifice this original objective. Here, we present a system that provides high-likelihood explanations that are, at the same time, close and sparse. We show that the search for the most likely explanations satisfying many common desiderata for counterfactual explanations can be modeled using mixed-integer optimization (MIO). In the process, we propose an MIO formulation of a Sum-Product Network (SPN) and use the SPN to estimate the likelihood of a counterfactual, which can be of independent interest.

Read more

5/28/2024

A multi-criteria approach for selecting an explanation from the set of counterfactuals produced by an ensemble of explainers
Total Score

0

A multi-criteria approach for selecting an explanation from the set of counterfactuals produced by an ensemble of explainers

Ignacy Stk{e}pka, Mateusz Lango, Jerzy Stefanowski

Counterfactuals are widely used to explain ML model predictions by providing alternative scenarios for obtaining the more desired predictions. They can be generated by a variety of methods that optimize different, sometimes conflicting, quality measures and produce quite different solutions. However, choosing the most appropriate explanation method and one of the generated counterfactuals is not an easy task. Instead of forcing the user to test many different explanation methods and analysing conflicting solutions, in this paper, we propose to use a multi-stage ensemble approach that will select single counterfactual based on the multiple-criteria analysis. It offers a compromise solution that scores well on several popular quality measures. This approach exploits the dominance relation and the ideal point decision aid method, which selects one counterfactual from the Pareto front. The conducted experiments demonstrated that the proposed approach generates fully actionable counterfactuals with attractive compromise values of the considered quality measures.

Read more

8/6/2024

Top-Down Bayesian Posterior Sampling for Sum-Product Networks
Total Score

0

Top-Down Bayesian Posterior Sampling for Sum-Product Networks

Soma Yokoi, Issei Sato

Sum-product networks (SPNs) are probabilistic models characterized by exact and fast evaluation of fundamental probabilistic operations. Its superior computational tractability has led to applications in many fields, such as machine learning with time constraints or accuracy requirements and real-time systems. The structural constraints of SPNs supporting fast inference, however, lead to increased learning-time complexity and can be an obstacle to building highly expressive SPNs. This study aimed to develop a Bayesian learning approach that can be efficiently implemented on large-scale SPNs. We derived a new full conditional probability of Gibbs sampling by marginalizing multiple random variables to expeditiously obtain the posterior distribution. The complexity analysis revealed that our sampling algorithm works efficiently even for the largest possible SPN. Furthermore, we proposed a hyperparameter tuning method that balances the diversity of the prior distribution and optimization efficiency in large-scale SPNs. Our method has improved learning-time complexity and demonstrated computational speed tens to more than one hundred times faster and superior predictive performance in numerical experiments on more than 20 datasets.

Read more

6/19/2024

CoGS: Causality Constrained Counterfactual Explanations using goal-directed ASP
Total Score

0

CoGS: Causality Constrained Counterfactual Explanations using goal-directed ASP

Sopam Dasgupta, Joaqu'in Arias, Elmer Salazar, Gopal Gupta

Machine learning models are increasingly used in areas such as loan approvals and hiring, yet they often function as black boxes, obscuring their decision-making processes. Transparency is crucial, and individuals need explanations to understand decisions, especially for the ones not desired by the user. Ethical and legal considerations require informing individuals of changes in input attribute values (features) that could lead to a desired outcome for the user. Our work aims to generate counterfactual explanations by considering causal dependencies between features. We present the CoGS (Counterfactual Generation with s(CASP)) framework that utilizes the goal-directed Answer Set Programming system s(CASP) to generate counterfactuals from rule-based machine learning models, specifically the FOLD-SE algorithm. CoGS computes realistic and causally consistent changes to attribute values taking causal dependencies between them into account. It finds a path from an undesired outcome to a desired one using counterfactuals. We present details of the CoGS framework along with its evaluation.

Read more

7/12/2024