MixedNUTS: Training-Free Accuracy-Robustness Balance via Nonlinearly Mixed Classifiers

Read original: arXiv:2402.02263 - Published 9/10/2024 by Yatong Bai, Mo Zhou, Vishal M. Patel, Somayeh Sojoudi
Total Score

0

🔍

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Adversarial robustness often comes at the cost of reduced accuracy, making it challenging to deploy robust classification models in real-world applications.
  • Existing training-based solutions to improve the accuracy-robustness tradeoff are limited by their incompatibility with pre-trained high-performance models.
  • The paper proposes a training-free ensemble approach called MixedNUTS that aims to reconcile accuracy and robustness by leveraging the observation that robust models are more confident in correct predictions than incorrect ones.

Plain English Explanation

Artificial intelligence (AI) models are often trained to be robust against adversarial attacks, which are small, imperceptible changes to the input that can cause the model to make incorrect predictions. However, this robustness often comes at the cost of reduced accuracy on normal, non-adversarial data. This trade-off has made it difficult to deploy these robust models in real-world applications.

The researchers behind this paper noticed that robust models tend to be more confident in their correct predictions than their incorrect predictions, even on both clean and adversarial data. They speculated that amplifying this "benign confidence" property could help reconcile the accuracy-robustness trade-off.

To achieve this, they developed a training-free ensemble approach called MixedNUTS. MixedNUTS takes the output logits (a measure of confidence) from both a robust classifier and a standard non-robust classifier, applies some simple mathematical transformations to them, and then combines the transformed logits into a final probability-based prediction.

The researchers tested MixedNUTS on popular image classification datasets like CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet, using custom strong adaptive attacks to evaluate its performance. The results were impressive – MixedNUTS was able to significantly improve the clean accuracy of the CIFAR-100 model by 7.86 points, while only sacrificing 0.87 points in robust accuracy.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a training-free ensemble method called MixedNUTS that aims to improve the accuracy-robustness trade-off in classification models. The key observation is that robust models tend to be more confident in their correct predictions than their incorrect predictions, even on both clean and adversarial data.

MixedNUTS takes the output logits (a measure of confidence) from both a robust classifier and a standard non-robust classifier, and applies a simple nonlinear transformation to them. This transformation has only three parameters, which are optimized through an efficient algorithm. The transformed logits are then converted into probabilities and mixed as the overall output.

The researchers evaluated MixedNUTS on the CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet datasets, using custom strong adaptive attacks to assess its performance. The results show that MixedNUTS can significantly improve clean accuracy while maintaining near-state-of-the-art robustness. For example, on CIFAR-100, MixedNUTS boosted the clean accuracy by 7.86 points, while only sacrificing 0.87 points in robust accuracy.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to address the accuracy-robustness trade-off in classification models. The training-free nature of MixedNUTS is particularly appealing, as it allows the method to be easily integrated with pre-trained high-performance models without the need for costly retraining.

However, the paper does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the limitations and potential issues with the proposed approach. For example, it would be interesting to understand how MixedNUTS performs on a wider range of datasets and attack scenarios, and whether the method is sensitive to the choice of base classifiers.

Additionally, the paper could have explored the interpretability of the learned nonlinear transformations in MixedNUTS, as this could shed light on the underlying mechanisms that enable the improved accuracy-robustness trade-off.

Finally, while the custom strong adaptive attacks used in the evaluation are commendable, it would be valuable to also assess the model's performance against established adversarial attack benchmarks, such as those used in the Logit Calibration for Feature Contrast in Robust Federated Learning and Adversarial Training for the 1-Nearest Neighbor Classifier papers, to allow for more direct comparisons with other state-of-the-art methods.

Conclusion

The MixedNUTS approach proposed in this paper represents a significant step towards reconciling the accuracy-robustness trade-off in classification models. By leveraging the observation that robust models exhibit a "benign confidence" property, the researchers have developed a simple yet effective training-free ensemble method that can substantially improve clean accuracy while maintaining near-state-of-the-art robustness.

This work is particularly relevant in the context of the growing concerns around the robustness of NLP models and the need for robust and accurate classifiers in real-world applications. The promising results of MixedNUTS on challenging image classification datasets suggest that this approach could be a valuable tool for developers and researchers working to deploy reliable and high-performing AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔍

Total Score

0

MixedNUTS: Training-Free Accuracy-Robustness Balance via Nonlinearly Mixed Classifiers

Yatong Bai, Mo Zhou, Vishal M. Patel, Somayeh Sojoudi

Adversarial robustness often comes at the cost of degraded accuracy, impeding real-life applications of robust classification models. Training-based solutions for better trade-offs are limited by incompatibilities with already-trained high-performance large models, necessitating the exploration of training-free ensemble approaches. Observing that robust models are more confident in correct predictions than in incorrect ones on clean and adversarial data alike, we speculate amplifying this benign confidence property can reconcile accuracy and robustness in an ensemble setting. To achieve so, we propose MixedNUTS, a training-free method where the output logits of a robust classifier and a standard non-robust classifier are processed by nonlinear transformations with only three parameters, which are optimized through an efficient algorithm. MixedNUTS then converts the transformed logits into probabilities and mixes them as the overall output. On CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet datasets, experimental results with custom strong adaptive attacks demonstrate MixedNUTS's vastly improved accuracy and near-SOTA robustness -- it boosts CIFAR-100 clean accuracy by 7.86 points, sacrificing merely 0.87 points in robust accuracy.

