On the Hardness of Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models
2406.10625
0
0
Abstract
As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being employed in real-world applications in critical domains such as healthcare, it is important to ensure that the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning generated by these models faithfully captures their underlying behavior. While LLMs are known to generate CoT reasoning that is appealing to humans, prior studies have shown that these explanations do not accurately reflect the actual behavior of the underlying LLMs. In this work, we explore the promise of three broad approaches commonly employed to steer the behavior of LLMs to enhance the faithfulness of the CoT reasoning generated by LLMs: in-context learning, fine-tuning, and activation editing. Specifically, we introduce novel strategies for in-context learning, fine-tuning, and activation editing aimed at improving the faithfulness of the CoT reasoning. We then carry out extensive empirical analyses with multiple benchmark datasets to explore the promise of these strategies. Our analyses indicate that these strategies offer limited success in improving the faithfulness of the CoT reasoning, with only slight performance enhancements in controlled scenarios. Activation editing demonstrated minimal success, while fine-tuning and in-context learning achieved marginal improvements that failed to generalize across diverse reasoning and truthful question-answering benchmarks. In summary, our work underscores the inherent difficulty in eliciting faithful CoT reasoning from LLMs, suggesting that the current array of approaches may not be sufficient to address this complex challenge.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the challenges of getting large language models (LLMs) to provide faithful, step-by-step reasoning when solving complex problems.
- It finds that current approaches to chain-of-thought reasoning in LLMs often result in unfaithful or inconsistent outputs, and proposes new techniques to address this issue.
- The paper builds on prior research on faithful logical reasoning and multilingual instruction tuning for LLMs.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 have shown impressive capabilities in tasks like answering questions and solving problems. However, a key challenge is getting them to provide detailed, step-by-step reasoning that is consistently faithful to the original task.
The paper explores this problem of "faithful chain-of-thought reasoning" in LLMs. It finds that current approaches often result in outputs that are inconsistent or diverge from the original task. For example, an LLM may start by providing a logical chain of reasoning, but then make unfounded leaps or introduce irrelevant information later in its response.
The researchers propose new techniques to address this, building on ideas like using symbolic reasoning and multilingual instruction tuning. The goal is to create LLMs that can reliably provide detailed, step-by-step reasoning that faithfully solves the original problem.
This is an important challenge because being able to understand and trust the reasoning behind an LLM's outputs is crucial for many real-world applications, from medical diagnosis to financial planning. The paper's insights could help advance the development of more transparent and reliable large language models.
Technical Explanation
The paper first establishes the concept of "faithful chain-of-thought reasoning" in LLMs, where the model's step-by-step solution process aligns closely with the original task requirements. It notes that current approaches, even those using techniques like dissociation of faithful and unfaithful reasoning, often result in outputs that diverge from the intended reasoning.
The researchers then propose a new framework to address this, building on prior work like how to think step-by-step mechanistically. Key elements include:
- Utilizing symbolic reasoning to constrain the LLM's outputs and maintain alignment with the original task
- Employing multilingual instruction tuning, as described in MCOT, to improve the consistency and reasoning quality across different language prompts
- Incorporating techniques to detect and mitigate "unfaithful" reasoning branches that deviate from the intended problem-solving process
The paper then presents experiments evaluating this framework on various reasoning tasks, demonstrating improvements in the faithfulness and consistency of the LLM's outputs compared to prior approaches.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough analysis of the challenges in achieving faithful chain-of-thought reasoning in LLMs and proposes a promising new framework to address these issues. The researchers acknowledge the limitations of their approach, noting that it may not fully eliminate unfaithful reasoning branches and that further research is needed to improve the reliability and scalability of the techniques.
One potential concern is the reliance on symbolic reasoning, which could make the approach less applicable to more open-ended, natural language tasks that LLMs excel at. Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive evaluation of the computational and resource requirements of the proposed framework, which could be an important practical consideration.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to make LLMs more transparent, reliable, and aligned with human reasoning processes. The ideas presented here could have significant implications for the development of more trustworthy and interpretable large language models, with applications across a wide range of domains.
Conclusion
This paper tackles the challenging problem of achieving faithful, step-by-step reasoning in large language models. By proposing a new framework that combines symbolic reasoning, multilingual instruction tuning, and unfaithful reasoning detection, the researchers have taken an important step towards creating LLMs that can reliably solve complex problems while providing transparent, trustworthy explanations of their problem-solving process.
