Generating Situated Reflection Triggers about Alternative Solution Paths: A Case Study of Generative AI for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
2404.18262
0
0
Abstract
An advantage of Large Language Models (LLMs) is their contextualization capability - providing different responses based on student inputs like solution strategy or prior discussion, to potentially better engage students than standard feedback. We present a design and evaluation of a proof-of-concept LLM application to offer students dynamic and contextualized feedback. Specifically, we augment an Online Programming Exercise bot for a college-level Cloud Computing course with ChatGPT, which offers students contextualized reflection triggers during a collaborative query optimization task in database design. We demonstrate that LLMs can be used to generate highly situated reflection triggers that incorporate details of the collaborative discussion happening in context. We discuss in depth the exploration of the design space of the triggers and their correspondence with the learning objectives as well as the impact on student learning in a pilot study with 34 students.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of Generative AI to create "situated reflection triggers" - prompts that encourage learners to consider alternative solution paths during collaborative learning tasks.
- The researchers conducted a case study to investigate the effectiveness of this approach in a computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) context.
- The goal was to provide dynamic support to learners by suggesting alternative perspectives and ideas to consider, without being overly prescriptive.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this study wanted to see if Generative AI could be used to help students learn better in group settings. They created a system that would automatically generate prompts or "triggers" for students to reflect on during their collaborative work. The idea was to get students to think about different ways to solve the problem they were working on, without the system telling them exactly what to do.
For example, if a group of students were trying to design a new app, the Generative AI system might suggest they consider how the app could be used by people with disabilities, or how it could be made more environmentally friendly. The goal was to encourage the students to broaden their thinking and consider alternative approaches, rather than getting stuck on one solution.
The researchers tested this approach in a real-world CSCL (computer-supported collaborative learning) setting, to see if it would actually help students learn more effectively when working together on complex problems. By using Generative AI to provide these "reflection triggers," they hoped to create a more dynamic and flexible learning environment that supported critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed a system that used Generative AI models to automatically generate situated reflection triggers (SRTs) - prompts that encouraged learners to consider alternative solution paths during a CSCL activity.
The system first analyzed the current state of the collaborative learning task, including the learners' contributions and the problem they were working on. It then used language models to generate SRTs that highlighted potential alternative approaches or perspectives the learners had not yet considered.
These SRTs were then presented to the learners at appropriate times during the CSCL activity, with the goal of stimulating reflection and problem-solving without being overly prescriptive.
The researchers conducted a case study to evaluate the effectiveness of this approach in a real-world CSCL setting. They analyzed the learners' interactions, the quality of their solutions, and their perceptions of the SRT system.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledged several limitations of their study, including the small sample size and the fact that it was a single case study. They also noted that the effectiveness of the SRT system may depend on the specific learning context and the nature of the collaborative task.
Additionally, the researchers did not directly compare the performance of the Generative AI-based SRT system to other forms of scaffolding or support that might be provided to learners in a CSCL setting. Further research would be needed to determine the relative merits of this approach compared to other interventions.
It's also important to consider potential biases or limitations in the Generative AI models used to generate the SRTs. As with any AI system, there may be concerns around fairness, transparency, and the potential for unintended consequences that would need to be carefully evaluated.
Conclusion
This research represents an interesting exploration of how Generative AI can be leveraged to provide dynamic support for collaborative learning. The idea of using AI-generated prompts to encourage learners to consider alternative solution paths is a novel approach that has the potential to enhance critical thinking and problem-solving skills in CSCL settings.
While the case study findings were promising, further research is needed to fully understand the benefits and limitations of this approach. Continued experimentation and evaluation in diverse learning contexts will be important to assess the broader applicability and effectiveness of Generative AI-powered situated reflection triggers.
