GraphEval2000: Benchmarking and Improving Large Language Models on Graph Datasets
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper introduces a new benchmark, called GraphEval2000, for evaluating and improving the performance of large language models (LLMs) on graph-related tasks.
• The researchers investigate how well current LLMs, such as GPT-3 and PaLM, can handle graph-structured data and reasoning, which is an important capability for many real-world applications.
• The paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of LLM performance across a diverse set of graph tasks, including graph classification, link prediction, and node property prediction.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this study wanted to understand how well the latest and greatest language models, like GPT-3 and PaLM, can work with graph-structured data. Graphs are a way of representing connections between different things, and they're used in all sorts of applications, from social networks to chemical structures.
The researchers created a new benchmark called GraphEval2000 that tests these language models on a variety of graph-related tasks. This includes things like figuring out what category a graph belongs to, predicting which nodes in a graph are connected, and guessing the properties of individual nodes.
By evaluating the language models on this diverse set of graph tasks, the researchers can get a better sense of how capable the models are at understanding and reasoning about graph-structured information. This is an important capability for many real-world applications that involve complex, interconnected data.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new benchmark, called GraphEval2000, for evaluating the performance of large language models (LLMs) on a variety of graph-related tasks. The benchmark includes tasks such as graph classification, link prediction, and node property prediction.
The researchers investigate how well current state-of-the-art LLMs, such as GPT-3 and PaLM, can handle graph-structured data and reasoning. They evaluate the models' performance on the GraphEval2000 benchmark and provide detailed analyses of the results, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of the LLMs on different types of graph-related tasks.
The paper also explores techniques for improving LLM performance on graph-structured data, such as incorporating graph-specific inductive biases and pretraining strategies.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research in their work. For example, the GraphEval2000 benchmark, while comprehensive, may not capture all the nuances and complexities of real-world graph-related tasks. Additionally, the evaluation is limited to a specific set of LLMs, and the performance of other models or future versions of the evaluated models is unknown.
Moreover, the paper does not provide a deep analysis of the underlying reasons for the LLMs' successes and failures on the different graph tasks. Further research could explore the architectural and training characteristics that enable or hinder graph reasoning capabilities in language models.
Conclusion
This paper presents an important step towards understanding and improving the ability of large language models to work with graph-structured data. The GraphEval2000 benchmark provides a valuable tool for evaluating and comparing the graph-related capabilities of different LLMs, which can guide future research and development in this area.
The insights gained from this work could have significant implications for a wide range of applications that rely on graph-based representations, such as social network analysis, molecular design, and knowledge graph reasoning. As LLMs continue to advance, the ability to effectively handle graph-structured data will become increasingly crucial for unlocking their full potential.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
GraphEval2000: Benchmarking and Improving Large Language Models on Graph Datasets
Qiming Wu, Zichen Chen, Will Corcoran, Misha Sra, Ambuj K. Singh
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in natural language processing (NLP), demonstrating significant capabilities in processing and understanding text data. However, recent studies have identified limitations in LLMs' ability to reason about graph-structured data. To address this gap, we introduce GraphEval2000, the first comprehensive graph dataset, comprising 40 graph data structure problems along with 2000 test cases. Additionally, we introduce an evaluation framework based on GraphEval2000, designed to assess the graph reasoning abilities of LLMs through coding challenges. Our dataset categorizes test cases into four primary and four sub-categories, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation. We evaluate eight popular LLMs on GraphEval2000, revealing that LLMs exhibit a better understanding of directed graphs compared to undirected ones. While private LLMs consistently outperform open-source models, the performance gap is narrowing. Furthermore, to improve the usability of our evaluation framework, we propose Structured Symbolic Decomposition (SSD), an instruction-based method designed to enhance LLM performance on GraphEval2000. Results show that SSD improves the performance of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and GPT-4o on complex graph problems, with an increase of 11.11%, 33.37%, and 33.37%, respectively.
Read more6/26/2024
0
GLBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Graph with Large Language Models
Yuhan Li, Peisong Wang, Xiao Zhu, Aochuan Chen, Haiyun Jiang, Deng Cai, Victor Wai Kin Chan, Jia Li
The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has revolutionized the way we interact with graphs, leading to a new paradigm called GraphLLM. Despite the rapid development of GraphLLM methods in recent years, the progress and understanding of this field remain unclear due to the lack of a benchmark with consistent experimental protocols. To bridge this gap, we introduce GLBench, the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating GraphLLM methods in both supervised and zero-shot scenarios. GLBench provides a fair and thorough evaluation of different categories of GraphLLM methods, along with traditional baselines such as graph neural networks. Through extensive experiments on a collection of real-world datasets with consistent data processing and splitting strategies, we have uncovered several key findings. Firstly, GraphLLM methods outperform traditional baselines in supervised settings, with LLM-as-enhancers showing the most robust performance. However, using LLMs as predictors is less effective and often leads to uncontrollable output issues. We also notice that no clear scaling laws exist for current GraphLLM methods. In addition, both structures and semantics are crucial for effective zero-shot transfer, and our proposed simple baseline can even outperform several models tailored for zero-shot scenarios. The data and code of the benchmark can be found at https://github.com/NineAbyss/GLBench.
Read more7/12/2024
0
GraphArena: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Graph Computational Problems
Jianheng Tang, Qifan Zhang, Yuhan Li, Jia Li
The arms race of Large Language Models (LLMs) demands novel, challenging, and diverse benchmarks to faithfully examine their progresses. We introduce GraphArena, a benchmarking tool designed to evaluate LLMs on graph computational problems using million-scale real-world graphs from diverse scenarios such as knowledge graphs, social networks, and molecular structures. GraphArena offers a suite of 10 computational tasks, encompassing four polynomial-time (e.g., Shortest Distance) and six NP-complete challenges (e.g., Travelling Salesman Problem). It features a rigorous evaluation framework that classifies LLM outputs as correct, suboptimal (feasible but not optimal), or hallucinatory (properly formatted but infeasible). Evaluation of 10 leading LLMs, including GPT-4o and LLaMA3-70B-Instruct, reveals that even top-performing models struggle with larger, more complex graph problems and exhibit hallucination issues. Despite the application of strategies such as chain-of-thought prompting, these issues remain unresolved. GraphArena contributes a valuable supplement to the existing LLM benchmarks and is open-sourced at https://github.com/squareRoot3/GraphArena.
Read more7/2/2024
0
GraCoRe: Benchmarking Graph Comprehension and Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models
Zike Yuan, Ming Liu, Hui Wang, Bing Qin
Evaluating the graph comprehension and reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) is challenging and often incomplete. Existing benchmarks focus primarily on pure graph understanding, lacking a comprehensive evaluation across all graph types and detailed capability definitions. This paper presents GraCoRe, a benchmark for systematically assessing LLMs' graph comprehension and reasoning. GraCoRe uses a three-tier hierarchical taxonomy to categorize and test models on pure graph and heterogeneous graphs, subdividing capabilities into 10 distinct areas tested through 19 tasks. Our benchmark includes 11 datasets with 5,140 graphs of varying complexity. We evaluated three closed-source and seven open-source LLMs, conducting thorough analyses from both ability and task perspectives. Key findings reveal that semantic enrichment enhances reasoning performance, node ordering impacts task success, and the ability to process longer texts does not necessarily improve graph comprehension or reasoning. GraCoRe is open-sourced at https://github.com/ZIKEYUAN/GraCoRe
Read more7/4/2024