Generative AI as a Learning Buddy and Teaching Assistant: Pre-service Teachers' Uses and Attitudes

Read original: arXiv:2407.11983 - Published 7/18/2024 by Matthew Nyaaba, Lehong Shi, Macharious Nabang, Xiaoming Zhai, Patrick Kyeremeh, Samuel Arthur Ayoberd, Bismark Nyaaba Akanzire
Total Score

0

Generative AI as a Learning Buddy and Teaching Assistant: Pre-service Teachers' Uses and Attitudes

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Explores pre-service teachers' use and attitudes towards Generative AI (GenAI) as a learning tool and teaching assistant
  • Investigates how pre-service teachers perceive and utilize GenAI in their educational practices
  • Provides insights into the role of GenAI in shaping pre-service teachers' professional development and classroom dynamics

Plain English Explanation

This research paper examines how pre-service teachers, or student teachers, view and use Generative AI (GenAI) technology in their learning and teaching. GenAI refers to advanced AI systems that can generate human-like text, images, and other content. The researchers wanted to understand how pre-service teachers perceive the usefulness and implications of GenAI in education.

The study looks at pre-service teachers' experiences with using GenAI as a "learning buddy" to support their own learning, as well as a "teaching assistant" to aid in their instructional practices. The researchers explored the pre-service teachers' attitudes towards GenAI, such as their level of comfort, perceived benefits, and any concerns they might have.

The findings from this research can help educators and policymakers better understand how GenAI is being integrated into teacher education and the potential impact it may have on the teaching profession. By understanding pre-service teachers' perspectives, the education community can develop strategies to effectively leverage GenAI while addressing any challenges or ethical considerations that may arise.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a qualitative study involving focus groups and individual interviews with pre-service teachers. They sought to explore the pre-service teachers' use of GenAI as a learning tool and their attitudes towards the technology's role as a teaching assistant.

The study used a phenomenological approach to understand the pre-service teachers' lived experiences and perceptions of GenAI in the context of their professional development and classroom practices. The researchers analyzed the interview data using thematic analysis to identify key themes and patterns.

The findings suggest that pre-service teachers see both benefits and challenges in using GenAI. They reported using GenAI to support their own learning, such as generating summaries, providing explanations, and generating ideas for lesson plans. At the same time, they expressed concerns about the ethical implications of using GenAI, such as issues of academic integrity, plagiarism, and the potential for GenAI to replace human teachers.

The study also revealed that pre-service teachers' attitudes towards GenAI were influenced by their level of familiarity with the technology, their teaching experience, and their personal beliefs about the role of technology in education. The researchers proposed a framework for understanding teacher agency in the age of GenAI, which highlights the need for teacher education programs to address the implications of GenAI and support pre-service teachers in developing strategies for its ethical and effective use.

Critical Analysis

The study provides valuable insights into the perspectives of pre-service teachers, who represent the next generation of educators. However, it is important to note that the research was conducted with a relatively small sample size and in a specific geographical context. Therefore, the findings may not be fully generalizable to all pre-service teachers or educational contexts.

Additionally, the study focused on pre-service teachers' perceptions and experiences, but it did not explore the actual impact of GenAI on student learning outcomes or the long-term implications for the teaching profession. Further research is needed to investigate these areas and to understand the perceptions and experiences of students and academic staff regarding the use of GenAI in education.

It is also worth considering the evolving nature of learning and assessment in the age of GenAI, and how teacher education programs can adapt to prepare pre-service teachers to navigate this rapidly changing landscape effectively and ethically.

Conclusion

This research provides valuable insights into how pre-service teachers perceive and utilize Generative AI (GenAI) in their learning and teaching practices. The findings suggest that while pre-service teachers recognize the potential benefits of GenAI, they also have concerns about the ethical implications and the impact on the teaching profession.

The study highlights the need for teacher education programs to address the implications of GenAI and support pre-service teachers in developing strategies for its effective and ethical use. By understanding the perspectives of pre-service teachers, the education community can work towards integrating GenAI in a way that enhances teaching and learning, while addressing the critical challenges and concerns that arise.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Generative AI as a Learning Buddy and Teaching Assistant: Pre-service Teachers' Uses and Attitudes
Total Score

0

Generative AI as a Learning Buddy and Teaching Assistant: Pre-service Teachers' Uses and Attitudes

Matthew Nyaaba, Lehong Shi, Macharious Nabang, Xiaoming Zhai, Patrick Kyeremeh, Samuel Arthur Ayoberd, Bismark Nyaaba Akanzire

