Analysis of Off-Policy Multi-Step TD-Learning with Linear Function Approximation

2402.15781

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/9/2024 by Donghwan Lee

🌐

Abstract

This paper analyzes multi-step TD-learning algorithms within the `deadly triad' scenario, characterized by linear function approximation, off-policy learning, and bootstrapping. In particular, we prove that n-step TD-learning algorithms converge to a solution as the sampling horizon n increases sufficiently. The paper is divided into two parts. In the first part, we comprehensively examine the fundamental properties of their model-based deterministic counterparts, including projected value iteration, gradient descent algorithms, and the control theoretic approach, which can be viewed as prototype deterministic algorithms whose analysis plays a pivotal role in understanding and developing their model-free reinforcement learning counterparts. In particular, we prove that these algorithms converge to meaningful solutions when n is sufficiently large. Based on these findings, two n-step TD-learning algorithms are proposed and analyzed, which can be seen as the model-free reinforcement learning counterparts of the gradient and control theoretic algorithms.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Examines the theoretical properties of off-policy multi-step temporal difference (TD) learning with linear function approximation
  • Provides convergence analysis and bounds on the estimation error for this class of reinforcement learning algorithms
  • Explores the impact of bootstrapping, the number of steps, and the behavior policy on the algorithm's performance

Plain English Explanation

This research paper analyzes a type of reinforcement learning algorithm called "off-policy multi-step TD learning with linear function approximation." Reinforcement learning is a way for AI systems to learn how to make good decisions by interacting with an environment and receiving rewards or punishments.

The key idea behind this algorithm is that it can learn from past experiences, even if those experiences were generated by a different decision-making policy than the one the algorithm is currently using. This is called "off-policy" learning, and it can be more efficient than only learning from your own actions.

The paper provides a mathematical analysis of how this algorithm behaves, looking at factors like how many steps it takes to update the value estimates, and how the behavior of the decision-making policy affects the learning process. The analysis shows that under certain conditions, the algorithm will converge to the correct value estimates, and provides bounds on how much the estimates can deviate from the true values.

Understanding the theoretical properties of this algorithm is important because it can help researchers and practitioners use it more effectively in real-world reinforcement learning problems, such as robotics, autonomous vehicles, and game AI.

Technical Explanation

The paper analyzes the convergence properties and estimation error bounds of off-policy multi-step temporal difference (TD) learning with linear function approximation. This class of reinforcement learning algorithms is of interest because it can learn from past experiences generated by a different policy than the one currently being used, which can lead to more efficient learning.

The key technical contributions of the paper are:

  1. Establishing the convergence of the off-policy multi-step TD learning algorithm under certain conditions, including the step-size schedule and the feature representation.
  2. Deriving an upper bound on the estimation error between the learned value function and the true value function, which depends on factors such as the number of steps, the behavior policy, and the quality of the linear function approximation.
  3. Analyzing the impact of the number of steps and the behavior policy on the algorithm's performance, providing guidance on how to choose these hyperparameters.

The analysis leverages tools from Markov chain theory, linear algebra, and optimization to rigorously characterize the algorithm's behavior. The results shed light on the trade-offs involved in choosing the number of steps and the behavior policy, which can inform the design of more effective reinforcement learning systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough theoretical analysis of off-policy multi-step TD learning with linear function approximation, which is an important class of reinforcement learning algorithms. The analysis is rigorous and the results offer valuable insights into the algorithm's convergence properties and estimation error bounds.

One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses solely on the theoretical analysis and does not include any empirical evaluation of the algorithm's performance on real-world problems. While the theoretical results are informative, it would be helpful to see how the algorithm performs in practice and whether the theoretical insights translate to improved performance in applications such as robotics, autonomous vehicles, or game AI.

Additionally, the analysis assumes a linear function approximation, which may not always be the best representation for complex reinforcement learning problems. It would be interesting to see if the insights from this paper can be extended to other function approximation methods, such as deep neural networks, and how the results might differ in those cases.

Overall, the paper provides a valuable contribution to the theoretical understanding of off-policy multi-step TD learning, and the insights may help researchers and practitioners design more effective reinforcement learning systems.

Conclusion

This research paper offers a detailed theoretical analysis of off-policy multi-step temporal difference (TD) learning with linear function approximation, a class of reinforcement learning algorithms. The analysis establishes convergence conditions and provides bounds on the estimation error, shedding light on the impact of factors such as the number of steps and the behavior policy.

