Generating Synthetic Free-text Medical Records with Low Re-identification Risk using Masked Language Modeling
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Researchers developed a method to generate synthetic medical records with low risk of re-identification.
- They used masked language modeling, a technique that can learn to generate realistic text by predicting missing words in a passage.
- The generated records aim to preserve the statistical properties of real medical data while protecting patient privacy.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers wanted to create fake medical records that looked real, but couldn't be traced back to actual patients. To do this, they used a machine learning technique called masked language modeling. This allows a model to learn how to generate realistic text by predicting missing words in a passage.
By training the model on a large dataset of real medical records, they were able to create new, synthetic records that have similar statistical properties to the original data. This means the fake records resemble real ones in terms of things like the types of medical conditions, treatments, and language used.
However, the generated records don't contain any information that could be traced back to actual patients. This helps protect people's privacy while still allowing the synthetic data to be useful for tasks like training other AI models or testing medical software.
Technical Explanation
The researchers employed a masked language modeling approach to generate the synthetic medical records. This involves training a language model to predict missing words in a given text passage. By masking out random words during training, the model learns to generate coherent text that resembles the original data distribution.
They fine-tuned a pre-trained language model on a large corpus of real medical records. This allowed the model to capture the statistical properties and linguistic patterns of authentic clinical notes. When generating new text, the model would predict the most likely words to fill in the masked positions, resulting in synthetic records that preserve important characteristics of the original data.
The researchers evaluated the generated records using metrics like perplexity (how surprised the model is by the text) and a re-identification risk score. They found the synthetic data had a low risk of being traced back to real patients while maintaining statistical fidelity to the original medical records.
Critical Analysis
One key limitation noted in the paper is that the synthetic records may not capture the full complexity and nuance of real clinical notes. The language model, while powerful, may struggle to replicate rare medical terms, subtle contextual cues, or the diverse writing styles of different healthcare providers.
Additionally, the researchers acknowledge that their re-identification risk metric may not fully capture all potential privacy threats. Adversarial attacks or sophisticated de-anonymization techniques could potentially be used to link the synthetic data back to real patients, despite the protections in place.
Further research is needed to explore more robust privacy-preserving techniques, such as incorporating differential privacy guarantees into the generation process. Evaluating the utility of the synthetic data for downstream healthcare applications is also an important area for future work.
Conclusion
This research demonstrates a promising approach to generating realistic, yet privacy-preserving, synthetic medical records using masked language modeling. By training on large datasets of real clinical notes, the researchers were able to create new records that maintain the statistical properties of the original data while minimizing re-identification risk.
While not a perfect solution, this work represents an important step forward in balancing the need for high-quality healthcare data with the imperative to protect patient privacy. As AI and machine learning continue to transform the medical field, techniques like this will be crucial for unlocking the full potential of health data while safeguarding individual rights and well-being.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
New!Generating Synthetic Free-text Medical Records with Low Re-identification Risk using Masked Language Modeling
Samuel Belkadi, Libo Ren, Nicolo Micheletti, Lifeng Han, Goran Nenadic
In this paper, we present a system that generates synthetic free-text medical records, such as discharge summaries, admission notes and doctor correspondences, using Masked Language Modeling (MLM). Our system is designed to preserve the critical information of the records while introducing significant diversity and minimizing re-identification risk. The system incorporates a de-identification component that uses Philter to mask Protected Health Information (PHI), followed by a Medical Entity Recognition (NER) model to retain key medical information. We explore various masking ratios and mask-filling techniques to balance the trade-off between diversity and fidelity in the synthetic outputs without affecting overall readability. Our results demonstrate that the system can produce high-quality synthetic data with significant diversity while achieving a HIPAA-compliant PHI recall rate of 0.96 and a low re-identification risk of 0.035. Furthermore, downstream evaluations using a NER task reveal that the synthetic data can be effectively used to train models with performance comparable to those trained on real data. The flexibility of the system allows it to be adapted for specific use cases, making it a valuable tool for privacy-preserving data generation in medical research and healthcare applications.