To uncover pre-service teachers' (PSTs') user experience and perceptions of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) applications, we surveyed 167 Ghana PSTs' specific uses of GenAI as a learning buddy and teaching assistant, and their attitudes towards these applications. Employing exploratory factor analysis (EFA), we identified three key factors shaping PSTs' attitudes towards GenAI: teaching, learning, and ethical and advocacy factors. The mean scores of these factors revealed a generally positive attitude towards GenAI, indicating high levels of agreement on its potential to enhance PSTs' content knowledge and access to learning and teaching resources, thereby reducing their need for assistance from colleagues. Specifically, PSTs use GenAI as a learning buddy to access reading materials, in-depth content explanations, and practical examples, and as a teaching assistant to enhance teaching resources, develop assessment strategies, and plan lessons. A regression analysis showed that background factors such as age, gender, and year of study do not predict PSTs' attitudes towards GenAI, but age and year of study significantly predict the frequency of their use of GenAI, while gender does not. These findings suggest that older PSTs and those further along in their teacher education programs may use GenAI more frequently, but their perceptions of the application remain unchanged. However, PSTs expressed concerns about the accuracy and trustworthiness of the information provided by GenAI applications. We, therefore, suggest addressing these concerns to ensure PSTs can confidently rely on these applications in their teacher preparation programs. Additionally, we recommend targeted strategies to integrate GenAI more effectively into both learning and teaching processes for PSTs.

Read more

7/18/2024

Generative AI and Teachers -- For Us or Against Us? A Case Study
Total Score

0

Generative AI and Teachers -- For Us or Against Us? A Case Study

Jenny Pettersson, Elias Hult, Tim Eriksson, Tosin Adewumi

We present insightful results of a survey on the adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) by university teachers in their teaching activities. The transformation of education by GenAI, particularly large language models (LLMs), has been presenting both opportunities and challenges, including cheating by students. We prepared the online survey according to best practices and the questions were created by the authors, who have pedagogy experience. The survey contained 12 questions and a pilot study was first conducted. The survey was then sent to all teachers in multiple departments across different campuses of the university of interest in Sweden: Lule{aa} University of Technology. The survey was available in both Swedish and English. The results show that 35 teachers (more than half) use GenAI out of 67 respondents. Preparation is the teaching activity with the most frequency that GenAI is used for and ChatGPT is the most commonly used GenAI. 59% say it has impacted their teaching, however, 55% say there should be legislation around the use of GenAI, especially as inaccuracies and cheating are the biggest concerns.

Read more

4/5/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

A Systematic Review of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning Practice

Bayode Ogunleye, Kudirat Ibilola Zakariyyah, Oluwaseun Ajao, Olakunle Olayinka, Hemlata Sharma

The use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in academia is a subjective and hotly debated topic. Currently, there are no agreed guidelines towards the usage of GenAI systems in higher education (HE) and, thus, it is still unclear how to make effective use of the technology for teaching and learning practice. This paper provides an overview of the current state of research on GenAI for teaching and learning in HE. To this end, this study conducted a systematic review of relevant studies indexed by Scopus, using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search criteria revealed a total of 625 research papers, of which 355 met the final inclusion criteria. The findings from the review showed the current state and the future trends in documents, citations, document sources/authors, keywords, and co-authorship. The research gaps identified suggest that while some authors have looked at understanding the detection of AI-generated text, it may be beneficial to understand how GenAI can be incorporated into supporting the educational curriculum for assessments, teaching, and learning delivery. Furthermore, there is a need for additional interdisciplinary, multidimensional studies in HE through collaboration. This will strengthen the awareness and understanding of students, tutors, and other stakeholders, which will be instrumental in formulating guidelines, frameworks, and policies for GenAI usage.

Read more

6/17/2024

Total Score

0

Teacher agency in the age of generative AI: towards a framework of hybrid intelligence for learning design

Thomas B Fr{o}sig (UniCA, LINE), Margarida Romero (UniCA, LINE)

Generative AI (genAI) is being used in education for different purposes. From the teachers' perspective, genAI can support activities such as learning design. However, there is a need to study the impact of genAI on the teachers' agency. While GenAI can support certain processes of idea generation and co-creation, GenAI has the potential to negatively affect professional agency due to teachers' limited power to (i) act, (ii) affect matters, and (iii) make decisions or choices, as well as the possibility to (iv) take a stance. Agency is identified in the learning sciences studies as being one of the factors in teachers' ability to trust AI. This paper aims to introduce a dual perspective. First, educational technology, as opposed to other computer-mediated communication (CMC) tools, has two distinctly different user groups and different user needs, in the form of learners and teachers, to cater for. Second, the design of educational technology often prioritises learner agency and engagement, thereby limiting the opportunities for teachers to influence the technology and take action. This study aims to analyse the way GenAI is influencing teachers' agency. After identifying the current limits of GenAI, a solution based on the combination of human intelligence and artificial intelligence through a hybrid intelligence approach is proposed. This combination opens up the discussion of a collaboration between teacher and genAI being able to open up new practices in learning design in which they HI support the extension of the teachers' activity.

Read more

7/10/2024