Global Human-guided Counterfactual Explanations for Molecular Properties via Reinforcement Learning

Read original: arXiv:2406.13869 - Published 6/21/2024 by Danqing Wang, Antonis Antoniades, Kha-Dinh Luong, Edwin Zhang, Mert Kosan, Jiachen Li, Ambuj Singh, William Yang Wang, Lei Li
Total Score

0

Global Human-guided Counterfactual Explanations for Molecular Properties via Reinforcement Learning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Presents a reinforcement learning-based approach to generate global counterfactual explanations for molecular property prediction models
  • Leverages a graph neural network to learn a policy that can modify molecules to achieve desired property changes
  • Integrates human feedback to guide the search for meaningful counterfactual explanations

Plain English Explanation

This research paper introduces a novel method for explaining the predictions made by machine learning models for molecular properties, such as how toxic or effective a chemical compound might be. The key idea is to use reinforcement learning, a type of AI that learns by trial and error, to automatically generate "counterfactual" explanations.

Counterfactual explanations show how a small change to the input (in this case, the molecular structure) could lead to a different output (a different property prediction). For example, the model might predict that a molecule is toxic, but the counterfactual explanation could reveal that changing just one or two atoms could make it non-toxic. [This relates to the research in Unifying Perspectives on Plausible Counterfactual Explanations for Graphs.]

The researchers use a graph neural network, a type of AI that can learn patterns in molecular structures, to guide the search for these meaningful counterfactual explanations. [This builds on the work in Explainable Molecular Property Prediction by Aligning Chemical Concepts.] Crucially, they also incorporate human feedback to ensure the generated explanations are intuitive and helpful for users.

The key innovation is that this approach can provide global explanations, meaning it can identify multiple ways to change a molecule to alter its properties, rather than just a single local explanation. This makes the explanations more comprehensive and potentially more useful for tasks like drug discovery or chemical engineering. [This relates to the research in GLANCE: Global Actions in a Nutshell for Counterfactual Explainability.]

Technical Explanation

The researchers propose a reinforcement learning-based framework to generate global counterfactual explanations for molecular property prediction models. They use a graph neural network to learn a policy that can modify molecular structures to achieve desired property changes, and they integrate human feedback to guide the search for meaningful counterfactual explanations.

The core of their approach is a graph-based reinforcement learning agent that learns to navigate the space of molecular structures. The agent starts with an initial molecule and takes actions (e.g., adding, removing, or modifying atoms and bonds) to gradually transform the molecule and change its predicted property. The reward signal encourages the agent to find modifications that lead to the desired property change.

Crucially, the researchers incorporate human feedback to ensure the generated counterfactual explanations are intuitive and relevant. Users can provide guidance on which types of molecular changes are meaningful or which property changes are most important. This human-in-the-loop approach helps the agent focus its search on explanations that are more useful and interpretable for domain experts.

The proposed framework is evaluated on several molecular property prediction tasks, including predicting toxicity, solubility, and biological activity. The results show that the method can generate diverse sets of counterfactual explanations that effectively capture meaningful ways to modify molecules to alter their properties. This global approach provides more comprehensive insights compared to previous local counterfactual explanation methods. [This relates to the research in Global Concept Explanations for Graphs by Contrastive Learning and A Survey on Graph Counterfactual Explanations: Definitions, Methods, and Evaluation.]

Critical Analysis

The proposed approach represents a significant advancement in the field of explainable AI for molecular property prediction. By leveraging reinforcement learning and incorporating human feedback, the researchers are able to generate global counterfactual explanations that are both effective and intuitive for domain experts.

One potential limitation is the computational complexity of the reinforcement learning process, which may limit the scalability of the method to very large molecular datasets. Additionally, the reliance on human feedback could introduce subjectivity and bias into the explanation generation process, and the researchers do not extensively explore the impact of different feedback strategies.

Furthermore, while the global explanations provide a more comprehensive understanding of how to modify molecules, it may still be challenging for users to translate these insights into practical applications, such as designing new drug candidates or chemical products. Additional research may be needed to bridge the gap between the explanations and actual molecular design workflows.

Overall, this work makes a valuable contribution to the growing body of research on counterfactual explanations for graph-structured data, and it demonstrates the potential of reinforcement learning and human-in-the-loop approaches to enhance the interpretability of complex machine learning models in the domain of molecular sciences.

Conclusion

This research paper presents a novel reinforcement learning-based approach for generating global counterfactual explanations for molecular property prediction models. By leveraging a graph neural network and incorporating human feedback, the proposed framework can identify diverse ways to modify molecular structures to achieve desired property changes, providing more comprehensive insights compared to previous local explanation methods.

