Graph Expansions of Deep Neural Networks and their Universal Scaling Limits

Read original: arXiv:2407.08459 - Published 9/17/2024 by Nicola Muca Cirone, Jad Hamdan, Cristopher Salvi
Total Score

0

🤿

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a unified approach to obtain scaling limits of neural networks using the genus expansion technique from random matrix theory.
  • The approach involves a novel expansion of neural networks that linearizes the effect of activation functions, allowing for the direct application of Wick's principle to compute the expectation of each term.
  • The authors determine the leading contribution to each term by embedding the corresponding graphs onto surfaces and computing their Euler characteristic.
  • The paper also develops a correspondence between analytic and graphical operations, allowing for similar graph expansions of the neural tangent kernel and input-output Jacobian, and their infinite-width limits.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers in this paper have found a new way to understand how the structure and size of neural networks affect their performance. They use a technique from a field called random matrix theory to break down the inner workings of neural networks into simpler mathematical pieces.

This approach starts with a new way of looking at neural networks, which is reminiscent of a technique used to study ordinary differential equations. This allows the researchers to simplify the complex math involved in neural networks and focus on the key factors that influence their behavior.

The researchers then use this new representation to analyze how the neural network's "input-output Jacobian" and "neural tangent kernel" change as the network gets larger. The Jacobian and tangent kernel are important quantities that describe how the network's outputs respond to changes in its inputs. By studying how these quantities change, the researchers can better understand how neural networks behave in the limit as they become infinitely large.

Interestingly, the researchers find that the behavior of the Jacobian and tangent kernel is closely tied to the "graph structure" of the neural network, which reflects how the network's neurons are connected. This suggests that the network's activation function, which determines how the neurons interact, plays a key role in determining the network's overall behavior.

Overall, this work provides a new mathematical framework for understanding the scaling behavior of neural networks as they get larger, which could have important implications for the design and optimization of deep learning models.

Technical Explanation

The core of the paper's approach is a novel expansion of neural networks that is reminiscent of the Butcher series for ordinary differential equations. This expansion represents the network in terms of random multilinear maps indexed by directed graphs, where the edges correspond to random matrices. The authors call these structures "operator graphs".

This expansion has the key advantage of linearizing the effect of the activation functions, which allows the researchers to directly apply Wick's principle to compute the expectation of each term in the expansion. To determine the leading contribution of each term, the authors embed the corresponding graphs onto surfaces and compute their Euler characteristic.

The researchers then develop a correspondence between analytic and graphical operations, enabling them to obtain similar graph expansions for the neural tangent kernel and input-output Jacobian of the original neural network. This allows them to derive the infinite-width limits of these quantities with relative ease.

Notably, the authors find explicit formulae for the moments of the limiting singular value distribution of the Jacobian. They also show that their results hold for networks with more general weight structures, such as general matrices with i.i.d. entries satisfying moment assumptions, complex matrices, and sparse matrices.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a comprehensive and rigorous mathematical framework for analyzing the scaling behavior of neural networks. The use of random matrix theory techniques, such as the genus expansion and Wick's principle, provides a principled way to study the infinite-width limits of key network quantities.

One potential limitation is the reliance on specific assumptions about the weight distributions and activation functions. While the authors show their results hold for a broader class of weight structures, it would be interesting to see how the framework could be extended to even more general settings.

Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on theoretical analysis, and does not provide extensive empirical validation of the derived scaling laws. It would be valuable to see how well the theoretical predictions match observed behavior in practical neural network architectures and training regimes.

Finally, the authors note that their approach does not directly address the role of depth in neural network scaling. Extending the framework to better understand the interplay between depth and width could lead to further insights into neural network behavior.

Overall, this work represents a significant advance in the mathematical understanding of neural network scaling, and opens up new avenues for research in this important area of deep learning theory.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel and unified approach to obtaining scaling limits of neural networks using techniques from random matrix theory. The key contributions are:

  1. A new expansion of neural networks that linearizes the effect of activation functions, enabling the direct application of Wick's principle.
  2. A correspondence between analytic and graphical operations, allowing for similar graph expansions and infinite-width limits of the neural tangent kernel and input-output Jacobian.
  3. Explicit formulae for the moments of the limiting singular value distribution of the Jacobian.
  4. Extensions of the results to networks with more general weight structures, including complex and sparse matrices.