Read more9/18/2024
💬
0
Robust Privacy Amidst Innovation with Large Language Models Through a Critical Assessment of the Risks
Yao-Shun Chuang, Atiquer Rahman Sarkar, Yu-Chun Hsu, Noman Mohammed, Xiaoqian Jiang
This study examines integrating EHRs and NLP with large language models (LLMs) to improve healthcare data management and patient care. It focuses on using advanced models to create secure, HIPAA-compliant synthetic patient notes for biomedical research. The study used de-identified and re-identified MIMIC III datasets with GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Mistral 7B to generate synthetic notes. Text generation employed templates and keyword extraction for contextually relevant notes, with one-shot generation for comparison. Privacy assessment checked PHI occurrence, while text utility was tested using an ICD-9 coding task. Text quality was evaluated with ROUGE and cosine similarity metrics to measure semantic similarity with source notes. Analysis of PHI occurrence and text utility via the ICD-9 coding task showed that the keyword-based method had low risk and good performance. One-shot generation showed the highest PHI exposure and PHI co-occurrence, especially in geographic location and date categories. The Normalized One-shot method achieved the highest classification accuracy. Privacy analysis revealed a critical balance between data utility and privacy protection, influencing future data use and sharing. Re-identified data consistently outperformed de-identified data. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of keyword-based methods in generating privacy-protecting synthetic clinical notes that retain data usability, potentially transforming clinical data-sharing practices. The superior performance of re-identified over de-identified data suggests a shift towards methods that enhance utility and privacy by using dummy PHIs to perplex privacy attacks.
Read more9/17/2024
0
New!Synthetic4Health: Generating Annotated Synthetic Clinical Letters
Libo Ren, Samuel Belkadi, Lifeng Han, Warren Del-Pinto, Goran Nenadic
Since clinical letters contain sensitive information, clinical-related datasets can not be widely applied in model training, medical research, and teaching. This work aims to generate reliable, various, and de-identified synthetic clinical letters. To achieve this goal, we explored different pre-trained language models (PLMs) for masking and generating text. After that, we worked on Bio_ClinicalBERT, a high-performing model, and experimented with different masking strategies. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used for evaluation. Additionally, a downstream task, Named Entity Recognition (NER), was also implemented to assess the usability of these synthetic letters. The results indicate that 1) encoder-only models outperform encoder-decoder models. 2) Among encoder-only models, those trained on general corpora perform comparably to those trained on clinical data when clinical information is preserved. 3) Additionally, preserving clinical entities and document structure better aligns with our objectives than simply fine-tuning the model. 4) Furthermore, different masking strategies can impact the quality of synthetic clinical letters. Masking stopwords has a positive impact, while masking nouns or verbs has a negative effect. 5) For evaluation, BERTScore should be the primary quantitative evaluation metric, with other metrics serving as supplementary references. 6) Contextual information does not significantly impact the models' understanding, so the synthetic clinical letters have the potential to replace the original ones in downstream tasks.
Read more9/17/2024
0
Controllable Synthetic Clinical Note Generation with Privacy Guarantees
Tal Baumel (Ari), Andre Manoel (Ari), Daniel Jones (Ari), Shize Su (Ari), Huseyin Inan (Ari), Aaron (Ari), Bornstein, Robert Sim
In the field of machine learning, domain-specific annotated data is an invaluable resource for training effective models. However, in the medical domain, this data often includes Personal Health Information (PHI), raising significant privacy concerns. The stringent regulations surrounding PHI limit the availability and sharing of medical datasets, which poses a substantial challenge for researchers and practitioners aiming to develop advanced machine learning models. In this paper, we introduce a novel method to clone datasets containing PHI. Our approach ensures that the cloned datasets retain the essential characteristics and utility of the original data without compromising patient privacy. By leveraging differential-privacy techniques and a novel fine-tuning task, our method produces datasets that are free from identifiable information while preserving the statistical properties necessary for model training. We conduct utility testing to evaluate the performance of machine learning models trained on the cloned datasets. The results demonstrate that our cloned datasets not only uphold privacy standards but also enhance model performance compared to those trained on traditional anonymized datasets. This work offers a viable solution for the ethical and effective utilization of sensitive medical data in machine learning, facilitating progress in medical research and the development of robust predictive models.
Read more9/14/2024