Read more

9/10/2024

Mixing Classifiers to Alleviate the Accuracy-Robustness Trade-Off
Total Score

0

Mixing Classifiers to Alleviate the Accuracy-Robustness Trade-Off

Yatong Bai, Brendon G. Anderson, Somayeh Sojoudi

Deep neural classifiers have recently found tremendous success in data-driven control systems. However, existing models suffer from a trade-off between accuracy and adversarial robustness. This limitation must be overcome in the control of safety-critical systems that require both high performance and rigorous robustness guarantees. In this work, we develop classifiers that simultaneously inherit high robustness from robust models and high accuracy from standard models. Specifically, we propose a theoretically motivated formulation that mixes the output probabilities of a standard neural network and a robust neural network. Both base classifiers are pre-trained, and thus our method does not require additional training. Our numerical experiments verify that the mixed classifier noticeably improves the accuracy-robustness trade-off and identify the confidence property of the robust base classifier as the key leverage of this more benign trade-off. Our theoretical results prove that under mild assumptions, when the robustness of the robust base model is certifiable, no alteration or attack within a closed-form $ell_p$ radius on an input can result in the misclassification of the mixed classifier.

Read more

6/5/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

Improving the Accuracy-Robustness Trade-Off of Classifiers via Adaptive Smoothing

Yatong Bai, Brendon G. Anderson, Aerin Kim, Somayeh Sojoudi

While prior research has proposed a plethora of methods that build neural classifiers robust against adversarial robustness, practitioners are still reluctant to adopt them due to their unacceptably severe clean accuracy penalties. This paper significantly alleviates this accuracy-robustness trade-off by mixing the output probabilities of a standard classifier and a robust classifier, where the standard network is optimized for clean accuracy and is not robust in general. We show that the robust base classifier's confidence difference for correct and incorrect examples is the key to this improvement. In addition to providing intuitions and empirical evidence, we theoretically certify the robustness of the mixed classifier under realistic assumptions. Furthermore, we adapt an adversarial input detector into a mixing network that adaptively adjusts the mixture of the two base models, further reducing the accuracy penalty of achieving robustness. The proposed flexible method, termed adaptive smoothing, can work in conjunction with existing or even future methods that improve clean accuracy, robustness, or adversary detection. Our empirical evaluation considers strong attack methods, including AutoAttack and adaptive attack. On the CIFAR-100 dataset, our method achieves an 85.21% clean accuracy while maintaining a 38.72% $ell_infty$-AutoAttacked ($epsilon = 8/255$) accuracy, becoming the second most robust method on the RobustBench CIFAR-100 benchmark as of submission, while improving the clean accuracy by ten percentage points compared with all listed models. The code that implements our method is available at https://github.com/Bai-YT/AdaptiveSmoothing.

Read more

7/23/2024

Certified Robust Accuracy of Neural Networks Are Bounded due to Bayes Errors
Total Score

0

Certified Robust Accuracy of Neural Networks Are Bounded due to Bayes Errors

Ruihan Zhang, Jun Sun

Adversarial examples pose a security threat to many critical systems built on neural networks. While certified training improves robustness, it also decreases accuracy noticeably. Despite various proposals for addressing this issue, the significant accuracy drop remains. More importantly, it is not clear whether there is a certain fundamental limit on achieving robustness whilst maintaining accuracy. In this work, we offer a novel perspective based on Bayes errors. By adopting Bayes error to robustness analysis, we investigate the limit of certified robust accuracy, taking into account data distribution uncertainties. We first show that the accuracy inevitably decreases in the pursuit of robustness due to changed Bayes error in the altered data distribution. Subsequently, we establish an upper bound for certified robust accuracy, considering the distribution of individual classes and their boundaries. Our theoretical results are empirically evaluated on real-world datasets and are shown to be consistent with the limited success of existing certified training results, e.g., for CIFAR10, our analysis results in an upper bound (of certified robust accuracy) of 67.49%, meanwhile existing approaches are only able to increase it from 53.89% in 2017 to 62.84% in 2023.

Read more

6/21/2024