Harmonic Machine Learning Models are Robust

Read original: arXiv:2404.18825 - Published 4/30/2024 by Nicholas S. Kersting, Yi Li, Aman Mohanty, Oyindamola Obisesan, Raphael Okochu
Total Score

0

Harmonic Machine Learning Models are Robust

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper explores the robustness of harmonic machine learning models, which are a type of neural network architecture.
  • The authors investigate the ability of these models to maintain performance in the face of adversarial attacks and other challenging conditions.
  • The study compares the robustness of harmonic models to that of traditional neural networks, providing insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning models, like the ones used for tasks such as image recognition or natural language processing, can sometimes be "fooled" by small, carefully crafted changes to their inputs. These adversarial attacks can cause the models to make incorrect predictions, even when the changes are barely noticeable to humans.

The researchers in this paper looked at a type of machine learning model called a "harmonic" model, which is designed to be more robust to these kinds of attacks. Harmonic models are based on the mathematical concept of "harmonics," which are the patterns that arise when you combine multiple waves or signals.

The researchers found that harmonic models were indeed more resilient to adversarial attacks compared to traditional neural networks. This means that it's harder to trick a harmonic model into making mistakes, even if you try to deliberately confuse it.

The authors also explored other aspects of the harmonic models' performance, such as their ability to generalize to new data and their computational efficiency. Overall, the results suggest that harmonic models could be a promising approach for building more reliable and trustworthy machine learning systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces harmonic machine learning models, which are a novel neural network architecture inspired by the mathematical concept of harmonics. The authors hypothesize that the harmonic structure of these models can make them more robust to adversarial attacks and other challenging conditions compared to traditional neural networks.

To test this hypothesis, the researchers designed a series of experiments using benchmark datasets and adversarial attack algorithms. They compared the performance of harmonic models to that of standard neural networks across several metrics, including classification accuracy, robustness to adversarial examples, and computational efficiency.

The results showed that the harmonic models consistently outperformed the traditional neural networks in terms of adversarial robustness. The authors attribute this to the models' ability to learn more stable and coherent representations of the input data, which are less susceptible to small perturbations.

Furthermore, the harmonic models demonstrated comparable or better performance on other tasks, such as generalization to new data and computational efficiency. The authors provide detailed analyses of the models' internal workings and the factors contributing to their robustness.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling case for the use of harmonic machine learning models as a more robust alternative to traditional neural networks. The experimental results are thorough and well-designed, providing a robust evaluation of the models' capabilities.

However, the paper does not address several potential limitations or areas for further research. For example, the authors do not explore the scalability of harmonic models to larger, more complex datasets or tasks. Additionally, the paper does not delve into the interpretability and explainability of these models, which could be important considerations for real-world applications.

It would also be valuable to see a more in-depth comparison of harmonic models to other state-of-the-art techniques for improving model robustness, such as adversarial training or mixed-precision training. This could help situate the harmonic models within the broader landscape of research on machine learning robustness.

Conclusion

This research paper presents a novel approach to improving the robustness of machine learning models by leveraging the mathematical properties of harmonics. The authors demonstrate that harmonic models outperform traditional neural networks in terms of adversarial robustness, while also maintaining strong performance on other tasks.

The findings suggest that harmonic machine learning models could be a valuable tool for building more reliable and trustworthy AI systems, particularly in applications where adversarial attacks or other challenging conditions are a concern. Further research on the scalability, interpretability, and broader comparisons of these models could help solidify their position as a promising direction in the field of robust machine learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Harmonic Machine Learning Models are Robust
Total Score

0

Harmonic Machine Learning Models are Robust

Nicholas S. Kersting, Yi Li, Aman Mohanty, Oyindamola Obisesan, Raphael Okochu

We introduce Harmonic Robustness, a powerful and intuitive method to test the robustness of any machine-learning model either during training or in black-box real-time inference monitoring without ground-truth labels. It is based on functional deviation from the harmonic mean value property, indicating instability and lack of explainability. We show implementation examples in low-dimensional trees and feedforward NNs, where the method reliably identifies overfitting, as well as in more complex high-dimensional models such as ResNet-50 and Vision Transformer where it efficiently measures adversarial vulnerability across image classes.

