ReFIT: Relevance Feedback from a Reranker during Inference

Read original: arXiv:2305.11744 - Published 5/29/2024 by Revanth Gangi Reddy, Pradeep Dasigi, Md Arafat Sultan, Arman Cohan, Avirup Sil, Heng Ji, Hannaneh Hajishirzi
Total Score

0

🤯

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a novel approach to improve retrieval recall in the popular retrieve-and-rerank framework for neural information retrieval.
  • The key idea is to leverage the more powerful reranker model to provide relevance feedback to the initial retriever model, allowing the retriever to better align its candidate scores with the reranker's predictions.
  • The authors demonstrate that this method substantially enhances retrieval recall across multiple domains, languages, and modalities.

Plain English Explanation

In the field of neural information retrieval, a common approach is the "retrieve-and-rerank" framework. Here, a initial retriever model quickly finds a set of relevant candidates, which are then reranked by a more sophisticated reranker model to produce the final results.

While the reranker often improves the scores of the top-ranked candidates, it is limited to only refining the initial set of results retrieved by the first model. This means the reranker cannot actually improve the overall recall - the ability to retrieve relevant items in the first place.

To address this, the authors of this paper propose a novel technique that allows the reranker to provide feedback to the retriever model. Specifically, during inference, the reranker's predictions for a given query are distilled into the retriever's query representation using a lightweight update mechanism. This helps align the retriever's candidate scores more closely with the reranker's assessments.

The algorithm then proceeds to execute a second retrieval step using this updated query vector. The authors show that this approach, applicable to various retrieve-and-rerank frameworks, can significantly boost retrieval recall across a wide range of applications, including different domains, languages, and even modalities like images.

By leveraging the power of the reranker to improve the initial retriever, this method addresses a key limitation of the traditional retrieve-and-rerank pipeline, potentially leading to more effective and comprehensive information retrieval systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper focuses on the retrieve-and-rerank framework, a prevalent approach in neural information retrieval. In this framework, a bi-encoder retriever model first quickly finds a pre-defined number of candidate results (e.g., K=100). These candidates are then reranked by a more powerful cross-encoder reranker model to produce the final output.

While the reranker often improves the scores of the top-ranked candidates, its scope is confined to only the initial K retrieved items. As a result, the reranker cannot enhance retrieval performance in terms of Recall@K, which measures the ability to retrieve relevant items in the first place.

To address this limitation, the authors propose a method to leverage the reranker to improve the recall of the retriever. Specifically, during inference, the reranker's predictions for a given test instance are distilled into the retriever's query representation using a lightweight update mechanism. The aim of this distillation loss is to align the retriever's candidate scores more closely with those produced by the reranker.

After this update, the algorithm executes a second retrieval step using the modified query vector. The authors demonstrate empirically that this approach, which can be applied to various retrieve-and-rerank frameworks, substantially enhances retrieval recall across multiple domains, languages, and modalities.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and compelling approach to improving retrieval recall in the retrieve-and-rerank framework. By allowing the reranker to provide relevance feedback to the retriever, the authors overcome a key limitation of the traditional pipeline.

However, the paper does not extensively discuss potential caveats or limitations of the proposed method. For example, it is unclear how the distillation mechanism may scale or perform with larger retriever and reranker models, or how sensitive the approach is to the specific architectures and training regimes of the underlying models.

Additionally, while the authors demonstrate significant improvements in retrieval recall, the impact on other metrics, such as precision or ranking quality, is not fully explored. It would be valuable to understand the broader effects of this technique on the overall retrieval system performance.

Further research could also investigate how this approach might interact with or complement other techniques for improving retrieval, such as Revisiting Relevance Feedback in CLIP-based Interactive Image Retrieval, Generative Relevance Feedback for Convergence Adaptive Re-ranking, or Recall, Retrieve, and Reason: Towards Better Context Relation.

Overall, the paper presents a promising approach that could lead to more effective and comprehensive information retrieval systems. However, further exploration of its limitations, tradeoffs, and potential synergies with other techniques would be valuable for researchers and practitioners in this field.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel method to improve retrieval recall in the popular retrieve-and-rerank framework for neural information retrieval. By allowing the more powerful reranker model to provide relevance feedback to the initial retriever, the authors demonstrate a substantial enhancement in retrieval recall across multiple domains, languages, and modalities.

This work addresses a key limitation of the traditional retrieve-and-rerank pipeline, where the reranker is confined to only refining the top-ranked candidates. The proposed distillation-based approach enables the retriever to better align its candidate scores with the reranker's assessments, leading to improved overall retrieval performance.

