Generative Relevance Feedback and Convergence of Adaptive Re-Ranking: University of Glasgow Terrier Team at TREC DL 2023

Read original: arXiv:2405.01122 - Published 5/3/2024 by Andrew Parry, Thomas Jaenich, Sean MacAvaney, Iadh Ounis
Total Score

0

Generative Relevance Feedback and Convergence of Adaptive Re-Ranking: University of Glasgow Terrier Team at TREC DL 2023

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents the work of the University of Glasgow Terrier team for the TREC Deep Learning (DL) 2023 track.
  • The team explored the use of generative relevance feedback and adaptive re-ranking techniques to improve information retrieval performance.
  • The paper discusses the team's Pyterrier-based retrieval pipelines and the insights gained from their experiments.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers from the University of Glasgow Terrier team participated in the TREC Deep Learning (DL) 2023 competition, where they focused on improving information retrieval performance. They experimented with two key techniques:

  1. Generative Relevance Feedback: This approach involves using a language model to generate new, relevant queries based on the user's initial query and the feedback provided on the initial search results. The goal is to refine the query and retrieve more relevant information.

  2. Adaptive Re-Ranking: The team explored ways to continuously adapt and improve the ranking of search results, based on user feedback and other signals. This helps ensure that the most relevant information is presented to the user.

By incorporating these techniques into their Pyterrier-based retrieval pipelines, the researchers aimed to enhance the overall effectiveness and user experience of their information retrieval system.

Technical Explanation

The University of Glasgow Terrier team's approach to the TREC DL 2023 task involved the development of Pyterrier-based retrieval pipelines that leveraged generative relevance feedback and adaptive re-ranking techniques.

For generative relevance feedback, the team utilized large language models to generate new queries based on the initial user query and the relevance feedback provided on the initial search results. This allowed them to refine the query and potentially retrieve more relevant information, as described in the Evaluating Generative Ad-Hoc Information Retrieval and GenQRENSEMBLE: Zero-Shot LLM Ensemble Prompting for Generative papers.

The team also explored adaptive re-ranking, which involves continuously updating and improving the ranking of search results based on user feedback and other signals. This approach, known as Generative Information Retrieval Evaluation, aims to provide users with the most relevant information, even as their needs and preferences evolve.

Critical Analysis

The paper does not provide detailed information about the specific techniques or architectures used by the team, nor does it delve into the evaluation metrics and results of their experiments. This makes it challenging to assess the effectiveness and novelty of their approach compared to other state-of-the-art information retrieval systems.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential limitations or challenges encountered during the implementation and deployment of their generative relevance feedback and adaptive re-ranking techniques. It would be valuable to understand the trade-offs, such as the computational overhead or the ability to scale these approaches to large-scale retrieval tasks.

Further research could explore the integration of these techniques with other multi-modal retrieval and ranking approaches and investigate their performance in different information retrieval scenarios, including mixed-initiative query reformulation in conversational systems.

Conclusion

The University of Glasgow Terrier team's work on generative relevance feedback and adaptive re-ranking for the TREC DL 2023 competition showcases the potential of these techniques to enhance information retrieval performance. By leveraging large language models and continuous learning, the team aimed to provide users with more relevant and personalized search results.

While the paper lacks detailed technical information and insights, the underlying concepts and approaches are promising and could contribute to the ongoing research in the field of information retrieval. Further exploration and evaluation of these techniques in various real-world scenarios will be crucial to assess their practical impact and guide future developments in this domain.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Generative Relevance Feedback and Convergence of Adaptive Re-Ranking: University of Glasgow Terrier Team at TREC DL 2023
Total Score

0

Generative Relevance Feedback and Convergence of Adaptive Re-Ranking: University of Glasgow Terrier Team at TREC DL 2023

Andrew Parry, Thomas Jaenich, Sean MacAvaney, Iadh Ounis

This paper describes our participation in the TREC 2023 Deep Learning Track. We submitted runs that apply generative relevance feedback from a large language model in both a zero-shot and pseudo-relevance feedback setting over two sparse retrieval approaches, namely BM25 and SPLADE. We couple this first stage with adaptive re-ranking over a BM25 corpus graph scored using a monoELECTRA cross-encoder. We investigate the efficacy of these generative approaches for different query types in first-stage retrieval. In re-ranking, we investigate operating points of adaptive re-ranking with different first stages to find the point in graph traversal where the first stage no longer has an effect on the performance of the overall retrieval pipeline. We find some performance gains from the application of generative query reformulation. However, our strongest run in terms of P@10 and nDCG@10 applied both adaptive re-ranking and generative pseudo-relevance feedback, namely uogtr_b_grf_e_gb.

