Grounded Predictions of Teamwork as a One-Shot Game: A Multiagent Multi-Armed Bandits Approach

Read original: arXiv:2409.17214 - Published 9/27/2024 by Alejandra L'opez de Aberasturi G'omez, Carles Sierra, Jordi Sabater-Mir
Total Score

0

Grounded Predictions of Teamwork as a One-Shot Game: A Multiagent Multi-Armed Bandits Approach

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a multiagent multi-armed bandits approach to model teamwork as a one-shot game.
  • The goal is to enable grounded predictions of team performance and individual contributions in collaborative scenarios.
  • The method uses a combinatorial multi-armed bandit formulation to capture the complex interdependencies between agent actions and team outcomes.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new way to model teamwork using a multiagent multi-armed bandits approach. Teamwork is viewed as a one-shot game, where agents make decisions that impact the overall team performance.

The key idea is to use a combinatorial multi-armed bandit formulation to capture the complex relationships between what each agent does and the resulting team outcome. This allows the model to make grounded predictions about how individual contributions affect the team's overall success.

By framing teamwork as a one-shot game, the approach can be used to analyze collaborative scenarios and understand how different agent behaviors impact the team's performance. This could be useful for applications like multi-player games, where predicting team dynamics is important.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a multiagent multi-armed bandits approach to model teamwork as a one-shot game. The key technical contributions are:

  1. Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit Formulation: The team's performance is modeled as a combinatorial multi-armed bandit problem, where each agent's action corresponds to pulling a different "arm" of the bandit. The reward depends on the combination of arms pulled by all agents.

  2. Grounded Predictions: The bandit formulation allows the model to make grounded predictions about how individual agent contributions impact the team's overall performance. This provides insights into the complex interdependencies between agent actions and team outcomes.

  3. One-Shot Game: By framing teamwork as a one-shot game, the approach can be used to analyze collaborative scenarios where agents make decisions without the ability to coordinate or revise their actions over time.

The proposed method could be applied to various domains, such as multi-player games, where understanding team dynamics and individual contributions is crucial for effective collaboration and strategy development.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a novel and interesting approach to modeling teamwork using a multiagent multi-armed bandits framework. However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Theoretical Guarantees: The authors note that the theoretical performance guarantees of their approach are not yet fully characterized, and more work is needed to better understand the algorithm's convergence and regret properties.

  2. Scalability: The complexity of the combinatorial multi-armed bandit problem may limit the scalability of the approach to larger teams or more complex collaborative scenarios. Exploring techniques to improve the computational efficiency would be valuable.

  3. Real-World Applicability: While the paper demonstrates the approach on synthetic scenarios, further research is needed to validate its performance and practical applicability in real-world collaborative settings, such as multi-player games or team-based tasks.

  4. Potential Biases: The way the one-shot game is formulated and the assumptions made about agent behaviors could introduce certain biases or limitations in the model's ability to capture the nuances of human teamwork. Addressing these potential biases would be an important direction for future work.

Overall, the paper presents a promising and innovative approach to modeling teamwork, but additional research is needed to address the identified limitations and further explore the practical applications of the proposed method.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a multiagent multi-armed bandits approach to modeling teamwork as a one-shot game. The key contribution is the use of a combinatorial multi-armed bandit formulation to enable grounded predictions of team performance and individual contributions in collaborative scenarios.

This work has the potential to provide valuable insights into the complex dynamics of teamwork, which could be particularly useful for applications like multi-player games where understanding team interactions is crucial. While the paper identifies several areas for further research, the proposed approach represents an important step forward in the modeling and analysis of collaborative decision-making.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Grounded Predictions of Teamwork as a One-Shot Game: A Multiagent Multi-Armed Bandits Approach
Total Score

0

Grounded Predictions of Teamwork as a One-Shot Game: A Multiagent Multi-Armed Bandits Approach