The authors' findings highlight the potential benefits of leveraging the complementary strengths of retriever and reranker models to advance the state-of-the-art in neural information retrieval. Further research exploring the scalability, robustness, and synergies of this technique could yield valuable insights and spur the development of more effective and comprehensive retrieval systems, benefiting a wide range of applications that rely on accurate and comprehensive information retrieval.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

Total Score

0

ReFIT: Relevance Feedback from a Reranker during Inference

Revanth Gangi Reddy, Pradeep Dasigi, Md Arafat Sultan, Arman Cohan, Avirup Sil, Heng Ji, Hannaneh Hajishirzi

Retrieve-and-rerank is a prevalent framework in neural information retrieval, wherein a bi-encoder network initially retrieves a pre-defined number of candidates (e.g., K=100), which are then reranked by a more powerful cross-encoder model. While the reranker often yields improved candidate scores compared to the retriever, its scope is confined to only the top K retrieved candidates. As a result, the reranker cannot improve retrieval performance in terms of Recall@K. In this work, we propose to leverage the reranker to improve recall by making it provide relevance feedback to the retriever at inference time. Specifically, given a test instance during inference, we distill the reranker's predictions for that instance into the retriever's query representation using a lightweight update mechanism. The aim of the distillation loss is to align the retriever's candidate scores more closely with those produced by the reranker. The algorithm then proceeds by executing a second retrieval step using the updated query vector. We empirically demonstrate that this method, applicable to various retrieve-and-rerank frameworks, substantially enhances retrieval recall across multiple domains, languages, and modalities.

Read more

5/29/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

Revisiting Relevance Feedback for CLIP-based Interactive Image Retrieval

Ryoya Nara, Yu-Chieh Lin, Yuji Nozawa, Youyang Ng, Goh Itoh, Osamu Torii, Yusuke Matsui

Many image retrieval studies use metric learning to train an image encoder. However, metric learning cannot handle differences in users' preferences, and requires data to train an image encoder. To overcome these limitations, we revisit relevance feedback, a classic technique for interactive retrieval systems, and propose an interactive CLIP-based image retrieval system with relevance feedback. Our retrieval system first executes the retrieval, collects each user's unique preferences through binary feedback, and returns images the user prefers. Even when users have various preferences, our retrieval system learns each user's preference through the feedback and adapts to the preference. Moreover, our retrieval system leverages CLIP's zero-shot transferability and achieves high accuracy without training. We empirically show that our retrieval system competes well with state-of-the-art metric learning in category-based image retrieval, despite not training image encoders specifically for each dataset. Furthermore, we set up two additional experimental settings where users have various preferences: one-label-based image retrieval and conditioned image retrieval. In both cases, our retrieval system effectively adapts to each user's preferences, resulting in improved accuracy compared to image retrieval without feedback. Overall, our work highlights the potential benefits of integrating CLIP with classic relevance feedback techniques to enhance image retrieval.

Read more

9/25/2024

Generative Relevance Feedback and Convergence of Adaptive Re-Ranking: University of Glasgow Terrier Team at TREC DL 2023
Total Score

0

Generative Relevance Feedback and Convergence of Adaptive Re-Ranking: University of Glasgow Terrier Team at TREC DL 2023

Andrew Parry, Thomas Jaenich, Sean MacAvaney, Iadh Ounis

This paper describes our participation in the TREC 2023 Deep Learning Track. We submitted runs that apply generative relevance feedback from a large language model in both a zero-shot and pseudo-relevance feedback setting over two sparse retrieval approaches, namely BM25 and SPLADE. We couple this first stage with adaptive re-ranking over a BM25 corpus graph scored using a monoELECTRA cross-encoder. We investigate the efficacy of these generative approaches for different query types in first-stage retrieval. In re-ranking, we investigate operating points of adaptive re-ranking with different first stages to find the point in graph traversal where the first stage no longer has an effect on the performance of the overall retrieval pipeline. We find some performance gains from the application of generative query reformulation. However, our strongest run in terms of P@10 and nDCG@10 applied both adaptive re-ranking and generative pseudo-relevance feedback, namely uogtr_b_grf_e_gb.

Read more

5/3/2024

Learning Effective Representations for Retrieval Using Self-Distillation with Adaptive Relevance Margins
Total Score

0

Learning Effective Representations for Retrieval Using Self-Distillation with Adaptive Relevance Margins

Lukas Gienapp, Niklas Deckers, Martin Potthast, Harrisen Scells

Representation-based retrieval models, so-called biencoders, estimate the relevance of a document to a query by calculating the similarity of their respective embeddings. Current state-of-the-art biencoders are trained using an expensive training regime involving knowledge distillation from a teacher model and batch-sampling. Instead of relying on a teacher model, we contribute a novel parameter-free loss function for self-supervision that exploits the pre-trained language modeling capabilities of the encoder model as a training signal, eliminating the need for batch sampling by performing implicit hard negative mining. We investigate the capabilities of our proposed approach through extensive ablation studies, demonstrating that self-distillation can match the effectiveness of teacher distillation using only 13.5% of the data, while offering a speedup in training time between 3x and 15x compared to parametrized losses. Code and data is made openly available.

Read more

8/1/2024