Read more

5/3/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

PASH at TREC 2021 Deep Learning Track: Generative Enhanced Model for Multi-stage Ranking

Yixuan Qiao, Hao Chen, Jun Wang, Tuozhen Liu, Xianbin Ye, Xin Tang, Rui Fang, Peng Gao, Wenfeng Xie, Guotong Xie

This paper describes the PASH participation in TREC 2021 Deep Learning Track. In the recall stage, we adopt a scheme combining sparse and dense retrieval method. In the multi-stage ranking phase, point-wise and pair-wise ranking strategies are used one after another based on model continual pre-trained on general knowledge and document-level data. Compared to TREC 2020 Deep Learning Track, we have additionally introduced the generative model T5 to further enhance the performance.

Read more

8/29/2024

Enhancing Knowledge Retrieval with In-Context Learning and Semantic Search through Generative AI
Total Score

0

Enhancing Knowledge Retrieval with In-Context Learning and Semantic Search through Generative AI

Mohammed-Khalil Ghali, Abdelrahman Farrag, Daehan Won, Yu Jin

Retrieving and extracting knowledge from extensive research documents and large databases presents significant challenges for researchers, students, and professionals in today's information-rich era. Existing retrieval systems, which rely on general-purpose Large Language Models (LLMs), often fail to provide accurate responses to domain-specific inquiries. Additionally, the high cost of pretraining or fine-tuning LLMs for specific domains limits their widespread adoption. To address these limitations, we propose a novel methodology that combines the generative capabilities of LLMs with the fast and accurate retrieval capabilities of vector databases. This advanced retrieval system can efficiently handle both tabular and non-tabular data, understand natural language user queries, and retrieve relevant information without fine-tuning. The developed model, Generative Text Retrieval (GTR), is adaptable to both unstructured and structured data with minor refinement. GTR was evaluated on both manually annotated and public datasets, achieving over 90% accuracy and delivering truthful outputs in 87% of cases. Our model achieved state-of-the-art performance with a Rouge-L F1 score of 0.98 on the MSMARCO dataset. The refined model, Generative Tabular Text Retrieval (GTR-T), demonstrated its efficiency in large database querying, achieving an Execution Accuracy (EX) of 0.82 and an Exact-Set-Match (EM) accuracy of 0.60 on the Spider dataset, using an open-source LLM. These efforts leverage Generative AI and In-Context Learning to enhance human-text interaction and make advanced AI capabilities more accessible. By integrating robust retrieval systems with powerful LLMs, our approach aims to democratize access to sophisticated AI tools, improving the efficiency, accuracy, and scalability of AI-driven information retrieval and database querying.

Read more

6/17/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

ReFIT: Relevance Feedback from a Reranker during Inference

Revanth Gangi Reddy, Pradeep Dasigi, Md Arafat Sultan, Arman Cohan, Avirup Sil, Heng Ji, Hannaneh Hajishirzi

Retrieve-and-rerank is a prevalent framework in neural information retrieval, wherein a bi-encoder network initially retrieves a pre-defined number of candidates (e.g., K=100), which are then reranked by a more powerful cross-encoder model. While the reranker often yields improved candidate scores compared to the retriever, its scope is confined to only the top K retrieved candidates. As a result, the reranker cannot improve retrieval performance in terms of Recall@K. In this work, we propose to leverage the reranker to improve recall by making it provide relevance feedback to the retriever at inference time. Specifically, given a test instance during inference, we distill the reranker's predictions for that instance into the retriever's query representation using a lightweight update mechanism. The aim of the distillation loss is to align the retriever's candidate scores more closely with those produced by the reranker. The algorithm then proceeds by executing a second retrieval step using the updated query vector. We empirically demonstrate that this method, applicable to various retrieve-and-rerank frameworks, substantially enhances retrieval recall across multiple domains, languages, and modalities.

Read more

5/29/2024