Generative AI and the problem of existential risk
0
🤖
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Since the launch of ChatGPT, concerns about the existential risks of Generative AI have become a major focus.
- This topic, once niche in AI research and philosophy, has now entered mainstream debate among policymakers and leading foundation models developers.
- This chapter aims to demystify the debate by highlighting the key worries about existential risk from generative AI and the actions governments and industry are taking to address them.
Plain English Explanation
The development of powerful generative AI models like ChatGPT has sparked widespread concerns about the potential existential risks these technologies could pose. This issue, which was previously confined to academic discussions in AI research and philosophy, has now become a central topic of debate among policymakers and the companies building these advanced AI systems.
The goal of this chapter is to provide a clear and accessible explanation of the main concerns underlying the fears about existential risk from generative AI, as well as the key steps that governments and industry are taking so far to try and address these challenges. By demystifying this complex and often technical debate, the chapter aims to help readers better understand the stakes involved and the efforts underway to ensure these powerful AI models are developed and deployed safely.
Technical Explanation
The rapid progress in generative AI models has thrust the topic of AI safety and existential risk into the mainstream. Once a niche area of AI research and philosophical discussion, these concerns are now a central focus for policymakers and the companies building foundation models - much to the chagrin of those who view it as a distraction from more immediate harms.
This chapter aims to demystify this debate by highlighting the key worries that underpin fears about existential risk from generative AI. It also spotlights the actions that governments and industry are taking to try and address these challenges. By providing a clear and accessible explanation of these complex issues, the chapter seeks to help readers better understand the stakes involved and the ongoing efforts to ensure these powerful AI systems are developed and deployed safely.
Critical Analysis
The chapter's attempt to demystify the debate around existential risk from generative AI is a valuable contribution, as this is a topic that can be highly technical and difficult for non-experts to navigate. By clearly outlining the key concerns and the actions being taken by authorities, the chapter helps make these important issues more accessible to a wider audience.
However, the analysis could be strengthened by more explicitly acknowledging some of the caveats and limitations in the current understanding of existential risk from these technologies. The field is still evolving, and there is ongoing debate and uncertainty around the exact nature and likelihood of such risks materializing.
Additionally, the chapter could benefit from a more critical examination of the actions being taken by governments and industry. While the overview of these efforts is useful, a more in-depth analysis of their effectiveness, potential shortcomings, and areas for further work would help readers assess the adequacy of the current response to these challenges.
Conclusion
This chapter provides a valuable overview of the debate around existential risk from generative AI, a topic that has risen to prominence in the wake of breakthroughs like ChatGPT. By demystifying the key concerns and the actions being taken to address them, the chapter helps make these complex issues more accessible to a general audience.
While the analysis could be strengthened by acknowledging some of the limitations and uncertainties in this rapidly evolving field, the chapter succeeds in its goal of providing a clear and informative overview of this important topic. As generative AI continues to advance, understanding and addressing the potential existential risks will be crucial to ensuring these powerful technologies are developed and deployed safely for the benefit of society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
0
Generative AI and the problem of existential risk
Lynette Webb, Daniel Schonberger
Ever since the launch of ChatGPT, Generative AI has been a focal point for concerns about AI's perceived existential risk. Once a niche topic in AI research and philosophy, AI safety and existential risk has now entered mainstream debate among policy makers and leading foundation models developers, much to the chagrin of those who see it as a distraction from addressing more pressing nearer-term harms. This chapter aims to demystify the debate by highlighting the key worries that underpin existential risk fears in relation to generative AI, and spotlighting the key actions that governments and industry are taking thus far to helping address them.
Read more7/19/2024
🤖
0
Is Generative AI an Existential Threat to Human Creatives? Insights from Financial Economics
Jiasun Li
With the phenomenal rise of generative AI models (e.g., large language models such as GPT or large image models such as Diffusion), there are increasing concerns about human creatives' futures. Specifically, as generative models' power further increases, will they eventually replace all human creatives' jobs? We argue that the answer is no, even if existing generative AI models' capabilities reach their theoretical limit. Our theory has a close analogy to a familiar insight in financial economics on the impossibility of an informationally efficient market [Grossman and Stiglitz (1980)]: If generative AI models can provide all the content humans need at low variable costs, then there is no incentive for humans to spend costly resources on content creation as they cannot profit from it. But if no human creates new content, then generative AI can only learn from stale information and be unable to generate up-to-date content that reflects new happenings in the physical world. This creates a paradox.
Read more7/30/2024
🤖
1
Is Power-Seeking AI an Existential Risk?
Joseph Carlsmith
This report examines what I see as the core argument for concern about existential risk from misaligned artificial intelligence. I proceed in two stages. First, I lay out a backdrop picture that informs such concern. On this picture, intelligent agency is an extremely powerful force, and creating agents much more intelligent than us is playing with fire -- especially given that if their objectives are problematic, such agents would plausibly have instrumental incentives to seek power over humans. Second, I formulate and evaluate a more specific six-premise argument that creating agents of this kind will lead to existential catastrophe by 2070. On this argument, by 2070: (1) it will become possible and financially feasible to build relevantly powerful and agentic AI systems; (2) there will be strong incentives to do so; (3) it will be much harder to build aligned (and relevantly powerful/agentic) AI systems than to build misaligned (and relevantly powerful/agentic) AI systems that are still superficially attractive to deploy; (4) some such misaligned systems will seek power over humans in high-impact ways; (5) this problem will scale to the full disempowerment of humanity; and (6) such disempowerment will constitute an existential catastrophe. I assign rough subjective credences to the premises in this argument, and I end up with an overall estimate of ~5% that an existential catastrophe of this kind will occur by 2070. (May 2022 update: since making this report public in April 2021, my estimate here has gone up, and is now at >10%.)
Read more8/14/2024
🤖
0
Generative AI Models: Opportunities and Risks for Industry and Authorities
Tobias Alt, Andrea Ibisch, Clemens Meiser, Anna Wilhelm, Raphael Zimmer, Christian Berghoff, Christoph Droste, Jens Karschau, Friederike Laus, Rainer Plaga, Carola Plesch, Britta Sennewald, Thomas Thaeren, Kristina Unverricht, Steffen Waurick
Generative AI models are capable of performing a wide range of tasks that traditionally require creativity and human understanding. They learn patterns from existing data during training and can subsequently generate new content such as texts, images, and music that follow these patterns. Due to their versatility and generally high-quality results, they, on the one hand, represent an opportunity for digitalization. On the other hand, the use of generative AI models introduces novel IT security risks that need to be considered for a comprehensive analysis of the threat landscape in relation to IT security. In response to this risk potential, companies or authorities using them should conduct an individual risk analysis before integrating generative AI into their workflows. The same applies to developers and operators, as many risks in the context of generative AI have to be taken into account at the time of development or can only be influenced by the operating company. Based on this, existing security measures can be adjusted, and additional measures can be taken.
Read more6/10/2024