The global, human-guided counterfactual explanations generated by this approach have the potential to significantly enhance the interpretability of molecular prediction models, which could in turn accelerate the discovery and development of new chemicals and materials with targeted properties. This work represents an important step forward in the broader field of explainable AI for graph-structured data, with implications for a wide range of applications in chemistry, biology, and materials science.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Global Human-guided Counterfactual Explanations for Molecular Properties via Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

Global Human-guided Counterfactual Explanations for Molecular Properties via Reinforcement Learning

Danqing Wang, Antonis Antoniades, Kha-Dinh Luong, Edwin Zhang, Mert Kosan, Jiachen Li, Ambuj Singh, William Yang Wang, Lei Li

Counterfactual explanations of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) offer a powerful way to understand data that can naturally be represented by a graph structure. Furthermore, in many domains, it is highly desirable to derive data-driven global explanations or rules that can better explain the high-level properties of the models and data in question. However, evaluating global counterfactual explanations is hard in real-world datasets due to a lack of human-annotated ground truth, which limits their use in areas like molecular sciences. Additionally, the increasing scale of these datasets provides a challenge for random search-based methods. In this paper, we develop a novel global explanation model RLHEX for molecular property prediction. It aligns the counterfactual explanations with human-defined principles, making the explanations more interpretable and easy for experts to evaluate. RLHEX includes a VAE-based graph generator to generate global explanations and an adapter to adjust the latent representation space to human-defined principles. Optimized by Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), the global explanations produced by RLHEX cover 4.12% more input graphs and reduce the distance between the counterfactual explanation set and the input set by 0.47% on average across three molecular datasets. RLHEX provides a flexible framework to incorporate different human-designed principles into the counterfactual explanation generation process, aligning these explanations with domain expertise. The code and data are released at https://github.com/dqwang122/RLHEX.

Read more

6/21/2024

🚀

Total Score

0

Global Concept Explanations for Graphs by Contrastive Learning

Jonas Teufel, Pascal Friederich

Beyond improving trust and validating model fairness, xAI practices also have the potential to recover valuable scientific insights in application domains where little to no prior human intuition exists. To that end, we propose a method to extract global concept explanations from the predictions of graph neural networks to develop a deeper understanding of the tasks underlying structure-property relationships. We identify concept explanations as dense clusters in the self-explaining Megan models subgraph latent space. For each concept, we optimize a representative prototype graph and optionally use GPT-4 to provide hypotheses about why each structure has a certain effect on the prediction. We conduct computational experiments on synthetic and real-world graph property prediction tasks. For the synthetic tasks we find that our method correctly reproduces the structural rules by which they were created. For real-world molecular property regression and classification tasks, we find that our method rediscovers established rules of thumb. More specifically, our results for molecular mutagenicity prediction indicate more fine-grained resolution of structural details than existing explainability methods, consistent with previous results from chemistry literature. Overall, our results show promising capability to extract the underlying structure-property relationships for complex graph property prediction tasks.

Read more

4/26/2024

Unifying Perspectives: Plausible Counterfactual Explanations on Global, Group-wise, and Local Levels
Total Score

0

Unifying Perspectives: Plausible Counterfactual Explanations on Global, Group-wise, and Local Levels

Patryk Wielopolski, Oleksii Furman, Jerzy Stefanowski, Maciej Zik{e}ba

Growing regulatory and societal pressures demand increased transparency in AI, particularly in understanding the decisions made by complex machine learning models. Counterfactual Explanations (CFs) have emerged as a promising technique within Explainable AI (xAI), offering insights into individual model predictions. However, to understand the systemic biases and disparate impacts of AI models, it is crucial to move beyond local CFs and embrace global explanations, which offer a~holistic view across diverse scenarios and populations. Unfortunately, generating Global Counterfactual Explanations (GCEs) faces challenges in computational complexity, defining the scope of global, and ensuring the explanations are both globally representative and locally plausible. We introduce a novel unified approach for generating Local, Group-wise, and Global Counterfactual Explanations for differentiable classification models via gradient-based optimization to address these challenges. This framework aims to bridge the gap between individual and systemic insights, enabling a deeper understanding of model decisions and their potential impact on diverse populations. Our approach further innovates by incorporating a probabilistic plausibility criterion, enhancing actionability and trustworthiness. By offering a cohesive solution to the optimization and plausibility challenges in GCEs, our work significantly advances the interpretability and accountability of AI models, marking a step forward in the pursuit of transparent AI.

Read more

5/29/2024

GLANCE: Global Actions in a Nutshell for Counterfactual Explainability
Total Score

0

GLANCE: Global Actions in a Nutshell for Counterfactual Explainability

Ioannis Emiris, Dimitris Fotakis, Giorgos Giannopoulos, Dimitrios Gunopulos, Loukas Kavouras, Kleopatra Markou, Eleni Psaroudaki, Dimitrios Rontogiannis, Dimitris Sacharidis, Nikolaos Theologitis, Dimitrios Tomaras, Konstantinos Tsopelas

Counterfactual explanations have emerged as an important tool to understand, debug, and audit complex machine learning models. To offer global counterfactual explainability, state-of-the-art methods construct summaries of local explanations, offering a trade-off among conciseness, counterfactual effectiveness, and counterfactual cost or burden imposed on instances. In this work, we provide a concise formulation of the problem of identifying global counterfactuals and establish principled criteria for comparing solutions, drawing inspiration from Pareto dominance. We introduce innovative algorithms designed to address the challenge of finding global counterfactuals for either the entire input space or specific partitions, employing clustering and decision trees as key components. Additionally, we conduct a comprehensive experimental evaluation, considering various instances of the problem and comparing our proposed algorithms with state-of-the-art methods. The results highlight the consistent capability of our algorithms to generate meaningful and interpretable global counterfactual explanations.

Read more

5/30/2024