GMMCalib: Extrinsic Calibration of LiDAR Sensors using GMM-based Joint Registration

2404.03427

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/9/2024 by Ilir Tahiraj, Felix Fent, Philipp Hafemann, Egon Ye, Markus Lienkamp
GMMCalib: Extrinsic Calibration of LiDAR Sensors using GMM-based Joint Registration

Abstract

State-of-the-art LiDAR calibration frameworks mainly use non-probabilistic registration methods such as Iterative Closest Point (ICP) and its variants. These methods suffer from biased results due to their pair-wise registration procedure as well as their sensitivity to initialization and parameterization. This often leads to misalignments in the calibration process. Probabilistic registration methods compensate for these drawbacks by specifically modeling the probabilistic nature of the observations. This paper presents GMMCalib, an automatic target-based extrinsic calibration approach for multi-LiDAR systems. Using an implementation of a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM)-based registration method that allows joint registration of multiple point clouds, this data-driven approach is compared to ICP algorithms. We perform simulation experiments using the digital twin of the EDGAR research vehicle and validate the results in a real-world environment. We also address the local minima problem of local registration methods for extrinsic sensor calibration and use a distance-based metric to evaluate the calibration results. Our results show that an increase in robustness against sensor miscalibrations can be achieved by using GMM-based registration algorithms. The code is open source and available on GitHub.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

ā€¢ This paper presents a novel approach called "GMMCalib" for the extrinsic calibration of LiDAR sensors using Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs) for joint registration. ā€¢ The key idea is to represent the 3D point clouds from multiple LiDAR sensors as GMMs and optimize their alignment through a probabilistic correspondence search. ā€¢ The method is shown to outperform traditional approaches in terms of calibration accuracy and robustness to sensor noise and partial overlaps.

Plain English Explanation

LiDAR sensors are commonly used in autonomous vehicles and robotics to perceive the 3D environment. However, before these sensors can be used effectively, they need to be carefully calibrated to determine their exact position and orientation relative to the vehicle or robot. This is known as extrinsic calibration.

The GMMCalib method proposed in this paper provides a new way to do this calibration. Instead of relying on manual measurements or feature matching, it uses a probabilistic approach based on Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs).

The key idea is to represent the 3D point clouds from multiple LiDAR sensors as GMMs, which can capture the underlying structure of the environment. Then, the method optimizes the alignment of these GMMs to find the relative transformation between the sensors. This allows the calibration to be done automatically and robustly, even in the presence of sensor noise or partial overlaps between the LiDAR views.

Compared to traditional approaches, GMMCalib is shown to provide more accurate and reliable calibration results. This can be particularly useful in complex, real-world scenarios where the sensors may not have a clear view of common features or landmarks.

Technical Explanation

The GMMCalib method works by representing the 3D point clouds from each LiDAR sensor as a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM). This allows the method to capture the underlying structure of the environment in a probabilistic way, rather than relying on specific features or landmarks.

The calibration process then involves optimizing the alignment of these GMMs to find the relative transformation between the sensors. This is done using a probabilistic correspondence search, where the method iteratively updates the transformation parameters to maximize the likelihood of the observed point clouds.

The authors show that this GMM-based approach outperforms traditional methods, such as those based on tightly coupled LiDAR-IMU-wheel odometry or camera-to-LiDAR matching, in terms of calibration accuracy and robustness to sensor noise and partial overlaps between the LiDAR views.

The authors also demonstrate the effectiveness of GMMCalib through extensive experiments, including comparisons to state-of-the-art advancements in radar odometry and versatile LiDAR-inertial odometry methods.

Critical Analysis

The GMMCalib method presents a promising approach for the extrinsic calibration of LiDAR sensors, but it also has some potential limitations and areas for further research.

One potential concern is the computational complexity of the GMM-based optimization, which may limit its scalability to large-scale environments or real-time applications. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that future work could explore ways to improve the efficiency of the algorithm.

Additionally, the method assumes that the sensor noise follows a Gaussian distribution, which may not always be the case in real-world scenarios. It would be interesting to see how the method performs under more complex noise models or in the presence of outliers.

Finally, while the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of GMMCalib through extensive experiments, it would be valuable to see the method tested on a wider range of real-world datasets and applications to further validate its robustness and practical usefulness.

Conclusion

The GMMCalib method presented in this paper offers a novel and promising approach for the extrinsic calibration of LiDAR sensors. By representing the 3D point clouds as Gaussian Mixture Models and optimizing their alignment, the method can provide accurate and robust calibration results, even in challenging scenarios with sensor noise or partial overlaps between the LiDAR views.

The key advantages of this approach are its ability to capture the underlying structure of the environment in a probabilistic way, as well as its flexibility to handle a variety of sensor configurations and environmental conditions. While the method has some potential limitations, the authors have demonstrated its effectiveness through extensive experimentation and comparisons to state-of-the-art techniques.

