Investigating the Impact of Model Width and Density on Generalization in Presence of Label Noise

Overview

• This paper explores the effect of label noise on the test loss curve of overparameterized neural networks, which is known as the "double descent" phenomenon.
• The authors uncover an "intriguing" final ascent in the double descent curve when there is a large enough ratio of label noise to sample size.
• This means optimal generalization is achieved at intermediate network widths, rather than at the largest widths.
• The authors provide theoretical analysis to attribute this to the shape transition of test loss variance induced by label noise.
• They also extend the final ascent phenomenon to model density and show that reducing density can improve generalization under label noise.
• Surprisingly, the authors find that larger L2 regularization and robust learning methods against label noise can exacerbate the final ascent.

Plain English Explanation

As neural networks become larger and more complex, their performance often follows a "double descent" pattern - the test loss first decreases, then increases, and then decreases again as the network size grows.

However, this paper shows that when the training data has noisy or incorrect labels, the double descent curve can take an unexpected "final ascent" - the test loss starts to increase again at the largest network sizes. This means that for networks trained on noisy data, the best performance may actually be achieved at intermediate sizes, not the largest sizes.

The authors explain this using math and theory - the noise in the labels causes the variance of the test loss to change in a way that leads to this final ascent. They also show that this final ascent phenomenon applies not just to network size, but also to the "density" or number of active parameters in the network.

Interestingly, the authors find that techniques often used to improve learning on noisy data, like stronger regularization or robust training methods, can actually make the final ascent problem worse. This is a surprising and counterintuitive result.

Overall, this paper uncovers an intriguing new way that noise in training data can fundamentally alter the typical scaling behavior of large neural networks. It provides important theoretical insights and has implications for how we design and train neural networks in the real world, where noisy or imperfect data is often unavoidable.

Technical Explanation

The authors investigate the effect of label noise on the well-known "double descent" phenomenon, where the test loss of overparameterized neural networks follows a decreasing-increasing-decreasing pattern as the model width increases.

Through theoretical analysis, the authors uncover an "intriguing" final ascent in the originally observed double descent curve when there is a sufficiently large ratio of label noise to sample size. This means that under label noise, optimal generalization is achieved at intermediate widths, rather than at the largest widths.

The authors attribute this phenomenon to the shape transition of test loss variance induced by label noise. They provide a detailed theoretical characterization showing that the final ascent arises from the interplay between the bias and variance terms in the test loss.

Furthermore, the authors extend the final ascent phenomenon to model density, providing the first theoretical result showing that reducing density by randomly dropping trainable parameters can improve generalization under label noise.

Surprisingly, the authors find that larger L2 regularization and robust learning methods against label noise can exacerbate the final ascent. This is a counterintuitive result, as these techniques are often used to improve learning on noisy data.

The authors validate their findings through extensive experiments on various neural network architectures and datasets, including ReLU networks on MNIST, ResNets/ViTs on CIFAR-10/100, and InceptionResNet-v2 on Stanford Cars with real-world noisy labels.

Critical Analysis

The authors provide a thorough theoretical and experimental analysis of the final ascent phenomenon in overparameterized neural networks under label noise. However, there are a few potential caveats and areas for further research:

1. The authors focus on synthetic label noise, but real-world noisy labels may have different statistical properties that could affect the final ascent behavior. Further investigation of various noise distributions and their impact would be valuable.

2. The theoretical analysis relies on certain simplifying assumptions, such as Gaussian noise and infinite data. Extending the analysis to more realistic settings could provide additional insights.

3. The counterintuitive finding that stronger regularization and robust training methods can exacerbate the final ascent warrants further exploration. It would be helpful to understand the precise mechanisms driving this behavior.

4. The authors only consider fully connected and convolutional networks. Investigating the final ascent phenomenon in other model architectures, such as transformers, could reveal additional insights.

5. The paper focuses on the test loss as the primary metric, but other measures of generalization, such as robustness to distribution shift or sample efficiency, may provide a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution by uncovering the final ascent phenomenon and providing a theoretical foundation for understanding it. However, further research is needed to fully explore the implications and limitations of these findings.

Conclusion

This paper uncovers an intriguing phenomenon where label noise in the training data leads to a "final ascent" in the typically observed double descent curve of overparameterized neural networks. The authors provide a thorough theoretical explanation for this behavior, attributing it to the shape transition of test loss variance induced by label noise.

Furthermore, the authors extend the final ascent phenomenon to model density, showing that reducing the number of active parameters can improve generalization under label noise. Surprisingly, they find that techniques often used to improve learning on noisy data, such as stronger regularization and robust training methods, can actually exacerbate the final ascent.

These findings have important implications for the design and training of large neural networks, particularly in real-world scenarios where noisy or imperfect data is common. The paper contributes valuable theoretical insights and opens up new avenues for further research on the complex interplay between network complexity, label noise, and generalization.