These advances provide a principled mathematical framework for understanding the scaling behavior of neural networks as they grow larger. This could have important implications for the design and optimization of deep learning models, as well as our fundamental understanding of how neural networks function.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤿

Total Score

0

Graph Expansions of Deep Neural Networks and their Universal Scaling Limits

Nicola Muca Cirone, Jad Hamdan, Cristopher Salvi

We present a unified approach to obtain scaling limits of neural networks using the genus expansion technique from random matrix theory. This approach begins with a novel expansion of neural networks which is reminiscent of Butcher series for ODEs, and is obtained through a generalisation of Fa`a di Bruno's formula to an arbitrary number of compositions. In this expansion, the role of monomials is played by random multilinear maps indexed by directed graphs whose edges correspond to random matrices, which we call operator graphs. This expansion linearises the effect of the activation functions, allowing for the direct application of Wick's principle to compute the expectation of each of its terms. We then determine the leading contribution to each term by embedding the corresponding graphs onto surfaces, and computing their Euler characteristic. Furthermore, by developing a correspondence between analytic and graphical operations, we obtain similar graph expansions for the neural tangent kernel as well as the input-output Jacobian of the original neural network, and derive their infinite-width limits with relative ease. Notably, we find explicit formulae for the moments of the limiting singular value distribution of the Jacobian. We then show that all of these results hold for networks with more general weights, such as general matrices with i.i.d. entries satisfying moment assumptions, complex matrices and sparse matrices.

Read more

9/17/2024

🏋️

Total Score

0

An Infinite-Width Analysis on the Jacobian-Regularised Training of a Neural Network

Taeyoung Kim, Hongseok Yang

The recent theoretical analysis of deep neural networks in their infinite-width limits has deepened our understanding of initialisation, feature learning, and training of those networks, and brought new practical techniques for finding appropriate hyperparameters, learning network weights, and performing inference. In this paper, we broaden this line of research by showing that this infinite-width analysis can be extended to the Jacobian of a deep neural network. We show that a multilayer perceptron (MLP) and its Jacobian at initialisation jointly converge to a Gaussian process (GP) as the widths of the MLP's hidden layers go to infinity and characterise this GP. We also prove that in the infinite-width limit, the evolution of the MLP under the so-called robust training (i.e., training with a regulariser on the Jacobian) is described by a linear first-order ordinary differential equation that is determined by a variant of the Neural Tangent Kernel. We experimentally show the relevance of our theoretical claims to wide finite networks, and empirically analyse the properties of kernel regression solution to obtain an insight into Jacobian regularisation.

Read more

8/23/2024

Neural Scaling Laws on Graphs
Total Score

0

Neural Scaling Laws on Graphs

Jingzhe Liu, Haitao Mao, Zhikai Chen, Tong Zhao, Neil Shah, Jiliang Tang

Deep graph models (e.g., graph neural networks and graph transformers) have become important techniques for leveraging knowledge across various types of graphs. Yet, the scaling properties of deep graph models have not been systematically investigated, casting doubt on the feasibility of achieving large graph models through enlarging the model and dataset sizes. In this work, we delve into neural scaling laws on graphs from both model and data perspectives. We first verify the validity of such laws on graphs, establishing formulations to describe the scaling behaviors. For model scaling, we investigate the phenomenon of scaling law collapse and identify overfitting as the potential reason. Moreover, we reveal that the model depth of deep graph models can impact the model scaling behaviors, which differ from observations in other domains such as CV and NLP. For data scaling, we suggest that the number of graphs can not effectively metric the graph data volume in scaling law since the sizes of different graphs are highly irregular. Instead, we reform the data scaling law with the number of edges as the metric to address the irregular graph sizes. We further demonstrate the reformed law offers a unified view of the data scaling behaviors for various fundamental graph tasks including node classification, link prediction, and graph classification. This work provides valuable insights into neural scaling laws on graphs, which can serve as an essential step toward large graph models.

Read more

6/11/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Quantitative CLTs in Deep Neural Networks

Stefano Favaro, Boris Hanin, Domenico Marinucci, Ivan Nourdin, Giovanni Peccati

We study the distribution of a fully connected neural network with random Gaussian weights and biases in which the hidden layer widths are proportional to a large constant $n$. Under mild assumptions on the non-linearity, we obtain quantitative bounds on normal approximations valid at large but finite $n$ and any fixed network depth. Our theorems show both for the finite-dimensional distributions and the entire process, that the distance between a random fully connected network (and its derivatives) to the corresponding infinite width Gaussian process scales like $n^{-gamma}$ for $gamma>0$, with the exponent depending on the metric used to measure discrepancy. Our bounds are strictly stronger in terms of their dependence on network width than any previously available in the literature; in the one-dimensional case, we also prove that they are optimal, i.e., we establish matching lower bounds.

Read more

6/18/2024