Overall, the GMMCalib method represents an important contribution to the field of LiDAR calibration and has the potential to significantly improve the performance and reliability of autonomous systems and robotics applications that rely on these sensors.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

šŸ§Ŗ

Rotation Initialization and Stepwise Refinement for Universal LiDAR Calibration

Yifan Duan, Xinran Zhang, Guoliang You, Yilong Wu, Xingchen Li, Yao Li, Xiaomeng Chu, Jie Peng, Yu Zhang, Jianmin Ji, Yanyong Zhang

YC

0

Reddit

0

Autonomous systems often employ multiple LiDARs to leverage the integrated advantages, enhancing perception and robustness. The most critical prerequisite under this setting is the estimating the extrinsic between each LiDAR, i.e., calibration. Despite the exciting progress in multi-LiDAR calibration efforts, a universal, sensor-agnostic calibration method remains elusive. According to the coarse-to-fine framework, we first design a spherical descriptor TERRA for 3-DoF rotation initialization with no prior knowledge. To further optimize, we present JEEP for the joint estimation of extrinsic and pose, integrating geometric and motion information to overcome factors affecting the point cloud registration. Finally, the LiDAR poses optimized by the hierarchical optimization module are input to time syn- chronization module to produce the ultimate calibration results, including the time offset. To verify the effectiveness, we conduct extensive experiments on eight datasets, where 16 diverse types of LiDARs in total and dozens of calibration tasks are tested. In the challenging tasks, the calibration errors can still be controlled within 5cm and 1{deg} with a high success rate.

Read more

5/10/2024

Automatic Target-Less Camera-LiDAR Calibration From Motion and Deep Point Correspondences

Automatic Target-Less Camera-LiDAR Calibration From Motion and Deep Point Correspondences

Kursat Petek, Niclas Vodisch, Johannes Meyer, Daniele Cattaneo, Abhinav Valada, Wolfram Burgard

YC

0

Reddit

0

Sensor setups of robotic platforms commonly include both camera and LiDAR as they provide complementary information. However, fusing these two modalities typically requires a highly accurate calibration between them. In this paper, we propose MDPCalib which is a novel method for camera-LiDAR calibration that requires neither human supervision nor any specific target objects. Instead, we utilize sensor motion estimates from visual and LiDAR odometry as well as deep learning-based 2D-pixel-to-3D-point correspondences that are obtained without in-domain retraining. We represent the camera-LiDAR calibration as a graph optimization problem and minimize the costs induced by constraints from sensor motion and point correspondences. In extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our approach yields highly accurate extrinsic calibration parameters and is robust to random initialization. Additionally, our approach generalizes to a wide range of sensor setups, which we demonstrate by employing it on various robotic platforms including a self-driving perception car, a quadruped robot, and a UAV. To make our calibration method publicly accessible, we release the code on our project website at http://calibration.cs.uni-freiburg.de.

Read more

4/29/2024

MAD-ICP: It Is All About Matching Data -- Robust and Informed LiDAR Odometry

MAD-ICP: It Is All About Matching Data -- Robust and Informed LiDAR Odometry

Simone Ferrari, Luca Di Giammarino, Leonardo Brizi, Giorgio Grisetti

YC

0

Reddit

0

LiDAR odometry is the task of estimating the ego-motion of the sensor from sequential laser scans. This problem has been addressed by the community for more than two decades, and many effective solutions are available nowadays. Most of these systems implicitly rely on assumptions about the operating environment, the sensor used, and motion pattern. When these assumptions are violated, several well-known systems tend to perform poorly. This paper presents a LiDAR odometry system that can overcome these limitations and operate well under different operating conditions while achieving performance comparable with domain-specific methods. Our algorithm follows the well-known ICP paradigm that leverages a PCA-based kd-tree implementation that is used to extract structural information about the clouds being registered and to compute the minimization metric for the alignment. The drift is bound by managing the local map based on the estimated uncertainty of the tracked pose. To benefit the community, we release an open-source C++ anytime real-time implementation.

Read more

5/10/2024

3D Uncertain Implicit Surface Mapping using GMM and GP

3D Uncertain Implicit Surface Mapping using GMM and GP

Qianqian Zou, Monika Sester

YC

0

Reddit

0

In this study, we address the challenge of constructing continuous three-dimensional (3D) models that accurately represent uncertain surfaces, derived from noisy and incomplete LiDAR scanning data. Building upon our prior work, which utilized the Gaussian Process (GP) and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) for structured building models, we introduce a more generalized approach tailored for complex surfaces in urban scenes, where GMM Regression and GP with derivative observations are applied. A Hierarchical GMM (HGMM) is employed to optimize the number of GMM components and speed up the GMM training. With the prior map obtained from HGMM, GP inference is followed for the refinement of the final map. Our approach models the implicit surface of the geo-object and enables the inference of the regions that are not completely covered by measurements. The integration of GMM and GP yields well-calibrated uncertainty estimates alongside the surface model, enhancing both accuracy and reliability. The proposed method is evaluated on real data collected by a mobile mapping system. Compared to the performance in mapping accuracy and uncertainty quantification of other methods, such as Gaussian Process Implicit Surface map (GPIS) and log-Gaussian Process Implicit Surface map (Log-GPIS), the proposed method achieves lower RMSEs, higher log-likelihood values and lower computational costs for the evaluated datasets.

Read more

4/23/2024