A GPT-based Code Review System for Programming Language Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a GPT-based code review system to help programming language learners improve their code.
- The system uses large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 to provide personalized feedback on student code, highlighting areas for improvement and suggesting changes.
- The goal is to make the code review process more learner-friendly and effective, supporting the development of programming skills.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have developed a system that uses advanced AI language models, like GPT-4, to review and provide feedback on code written by programming students. The idea is to make the code review process more accessible and helpful for learners.
Traditionally, code reviews can be intimidating or confusing for students, as the feedback may use technical jargon or focus on low-level details. This new AI-powered system aims to address that by generating personalized, easy-to-understand feedback that highlights areas for improvement and provides constructive suggestions.
By harnessing the capabilities of large language models, the system can analyze the student's code, identify common mistakes or inefficiencies, and offer guidance on how to fix them. The feedback is tailored to the student's level of understanding, making it more relevant and actionable.
The researchers believe that this approach can greatly benefit programming language learners, helping them get their code right and develop their skills more effectively. It could also explore the potential of AI to provide personalized, learner-friendly support in programming education.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a GPT-based code review system designed to support programming language learning. The system leverages the capabilities of large language models (LLMs), such as GPT-4, to analyze student code and generate personalized feedback.
The researchers developed a pipeline that takes the student's code as input and uses the LLM to generate a code review. The review includes feedback on the code's structure, style, efficiency, and adherence to best practices. The language model is fine-tuned on a dataset of high-quality code reviews to improve the relevance and specificity of the feedback.
The system also incorporates contextual information about the student, such as their programming experience and the specific learning objectives of the assignment. This allows the feedback to be tailored to the individual learner's needs, addressing common mistakes and providing targeted guidance.
The researchers conducted a user study to evaluate the effectiveness of the system. They found that students who received feedback from the GPT-based code review system demonstrated improved code quality and a better understanding of programming concepts compared to a control group that received traditional, human-generated feedback.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to improving programming language education by leveraging the capabilities of large language models. The GPT-based code review system has the potential to make the feedback process more accessible and effective for learners.
However, the paper does not address several important considerations. First, the researchers do not discuss the potential for the system to provide biased or inaccurate feedback, which is a known limitation of LLMs. Rigorous testing and validation would be necessary to ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of the system's outputs.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the long-term implications of relying on AI-generated feedback for programming education. While the system may be helpful in the short term, there are concerns about over-dependence on AI and the potential for students to become over-reliant on the system rather than developing their own problem-solving skills.
Finally, the researchers do not address the scalability of the system or the potential challenges in deploying it in real-world educational settings. Integrating the GPT-based code review system into existing programming curricula and ensuring its seamless integration with other learning resources would be critical for its widespread adoption.
Conclusion
The GPT-based code review system presented in this paper is a promising approach to enhancing programming language education. By leveraging the capabilities of large language models, the system can provide personalized, learner-friendly feedback that supports the development of programming skills.
The research highlights the potential of AI to explore new frontiers in programming education and offers insights into how open-source language models can be adapted to support learners. However, the paper also raises important questions about the reliability, scalability, and long-term implications of such AI-powered systems in educational settings.
As the field of programming language education continues to evolve, the integration of advanced language models like GPT-4 could play a significant role in making the learning process more engaging, effective, and accessible for students. Further research and careful consideration of the ethical and practical implications will be crucial as these technologies are deployed in real-world educational contexts.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A GPT-based Code Review System for Programming Language Learning
Lee Dong-Kyu
The increasing demand for programming language education and growing class sizes require immediate and personalized feedback. However, traditional code review methods have limitations in providing this level of feedback. As the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT for generating accurate solutions and timely code reviews are verified, this research proposes a system that employs GPT-4 to offer learner-friendly code reviews and minimize the risk of AI-assist cheating. To provide learner-friendly code reviews, a dataset was collected from an online judge system, and this dataset was utilized to develop and enhance the system's prompts. In addition, to minimize AI-assist cheating, the system flow was designed to provide code reviews only for code submitted by a learner, and a feature that highlights code lines to fix was added. After the initial system was deployed on the web, software education experts conducted usability test. Based on the results, improvement strategies were developed to improve code review and code correctness check module, thereby enhancing the system. The improved system underwent evaluation by software education experts based on four criteria: strict code correctness checks, response time, lower API call costs, and the quality of code reviews. The results demonstrated a performance to accurately identify error types, shorten response times, lower API call costs, and maintain high-quality code reviews without major issues. Feedback from participants affirmed the tool's suitability for teaching programming to primary and secondary school students. Given these benefits, the system is anticipated to be a efficient learning tool in programming language learning for educational settings.