Overall, this work highlights the potential for Generative AI to transform the way we approach computer-supported collaborative learning, moving towards more flexible and adaptive forms of guidance and support for learners.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Supporting Self-Reflection at Scale with Large Language Models: Insights from Randomized Field Experiments in Classrooms
Harsh Kumar, Ruiwei Xiao, Benjamin Lawson, Ilya Musabirov, Jiakai Shi, Xinyuan Wang, Huayin Luo, Joseph Jay Williams, Anna Rafferty, John Stamper, Michael Liut
0
0
Self-reflection on learning experiences constitutes a fundamental cognitive process, essential for the consolidation of knowledge and the enhancement of learning efficacy. However, traditional methods to facilitate reflection often face challenges in personalization, immediacy of feedback, engagement, and scalability. Integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into the reflection process could mitigate these limitations. In this paper, we conducted two randomized field experiments in undergraduate computer science courses to investigate the potential of LLMs to help students engage in post-lesson reflection. In the first experiment (N=145), students completed a take-home assignment with the support of an LLM assistant; half of these students were then provided access to an LLM designed to facilitate self-reflection. The results indicated that the students assigned to LLM-guided reflection reported increased self-confidence and performed better on a subsequent exam two weeks later than their peers in the control condition. In the second experiment (N=112), we evaluated the impact of LLM-guided self-reflection against other scalable reflection methods, such as questionnaire-based activities and review of key lecture slides, after assignment. Our findings suggest that the students in the questionnaire and LLM-based reflection groups performed equally well and better than those who were only exposed to lecture slides, according to their scores on a proctored exam two weeks later on the same subject matter. These results underscore the utility of LLM-guided reflection and questionnaire-based activities in improving learning outcomes. Our work highlights that focusing solely on the accuracy of LLMs can overlook their potential to enhance metacognitive skills through practices such as self-reflection. We discuss the implications of our research for the Edtech community.
6/13/2024
A review on the use of large language models as virtual tutors
Silvia Garc'ia-M'endez, Francisco de Arriba-P'erez, Mar'ia del Carmen Somoza-L'opez
0
0
Transformer architectures contribute to managing long-term dependencies for Natural Language Processing, representing one of the most recent changes in the field. These architectures are the basis of the innovative, cutting-edge Large Language Models (LLMs) that have produced a huge buzz in several fields and industrial sectors, among the ones education stands out. Accordingly, these generative Artificial Intelligence-based solutions have directed the change in techniques and the evolution in educational methods and contents, along with network infrastructure, towards high-quality learning. Given the popularity of LLMs, this review seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of those solutions designed specifically to generate and evaluate educational materials and which involve students and teachers in their design or experimental plan. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review of educational applications (e.g., student assessment) of LLMs. As expected, the most common role of these systems is as virtual tutors for automatic question generation. Moreover, the most popular models are GTP-3 and BERT. However, due to the continuous launch of new generative models, new works are expected to be published shortly.
5/21/2024
💬
Exploring the Capabilities of Prompted Large Language Models in Educational and Assessment Applications
Subhankar Maity, Aniket Deroy, Sudeshna Sarkar
0
0
In the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI), the fusion of large language models (LLMs) offers unprecedented opportunities for innovation in the field of modern education. We embark on an exploration of prompted LLMs within the context of educational and assessment applications to uncover their potential. Through a series of carefully crafted research questions, we investigate the effectiveness of prompt-based techniques in generating open-ended questions from school-level textbooks, assess their efficiency in generating open-ended questions from undergraduate-level technical textbooks, and explore the feasibility of employing a chain-of-thought inspired multi-stage prompting approach for language-agnostic multiple-choice question (MCQ) generation. Additionally, we evaluate the ability of prompted LLMs for language learning, exemplified through a case study in the low-resource Indian language Bengali, to explain Bengali grammatical errors. We also evaluate the potential of prompted LLMs to assess human resource (HR) spoken interview transcripts. By juxtaposing the capabilities of LLMs with those of human experts across various educational tasks and domains, our aim is to shed light on the potential and limitations of LLMs in reshaping educational practices.
5/21/2024
Large Language Models Enable Automated Formative Feedback in Human-Robot Interaction Tasks
Emily Jensen, Sriram Sankaranarayanan, Bradley Hayes
0
0
We claim that LLMs can be paired with formal analysis methods to provide accessible, relevant feedback for HRI tasks. While logic specifications are useful for defining and assessing a task, these representations are not easily interpreted by non-experts. Luckily, LLMs are adept at generating easy-to-understand text that explains difficult concepts. By integrating task assessment outcomes and other contextual information into an LLM prompt, we can effectively synthesize a useful set of recommendations for the learner to improve their performance.
5/28/2024