High-dimensional Learning with Noisy Labels
2405.14088
0
0
🤯
Abstract
This paper provides theoretical insights into high-dimensional binary classification with class-conditional noisy labels. Specifically, we study the behavior of a linear classifier with a label noisiness aware loss function, when both the dimension of data $p$ and the sample size $n$ are large and comparable. Relying on random matrix theory by supposing a Gaussian mixture data model, the performance of the linear classifier when $p,nto infty$ is shown to converge towards a limit, involving scalar statistics of the data. Importantly, our findings show that the low-dimensional intuitions to handle label noise do not hold in high-dimension, in the sense that the optimal classifier in low-dimension dramatically fails in high-dimension. Based on our derivations, we design an optimized method that is shown to be provably more efficient in handling noisy labels in high dimensions. Our theoretical conclusions are further confirmed by experiments on real datasets, where we show that our optimized approach outperforms the considered baselines.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the behavior of a linear classifier with a label noise-aware loss function in high-dimensional binary classification tasks.
- The researchers use random matrix theory and a Gaussian mixture data model to analyze the classifier's performance as the data dimension (p) and sample size (n) become large and comparable.
- The key finding is that low-dimensional intuitions about handling label noise do not hold in high dimensions, and the optimal classifier in low dimensions can fail dramatically in high dimensions.
- The researchers design an optimized method that is shown to be more effective at handling noisy labels in high-dimensional settings.
Plain English Explanation
In machine learning, classifying data into different categories is a common task. However, sometimes the labels (the categories) assigned to the data can be noisy or inaccurate. This paper looks at how to build a good classifier when the labels are noisy, especially in high-dimensional data (where there are many features or characteristics of the data).
The researchers use a mathematical model to represent the data and labels, and then study how a linear classifier (a simple type of classifier) behaves as the number of data points and the number of features both get very large. They find that the best way to handle noisy labels in low-dimensional data doesn't work well in high-dimensional data. Instead, they develop a new, optimized method that is better at dealing with noisy labels in high dimensions.
The key insight is that the traditional approaches to handling noisy labels don't translate well to high-dimensional data. The researchers' new method is designed to work better in these high-dimensional, noisy label settings, which are common in many real-world applications of machine learning.
Technical Explanation
The paper analyzes the behavior of a linear classifier with a label noise-aware loss function in a high-dimensional binary classification setting. Relying on random matrix theory and a Gaussian mixture data model, the researchers study the performance of this classifier as both the data dimension (p) and sample size (n) become large and comparable.
The key finding is that the optimal classifier in low-dimensional settings with noisy labels does not perform well in high-dimensional regimes. The researchers derive a limit theorem that characterizes the classifier's performance in the high-dimensional, large sample size setting. This limit theorem involves scalar statistics of the data, which the researchers use to design an optimized method for handling noisy labels in high dimensions.
Experiments on real datasets confirm that the researchers' optimized approach outperforms baseline methods for dealing with noisy labels in high-dimensional classification tasks. This suggests that the traditional intuitions about handling label noise do not directly translate to the high-dimensional case, and that new techniques are needed to address this challenge.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable theoretical insights into the behavior of linear classifiers in high-dimensional settings with noisy labels. The use of random matrix theory and the Gaussian mixture data model allows the researchers to derive precise characterizations of the classifier's performance as p and n grow large.
However, the paper does not address the potential limitations of these modeling assumptions. For example, the Gaussian mixture model may not accurately capture the true data distribution in all real-world high-dimensional classification tasks. Further research could explore the sensitivity of the results to the choice of data model.
Additionally, the paper focuses solely on linear classifiers, which may not be the optimal choice for all high-dimensional, noisy label problems. Extensions to more complex classifier architectures, such as deep neural networks, would be an important area for future work.
Finally, while the paper presents an optimized method for handling noisy labels in high dimensions, it does not provide a comprehensive comparison to other state-of-the-art techniques for dealing with this challenge. A more thorough empirical evaluation would help further validate the advantages of the proposed approach.
Conclusion
This paper offers valuable theoretical insights into the behavior of linear classifiers in high-dimensional settings with noisy labels. The key finding is that the traditional approaches to handling label noise do not translate well to high-dimensional data, and the researchers develop an optimized method that is more effective in these settings.