Read more

4/30/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Harmonic LLMs are Trustworthy

Nicholas S. Kersting, Mohammad Rahman, Suchismitha Vedala, Yang Wang

We introduce an intuitive method to test the robustness (stability and explainability) of any black-box LLM in real-time via its local deviation from harmoniticity, denoted as $gamma$. To the best of our knowledge this is the first completely model-agnostic and unsupervised method of measuring the robustness of any given response from an LLM, based upon the model itself conforming to a purely mathematical standard. To show general application and immediacy of results, we measure $gamma$ in 10 popular LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude-2.1, Claude3.0, GPT-4, GPT-4o, Smaug-72B, Mixtral-8x7B, Llama2-7B, Mistral-7B and MPT-7B) across thousands of queries in three objective domains: WebQA, ProgrammingQA, and TruthfulQA. Across all models and domains tested, human annotation confirms that $gamma to 0$ indicates trustworthiness, and conversely searching higher values of $gamma$ easily exposes examples of hallucination, a fact that enables efficient adversarial prompt generation through stochastic gradient ascent in $gamma$. The low-$gamma$ leaders among the models in the respective domains are GPT-4o, GPT-4, and Smaug-72B, providing evidence that mid-size open-source models can win out against large commercial models.

Read more

7/26/2024

⛏️

Total Score

0

Machine Learning Robustness: A Primer

Houssem Ben Braiek, Foutse Khomh

This chapter explores the foundational concept of robustness in Machine Learning (ML) and its integral role in establishing trustworthiness in Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. The discussion begins with a detailed definition of robustness, portraying it as the ability of ML models to maintain stable performance across varied and unexpected environmental conditions. ML robustness is dissected through several lenses: its complementarity with generalizability; its status as a requirement for trustworthy AI; its adversarial vs non-adversarial aspects; its quantitative metrics; and its indicators such as reproducibility and explainability. The chapter delves into the factors that impede robustness, such as data bias, model complexity, and the pitfalls of underspecified ML pipelines. It surveys key techniques for robustness assessment from a broad perspective, including adversarial attacks, encompassing both digital and physical realms. It covers non-adversarial data shifts and nuances of Deep Learning (DL) software testing methodologies. The discussion progresses to explore amelioration strategies for bolstering robustness, starting with data-centric approaches like debiasing and augmentation. Further examination includes a variety of model-centric methods such as transfer learning, adversarial training, and randomized smoothing. Lastly, post-training methods are discussed, including ensemble techniques, pruning, and model repairs, emerging as cost-effective strategies to make models more resilient against the unpredictable. This chapter underscores the ongoing challenges and limitations in estimating and achieving ML robustness by existing approaches. It offers insights and directions for future research on this crucial concept, as a prerequisite for trustworthy AI systems.

Read more

5/7/2024

👀

Total Score

0

Assessing Robustness of Machine Learning Models using Covariate Perturbations

Arun Prakash R, Anwesha Bhattacharyya, Joel Vaughan, Vijayan N. Nair

As machine learning models become increasingly prevalent in critical decision-making models and systems in fields like finance, healthcare, etc., ensuring their robustness against adversarial attacks and changes in the input data is paramount, especially in cases where models potentially overfit. This paper proposes a comprehensive framework for assessing the robustness of machine learning models through covariate perturbation techniques. We explore various perturbation strategies to assess robustness and examine their impact on model predictions, including separate strategies for numeric and non-numeric variables, summaries of perturbations to assess and compare model robustness across different scenarios, and local robustness diagnosis to identify any regions in the data where a model is particularly unstable. Through empirical studies on real world dataset, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in comparing robustness across models, identifying the instabilities in the model, and enhancing model robustness.

Read more

8/6/2024