Alejandra L'opez de Aberasturi G'omez, Carles Sierra, Jordi Sabater-Mir

Humans possess innate collaborative capacities. However, effective teamwork often remains challenging. This study delves into the feasibility of collaboration within teams of rational, self-interested agents who engage in teamwork without the obligation to contribute. Drawing from psychological and game theoretical frameworks, we formalise teamwork as a one-shot aggregative game, integrating insights from Steiner's theory of group productivity. We characterise this novel game's Nash equilibria and propose a multiagent multi-armed bandit system that learns to converge to approximations of such equilibria. Our research contributes value to the areas of game theory and multiagent systems, paving the way for a better understanding of voluntary collaborative dynamics. We examine how team heterogeneity, task typology, and assessment difficulty influence agents' strategies and resulting teamwork outcomes. Finally, we empirically study the behaviour of work teams under incentive systems that defy analytical treatment. Our agents demonstrate human-like behaviour patterns, corroborating findings from social psychology research.

Read more

9/27/2024

🏅

Total Score

0

Collaborative Multi-Agent Heterogeneous Multi-Armed Bandits

Ronshee Chawla, Daniel Vial, Sanjay Shakkottai, R. Srikant

The study of collaborative multi-agent bandits has attracted significant attention recently. In light of this, we initiate the study of a new collaborative setting, consisting of $N$ agents such that each agent is learning one of $M$ stochastic multi-armed bandits to minimize their group cumulative regret. We develop decentralized algorithms which facilitate collaboration between the agents under two scenarios. We characterize the performance of these algorithms by deriving the per agent cumulative regret and group regret upper bounds. We also prove lower bounds for the group regret in this setting, which demonstrates the near-optimal behavior of the proposed algorithms.

Read more

7/4/2024

🤔

Total Score

0

Cooperation Dynamics in Multi-Agent Systems: Exploring Game-Theoretic Scenarios with Mean-Field Equilibria

Vaigarai Sathi, Sabahat Shaik, Jaswanth Nidamanuri

Cooperation is fundamental in Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) and Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), often requiring agents to balance individual gains with collective rewards. In this regard, this paper aims to investigate strategies to invoke cooperation in game-theoretic scenarios, namely the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma, where agents must optimize both individual and group outcomes. Existing cooperative strategies are analyzed for their effectiveness in promoting group-oriented behavior in repeated games. Modifications are proposed where encouraging group rewards will also result in a higher individual gain, addressing real-world dilemmas seen in distributed systems. The study extends to scenarios with exponentially growing agent populations ($N longrightarrow +infty$), where traditional computation and equilibrium determination are challenging. Leveraging mean-field game theory, equilibrium solutions and reward structures are established for infinitely large agent sets in repeated games. Finally, practical insights are offered through simulations using the Multi Agent-Posthumous Credit Assignment trainer, and the paper explores adapting simulation algorithms to create scenarios favoring cooperation for group rewards. These practical implementations bridge theoretical concepts with real-world applications.

Read more

5/6/2024

N-Agent Ad Hoc Teamwork
Total Score

0

N-Agent Ad Hoc Teamwork

Caroline Wang, Arrasy Rahman, Ishan Durugkar, Elad Liebman, Peter Stone

Current approaches to learning cooperative behaviors in multi-agent settings assume relatively restrictive settings. In standard fully cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning, the learning algorithm controls textit{all} agents in the scenario, while in ad hoc teamwork, the learning algorithm usually assumes control over only a $textit{single}$ agent in the scenario. However, many cooperative settings in the real world are much less restrictive. For example, in an autonomous driving scenario, a company might train its cars with the same learning algorithm, yet once on the road, these cars must cooperate with cars from another company. Towards generalizing the class of scenarios that cooperative learning methods can address, we introduce $N$-agent ad hoc teamwork, in which a set of autonomous agents must interact and cooperate with dynamically varying numbers and types of teammates at evaluation time. This paper formalizes the problem, and proposes the $textit{Policy Optimization with Agent Modelling}$ (POAM) algorithm. POAM is a policy gradient, multi-agent reinforcement learning approach to the NAHT problem, that enables adaptation to diverse teammate behaviors by learning representations of teammate behaviors. Empirical evaluation on StarCraft II tasks shows that POAM improves cooperative task returns compared to baseline approaches, and enables out-of-distribution generalization to unseen teammates.

Read more

4/17/2024