The results have important implications for the design of machine learning systems in real-world applications, where high-dimensional data and noisy labels are common. By better understanding the limitations of existing techniques and developing more robust methods, researchers can build more accurate and reliable classification models, with benefits across a wide range of domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Estimating Noisy Class Posterior with Part-level Labels for Noisy Label Learning
Rui Zhao, Bin Shi, Jianfei Ruan, Tianze Pan, Bo Dong
0
0
In noisy label learning, estimating noisy class posteriors plays a fundamental role for developing consistent classifiers, as it forms the basis for estimating clean class posteriors and the transition matrix. Existing methods typically learn noisy class posteriors by training a classification model with noisy labels. However, when labels are incorrect, these models may be misled to overemphasize the feature parts that do not reflect the instance characteristics, resulting in significant errors in estimating noisy class posteriors. To address this issue, this paper proposes to augment the supervised information with part-level labels, encouraging the model to focus on and integrate richer information from various parts. Specifically, our method first partitions features into distinct parts by cropping instances, yielding part-level labels associated with these various parts. Subsequently, we introduce a novel single-to-multiple transition matrix to model the relationship between the noisy and part-level labels, which incorporates part-level labels into a classifier-consistent framework. Utilizing this framework with part-level labels, we can learn the noisy class posteriors more precisely by guiding the model to integrate information from various parts, ultimately improving the classification performance. Our method is theoretically sound, while experiments show that it is empirically effective in synthetic and real-world noisy benchmarks.
5/10/2024
Rethinking the impact of noisy labels in graph classification: A utility and privacy perspective
De Li, Xianxian Li, Zeming Gan, Qiyu Li, Bin Qu, Jinyan Wang
0
0
Graph neural networks based on message-passing mechanisms have achieved advanced results in graph classification tasks. However, their generalization performance degrades when noisy labels are present in the training data. Most existing noisy labeling approaches focus on the visual domain or graph node classification tasks and analyze the impact of noisy labels only from a utility perspective. Unlike existing work, in this paper, we measure the effects of noise labels on graph classification from data privacy and model utility perspectives. We find that noise labels degrade the model's generalization performance and enhance the ability of membership inference attacks on graph data privacy. To this end, we propose the robust graph neural network approach with noisy labeled graph classification. Specifically, we first accurately filter the noisy samples by high-confidence samples and the first feature principal component vector of each class. Then, the robust principal component vectors and the model output under data augmentation are utilized to achieve noise label correction guided by dual spatial information. Finally, supervised graph contrastive learning is introduced to enhance the embedding quality of the model and protect the privacy of the training graph data. The utility and privacy of the proposed method are validated by comparing twelve different methods on eight real graph classification datasets. Compared with the state-of-the-art methods, the RGLC method achieves at most and at least 7.8% and 0.8% performance gain at 30% noisy labeling rate, respectively, and reduces the accuracy of privacy attacks to below 60%.
6/12/2024
Classifying Overlapping Gaussian Mixtures in High Dimensions: From Optimal Classifiers to Neural Nets
Khen Cohen, Noam Levi, Yaron Oz
0
0
We derive closed-form expressions for the Bayes optimal decision boundaries in binary classification of high dimensional overlapping Gaussian mixture model (GMM) data, and show how they depend on the eigenstructure of the class covariances, for particularly interesting structured data. We empirically demonstrate, through experiments on synthetic GMMs inspired by real-world data, that deep neural networks trained for classification, learn predictors which approximate the derived optimal classifiers. We further extend our study to networks trained on authentic data, observing that decision thresholds correlate with the covariance eigenvectors rather than the eigenvalues, mirroring our GMM analysis. This provides theoretical insights regarding neural networks' ability to perform probabilistic inference and distill statistical patterns from intricate distributions.
5/29/2024
📈
Investigating the Impact of Model Width and Density on Generalization in Presence of Label Noise
Yihao Xue, Kyle Whitecross, Baharan Mirzasoleiman
0
0
Increasing the size of overparameterized neural networks has been a key in achieving state-of-the-art performance. This is captured by the double descent phenomenon, where the test loss follows a decreasing-increasing-decreasing pattern (or sometimes monotonically decreasing) as model width increases. However, the effect of label noise on the test loss curve has not been fully explored. In this work, we uncover an intriguing phenomenon where label noise leads to a textit{final ascent} in the originally observed double descent curve. Specifically, under a sufficiently large noise-to-sample-size ratio, optimal generalization is achieved at intermediate widths. Through theoretical analysis, we attribute this phenomenon to the shape transition of test loss variance induced by label noise. Furthermore, we extend the final ascent phenomenon to model density and provide the first theoretical characterization showing that reducing density by randomly dropping trainable parameters improves generalization under label noise. We also thoroughly examine the roles of regularization and sample size. Surprisingly, we find that larger $ell_2$ regularization and robust learning methods against label noise exacerbate the final ascent. We confirm the validity of our findings through extensive experiments on ReLu networks trained on MNIST, ResNets/ViTs trained on CIFAR-10/100, and InceptionResNet-v2 trained on Stanford Cars with real-world noisy labels.
5/9/2024