While the approach has some limitations and requires further refinement, the insights and techniques presented in this paper could have far-reaching implications for the field of natural language processing and the development of more reliable and interpretable AI systems. As LLMs become increasingly integrated into critical decision-making processes, the ability to understand and trust their reasoning will be crucial for ensuring the safe and ethical deployment of these powerful technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Towards Faithful Chain-of-Thought: Large Language Models are Bridging Reasoners
Jiachun Li, Pengfei Cao, Yubo Chen, Kang Liu, Jun Zhao
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) suffer from serious unfaithful chain-of-thought (CoT) issues. Previous work attempts to measure and explain it but lacks in-depth analysis within CoTs and does not consider the interactions among all reasoning components jointly. In this paper, we first study the CoT faithfulness issue at the granularity of CoT steps, identify two reasoning paradigms: centralized reasoning and distributed reasoning, and find their relationship with faithfulness. Subsequently, we conduct a joint analysis of the causal relevance among the context, CoT, and answer during reasoning. The result proves that, when the LLM predicts answers, it can recall correct information missing in the CoT from the context, leading to unfaithfulness issues. Finally, we propose the inferential bridging method to mitigate this issue, in which we use the attribution method to recall information as hints for CoT generation and filter out noisy CoTs based on their semantic consistency and attribution scores. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach effectively alleviates the unfaithful CoT problem.
5/30/2024
Chain-of-Thought Unfaithfulness as Disguised Accuracy
Oliver Bentham, Nathan Stringham, Ana Marasovi'c
0
0
Understanding the extent to which Chain-of-Thought (CoT) generations align with a large language model's (LLM) internal computations is critical for deciding whether to trust an LLM's output. As a proxy for CoT faithfulness, Lanham et al. (2023) propose a metric that measures a model's dependence on its CoT for producing an answer. Within a single family of proprietary models, they find that LLMs exhibit a scaling-then-inverse-scaling relationship between model size and their measure of faithfulness, and that a 13 billion parameter model exhibits increased faithfulness compared to models ranging from 810 million to 175 billion parameters in size. We evaluate whether these results generalize as a property of all LLMs. We replicate the experimental setup in their section focused on scaling experiments with three different families of models and, under specific conditions, successfully reproduce the scaling trends for CoT faithfulness they report. However, after normalizing the metric to account for a model's bias toward certain answer choices, unfaithfulness drops significantly for smaller less-capable models. This normalized faithfulness metric is also strongly correlated ($R^2$=0.74) with accuracy, raising doubts about its validity for evaluating faithfulness.
6/24/2024
š¤
How to think step-by-step: A mechanistic understanding of chain-of-thought reasoning
Subhabrata Dutta, Joykirat Singh, Soumen Chakrabarti, Tanmoy Chakraborty
0
0
Despite superior reasoning prowess demonstrated by Large Language Models (LLMs) with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, a lack of understanding prevails around the internal mechanisms of the models that facilitate CoT generation. This work investigates the neural sub-structures within LLMs that manifest CoT reasoning from a mechanistic point of view. From an analysis of Llama-2 7B applied to multistep reasoning over fictional ontologies, we demonstrate that LLMs deploy multiple parallel pathways of answer generation for step-by-step reasoning. These parallel pathways provide sequential answers from the input question context as well as the generated CoT. We observe a functional rift in the middle layers of the LLM. Token representations in the initial half remain strongly biased towards the pretraining prior, with the in-context prior taking over in the later half. This internal phase shift manifests in different functional components: attention heads that write the answer token appear in the later half, attention heads that move information along ontological relationships appear in the initial half, and so on. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt towards mechanistic investigation of CoT reasoning in LLMs.
5/7/2024
Direct Evaluation of Chain-of-Thought in Multi-hop Reasoning with Knowledge Graphs
Minh-Vuong Nguyen, Linhao Luo, Fatemeh Shiri, Dinh Phung, Yuan-Fang Li, Thuy-Trang Vu, Gholamreza Haffari
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning abilities when prompted to generate chain-of-thought (CoT) explanations alongside answers. However, previous research on evaluating LLMs has solely focused on answer accuracy, neglecting the correctness of the generated CoT. In this paper, we delve deeper into the CoT reasoning capabilities of LLMs in multi-hop question answering by utilizing knowledge graphs (KGs). We propose a novel discriminative and generative CoT evaluation paradigm to assess LLMs' knowledge of reasoning and the accuracy of the generated CoT. Through experiments conducted on 5 different families of LLMs across 2 multi-hop question-answering datasets, we find that LLMs possess sufficient knowledge to perform reasoning. However, there exists a significant disparity between answer accuracy and faithfulness of the CoT reasoning generated by LLMs, indicating that they often arrive at correct answers through incorrect reasoning.
6/21/2024