The results of this study can inform the design of more effective reinforcement learning systems, with potential applications in robotics, autonomous vehicles, and game AI. While the theoretical insights are valuable, future research could explore the algorithm's performance in real-world scenarios and consider extending the analysis to other function approximation methods, such as deep neural networks.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

A Simple Finite-Time Analysis of TD Learning with Linear Function Approximation

Aritra Mitra

YC

0

Reddit

0

We study the finite-time convergence of TD learning with linear function approximation under Markovian sampling. Existing proofs for this setting either assume a projection step in the algorithm to simplify the analysis, or require a fairly intricate argument to ensure stability of the iterates. We ask: textit{Is it possible to retain the simplicity of a projection-based analysis without actually performing a projection step in the algorithm?} Our main contribution is to show this is possible via a novel two-step argument. In the first step, we use induction to prove that under a standard choice of a constant step-size $alpha$, the iterates generated by TD learning remain uniformly bounded in expectation. In the second step, we establish a recursion that mimics the steady-state dynamics of TD learning up to a bounded perturbation on the order of $O(alpha^2)$ that captures the effect of Markovian sampling. Combining these pieces leads to an overall approach that considerably simplifies existing proofs. We conjecture that our inductive proof technique will find applications in the analyses of more complex stochastic approximation algorithms, and conclude by providing some examples of such applications.

Read more

6/27/2024

📶

High-probability sample complexities for policy evaluation with linear function approximation

Gen Li, Weichen Wu, Yuejie Chi, Cong Ma, Alessandro Rinaldo, Yuting Wei

YC

0

Reddit

0

This paper is concerned with the problem of policy evaluation with linear function approximation in discounted infinite horizon Markov decision processes. We investigate the sample complexities required to guarantee a predefined estimation error of the best linear coefficients for two widely-used policy evaluation algorithms: the temporal difference (TD) learning algorithm and the two-timescale linear TD with gradient correction (TDC) algorithm. In both the on-policy setting, where observations are generated from the target policy, and the off-policy setting, where samples are drawn from a behavior policy potentially different from the target policy, we establish the first sample complexity bound with high-probability convergence guarantee that attains the optimal dependence on the tolerance level. We also exhihit an explicit dependence on problem-related quantities, and show in the on-policy setting that our upper bound matches the minimax lower bound on crucial problem parameters, including the choice of the feature maps and the problem dimension.

Read more

5/3/2024

Target Networks and Over-parameterization Stabilize Off-policy Bootstrapping with Function Approximation

Target Networks and Over-parameterization Stabilize Off-policy Bootstrapping with Function Approximation

Fengdi Che, Chenjun Xiao, Jincheng Mei, Bo Dai, Ramki Gummadi, Oscar A Ramirez, Christopher K Harris, A. Rupam Mahmood, Dale Schuurmans

YC

0

Reddit

0

We prove that the combination of a target network and over-parameterized linear function approximation establishes a weaker convergence condition for bootstrapped value estimation in certain cases, even with off-policy data. Our condition is naturally satisfied for expected updates over the entire state-action space or learning with a batch of complete trajectories from episodic Markov decision processes. Notably, using only a target network or an over-parameterized model does not provide such a convergence guarantee. Additionally, we extend our results to learning with truncated trajectories, showing that convergence is achievable for all tasks with minor modifications, akin to value truncation for the final states in trajectories. Our primary result focuses on temporal difference estimation for prediction, providing high-probability value estimation error bounds and empirical analysis on Baird's counterexample and a Four-room task. Furthermore, we explore the control setting, demonstrating that similar convergence conditions apply to Q-learning.

Read more

6/3/2024

🔍

Improved High-Probability Bounds for the Temporal Difference Learning Algorithm via Exponential Stability

Sergey Samsonov, Daniil Tiapkin, Alexey Naumov, Eric Moulines

YC

0

Reddit

0

In this paper we consider the problem of obtaining sharp bounds for the performance of temporal difference (TD) methods with linear function approximation for policy evaluation in discounted Markov decision processes. We show that a simple algorithm with a universal and instance-independent step size together with Polyak-Ruppert tail averaging is sufficient to obtain near-optimal variance and bias terms. We also provide the respective sample complexity bounds. Our proof technique is based on refined error bounds for linear stochastic approximation together with the novel stability result for the product of random matrices that arise from the TD-type recurrence.

Read more

6/18/2024