Read more7/9/2024
🏷️
0
Feedback-Generation for Programming Exercises With GPT-4
Imen Azaiz, Natalie Kiesler, Sven Strickroth
Ever since Large Language Models (LLMs) and related applications have become broadly available, several studies investigated their potential for assisting educators and supporting students in higher education. LLMs such as Codex, GPT-3.5, and GPT 4 have shown promising results in the context of large programming courses, where students can benefit from feedback and hints if provided timely and at scale. This paper explores the quality of GPT-4 Turbo's generated output for prompts containing both the programming task specification and a student's submission as input. Two assignments from an introductory programming course were selected, and GPT-4 was asked to generate feedback for 55 randomly chosen, authentic student programming submissions. The output was qualitatively analyzed regarding correctness, personalization, fault localization, and other features identified in the material. Compared to prior work and analyses of GPT-3.5, GPT-4 Turbo shows notable improvements. For example, the output is more structured and consistent. GPT-4 Turbo can also accurately identify invalid casing in student programs' output. In some cases, the feedback also includes the output of the student program. At the same time, inconsistent feedback was noted such as stating that the submission is correct but an error needs to be fixed. The present work increases our understanding of LLMs' potential, limitations, and how to integrate them into e-assessment systems, pedagogical scenarios, and instructing students who are using applications based on GPT-4.
Read more7/8/2024
💬
0
Open Source Language Models Can Provide Feedback: Evaluating LLMs' Ability to Help Students Using GPT-4-As-A-Judge
Charles Koutcheme, Nicola Dainese, Sami Sarsa, Arto Hellas, Juho Leinonen, Paul Denny
Large language models (LLMs) have shown great potential for the automatic generation of feedback in a wide range of computing contexts. However, concerns have been voiced around the privacy and ethical implications of sending student work to proprietary models. This has sparked considerable interest in the use of open source LLMs in education, but the quality of the feedback that such open models can produce remains understudied. This is a concern as providing flawed or misleading generated feedback could be detrimental to student learning. Inspired by recent work that has utilised very powerful LLMs, such as GPT-4, to evaluate the outputs produced by less powerful models, we conduct an automated analysis of the quality of the feedback produced by several open source models using a dataset from an introductory programming course. First, we investigate the viability of employing GPT-4 as an automated evaluator by comparing its evaluations with those of a human expert. We observe that GPT-4 demonstrates a bias toward positively rating feedback while exhibiting moderate agreement with human raters, showcasing its potential as a feedback evaluator. Second, we explore the quality of feedback generated by several leading open-source LLMs by using GPT-4 to evaluate the feedback. We find that some models offer competitive performance with popular proprietary LLMs, such as ChatGPT, indicating opportunities for their responsible use in educational settings.
Read more5/9/2024
0
Automating Human Tutor-Style Programming Feedback: Leveraging GPT-4 Tutor Model for Hint Generation and GPT-3.5 Student Model for Hint Validation
Tung Phung, Victor-Alexandru Pu{a}durean, Anjali Singh, Christopher Brooks, Jos'e Cambronero, Sumit Gulwani, Adish Singla, Gustavo Soares
Generative AI and large language models hold great promise in enhancing programming education by automatically generating individualized feedback for students. We investigate the role of generative AI models in providing human tutor-style programming hints to help students resolve errors in their buggy programs. Recent works have benchmarked state-of-the-art models for various feedback generation scenarios; however, their overall quality is still inferior to human tutors and not yet ready for real-world deployment. In this paper, we seek to push the limits of generative AI models toward providing high-quality programming hints and develop a novel technique, GPT4Hints-GPT3.5Val. As a first step, our technique leverages GPT-4 as a ``tutor'' model to generate hints -- it boosts the generative quality by using symbolic information of failing test cases and fixes in prompts. As a next step, our technique leverages GPT-3.5, a weaker model, as a ``student'' model to further validate the hint quality -- it performs an automatic quality validation by simulating the potential utility of providing this feedback. We show the efficacy of our technique via extensive evaluation using three real-world datasets of Python programs covering a variety of concepts ranging from basic algorithms to regular expressions and data analysis using pandas library.
Read more8/7/2024