Harvard Undergraduate Survey on Generative AI
4
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Explores the rise of generative AI from a student's perspective
- Examines the purpose of this report in understanding the potential implications of generative AI in human-computer interaction (HCI) and education
Plain English Explanation
This paper discusses the growing influence of generative AI, such as ChatGPT, from the viewpoint of a student. It aims to explore the potential impacts of these powerful AI systems on fields like human-computer interaction (HCI) and education.
The paper acknowledges the rapid advancements in generative AI technology and how it is changing the way we interact with computers and learn. The authors recognize the need to understand the implications of these changes, both positive and negative, to ensure that the education system and HCI practices can adapt and thrive in this new landscape.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a student's perspective on the rise of generative AI and its potential impact on HCI and education. It discusses the rapid advancements in generative AI models and how they are transforming the way we interact with technology and learn.
The authors explore the purpose of this report, which is to investigate the potential implications of generative AI in these fields. They aim to understand how generative AI can empower new approaches to education and HCI, as well as any potential challenges or drawbacks that may arise.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges the potential benefits of generative AI in education and HCI, such as personalized learning experiences and enhanced human-computer interaction. However, it also raises concerns about the potential misuse or unintended consequences of these technologies.
The authors encourage readers to think critically about the research and form their own opinions on the role of generative AI in these domains. They recognize the need for ongoing discussion and further research to fully understand the implications and ensure that the integration of these technologies is done responsibly and ethically.
Conclusion
This paper provides a student's perspective on the rise of generative AI and its potential impact on HCI and education. It highlights the need to understand the implications of these advancements, both positive and negative, to ensure that the education system and HCI practices can adapt and thrive in this new landscape. The authors call for continued exploration and critical analysis of the role of generative AI in these fields to ensure its responsible and beneficial implementation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
4
Harvard Undergraduate Survey on Generative AI
Shikoh Hirabayashi, Rishab Jain, Nikola Jurkovi'c, Gabriel Wu
How has generative AI impacted the experiences of college students? We study the influence of AI on the study habits, class choices, and career prospects of Harvard undergraduates (n=326), finding that almost 90% of students use generative AI. For roughly 25% of these students, AI has begun to substitute for attending office hours and completing required readings. Half of students are concerned that AI will negatively impact their job prospects, and over half of students wish that Harvard had more classes on the future impacts of AI. We also investigate students' outlook on the broader social implications of AI, finding that half of students are worried that AI will increase economic inequality, and 40% believe that extinction risk from AI should be treated as a global priority with the same urgency as pandemics and nuclear war. Around half of students who have taken a class on AI expect AI to exceed human capabilities on almost all tasks within 30 years. We make some recommendations to the Harvard community in light of these results.
Read more6/4/2024
🤖
0
The Potential and Implications of Generative AI on HCI Education
Ahmed Kharrufa, Ian G Johnson
Generative AI (GAI) is impacting teaching and learning directly or indirectly across a range of subjects and disciplines. As educators, we need to understand the potential and limitations of AI in HCI education and ensure our graduating HCI students are aware of the potential and limitations of AI in HCI. In this paper, we report on the main pedagogical insights gained from the inclusion of generative AI into a 10 week undergraduate module. We designed the module to encourage student experimentation with GAI models as part of the design brief requirement and planned practical sessions and discussions. Our insights are based on replies to a survey sent out to the students after completing the module. Our key findings, for HCI educators, report on the use of AI as a persona for developing project ideas and creating resources for design, and AI as a mirror for reflecting students' understanding of key concepts and ideas and highlighting knowledge gaps. We also discuss potential pitfalls that should be considered and the need to assess students' literacies and assumptions of GAIs as pedagogical tools. Finally, we put forward the case for educators to take the opportunities GAI presents as an educational tool and be experimental, creative, and courageous in their practice. We end with a discussion of our findings in relation to the TPACK framework in HCI.
Read more5/9/2024
0
The Evolution of Learning: Assessing the Transformative Impact of Generative AI on Higher Education
Stefanie Krause, Bhumi Hitesh Panchal, Nikhil Ubhe
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) models such as ChatGPT have experienced a surge in popularity, attracting 100 million active users in 2 months and generating an estimated 10 million daily queries. Despite this remarkable adoption, there remains a limited understanding to which extent this innovative technology influences higher education. This research paper investigates the impact of GAI on university students and Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). The study adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining a comprehensive survey with scenario analysis to explore potential benefits, drawbacks, and transformative changes the new technology brings. Using an online survey with 130 participants we assessed students' perspectives and attitudes concerning present ChatGPT usage in academics. Results show that students use the current technology for tasks like assignment writing and exam preparation and believe it to be a effective help in achieving academic goals. The scenario analysis afterwards projected potential future scenarios, providing valuable insights into the possibilities and challenges associated with incorporating GAI into higher education. The main motivation is to gain a tangible and precise understanding of the potential consequences for HEIs and to provide guidance responding to the evolving learning environment. The findings indicate that irresponsible and excessive use of the technology could result in significant challenges. Hence, HEIs must develop stringent policies, reevaluate learning objectives, upskill their lecturers, adjust the curriculum and reconsider examination approaches.
Read more4/17/2024
0
Generative AI and Teachers -- For Us or Against Us? A Case Study
Jenny Pettersson, Elias Hult, Tim Eriksson, Tosin Adewumi
We present insightful results of a survey on the adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) by university teachers in their teaching activities. The transformation of education by GenAI, particularly large language models (LLMs), has been presenting both opportunities and challenges, including cheating by students. We prepared the online survey according to best practices and the questions were created by the authors, who have pedagogy experience. The survey contained 12 questions and a pilot study was first conducted. The survey was then sent to all teachers in multiple departments across different campuses of the university of interest in Sweden: Lule{aa} University of Technology. The survey was available in both Swedish and English. The results show that 35 teachers (more than half) use GenAI out of 67 respondents. Preparation is the teaching activity with the most frequency that GenAI is used for and ChatGPT is the most commonly used GenAI. 59% say it has impacted their teaching, however, 55% say there should be legislation around the use of GenAI, especially as inaccuracies and cheating are the biggest concerns.
Read more4/5/2024