Incentive-compatible Bandits: Importance Weighting No More
2405.06480
0
0
š ļø
Abstract
We study the problem of incentive-compatible online learning with bandit feedback. In this class of problems, the experts are self-interested agents who might misrepresent their preferences with the goal of being selected most often. The goal is to devise algorithms which are simultaneously incentive-compatible, that is the experts are incentivised to report their true preferences, and have no regret with respect to the preferences of the best fixed expert in hindsight. citet{freeman2020no} propose an algorithm in the full information setting with optimal $O(sqrt{T log(K)})$ regret and $O(T^{2/3}(Klog(K))^{1/3})$ regret in the bandit setting. In this work we propose the first incentive-compatible algorithms that enjoy $O(sqrt{KT})$ regret bounds. We further demonstrate how simple loss-biasing allows the algorithm proposed in Freeman et al. 2020 to enjoy $tilde O(sqrt{KT})$ regret. As a byproduct of our approach we obtain the first bandit algorithm with nearly optimal regret bounds in the adversarial setting which works entirely on the observed loss sequence without the need for importance-weighted estimators. Finally, we provide an incentive-compatible algorithm that enjoys asymptotically optimal best-of-both-worlds regret guarantees, i.e., logarithmic regret in the stochastic regime as well as worst-case $O(sqrt{KT})$ regret.
Create account to get full access
Introduction
This paper addresses the challenge of designing incentive-compatible bandits, which are algorithms that can optimize decision-making in scenarios where the data being used is provided by self-interested agents. The authors propose a novel approach that eliminates the need for importance weighting, a common technique in previous work that can be computationally expensive and introduce additional complexities.
Problem setting and related work
Incentive-compatible Bandits: Importance Weighting No More
The key problem this paper tackles is how to design bandit algorithms that can effectively optimize decision-making when the data being used comes from self-interested agents who may have incentives to misreport their information. Previous approaches have relied on importance weighting, which can be computationally costly and introduce other challenges.
The authors build on prior work on exact truthfulness in online learning and doubly optimal no-regret online learning, as well as research showing that no-regret is not enough for incentive-compatibility in bandits and studies of adversarial combinatorial bandits with switching costs.
Plain English Explanation
The paper tackles the challenge of designing bandit algorithms - a type of machine learning model used to make decisions in uncertain environments - that can work well even when the data they use comes from self-interested agents who may have incentives to provide inaccurate information.
Previous approaches to this problem have relied on a technique called importance weighting, which can be computationally expensive and introduce additional complexities. The authors propose a new method that eliminates the need for importance weighting, potentially making the algorithms simpler and more efficient.
The authors build on several prior research efforts in related areas, such as work on truthfulness in online learning and no-regret online learning, as well as studies of how bandits behave in adversarial environments.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel approach to designing incentive-compatible bandits that does not require importance weighting. The authors build on previous work on exact truthfulness in online learning and doubly optimal no-regret online learning, as well as research showing that no-regret is not enough for incentive-compatibility in bandits and studies of adversarial combinatorial bandits with switching costs.
The key insight is that by carefully designing the algorithm's reward structure, it is possible to create incentives for agents to truthfully report their information, eliminating the need for computationally expensive importance weighting.
The authors provide theoretical analysis and empirical experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach compared to prior methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising new approach to incentive-compatible bandits, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The theoretical analysis relies on several assumptions, such as the agents having linear utility functions. It would be valuable to explore how the approach performs under more complex real-world scenarios.
-
The paper focuses on a specific bandit setting, and it's unclear how well the techniques would generalize to other types of bandit problems or machine learning tasks. Further research on non-truthful auctions and budgets may provide useful insights.
-
The empirical evaluation, while promising, is limited in scope. Larger-scale experiments across a wider range of benchmarks would help better assess the practical impact of the proposed methods.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the field of incentive-compatible machine learning, but there is still room for further exploration and refinement of the ideas.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to designing incentive-compatible bandits that eliminates the need for importance weighting, a computationally expensive technique used in previous work. By carefully structuring the algorithm's rewards, the authors are able to create incentives for agents to truthfully report their information, simplifying the overall design.
While the theoretical analysis and initial empirical results are promising, there are still some limitations and open questions that warrant further research. Exploring how the techniques perform in more complex real-world scenarios and assessing their generalizability to other machine learning tasks could yield valuable insights for the field.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the development of incentive-compatible machine learning algorithms, which have significant potential to improve decision-making in a wide range of applications where the data comes from self-interested agents.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š
On the price of exact truthfulness in incentive-compatible online learning with bandit feedback: A regret lower bound for WSU-UX
Ali Mortazavi, Junhao Lin, Nishant A. Mehta
0
0
In one view of the classical game of prediction with expert advice with binary outcomes, in each round, each expert maintains an adversarially chosen belief and honestly reports this belief. We consider a recently introduced, strategic variant of this problem with selfish (reputation-seeking) experts, where each expert strategically reports in order to maximize their expected future reputation based on their belief. In this work, our goal is to design an algorithm for the selfish experts problem that is incentive-compatible (IC, or emph{truthful}), meaning each expert's best strategy is to report truthfully, while also ensuring the algorithm enjoys sublinear regret with respect to the expert with the best belief. Freeman et al. (2020) recently studied this problem in the full information and bandit settings and obtained truthful, no-regret algorithms by leveraging prior work on wagering mechanisms. While their results under full information match the minimax rate for the classical (honest experts) problem, the best-known regret for their bandit algorithm WSU-UX is $O(T^{2/3})$, which does not match the minimax rate for the classical (honest bandits) setting. It was unclear whether the higher regret was an artifact of their analysis or a limitation of WSU-UX. We show, via explicit construction of loss sequences, that the algorithm suffers a worst-case $Omega(T^{2/3})$ lower bound. Left open is the possibility that a different IC algorithm obtains $O(sqrt{T})$ regret. Yet, WSU-UX was a natural choice for such an algorithm owing to the limited design room for IC algorithms in this setting.
4/9/2024
š·ļø
The Real Price of Bandit Information in Multiclass Classification
Liad Erez, Alon Cohen, Tomer Koren, Yishay Mansour, Shay Moran
0
0
We revisit the classical problem of multiclass classification with bandit feedback (Kakade, Shalev-Shwartz and Tewari, 2008), where each input classifies to one of $K$ possible labels and feedback is restricted to whether the predicted label is correct or not. Our primary inquiry is with regard to the dependency on the number of labels $K$, and whether $T$-step regret bounds in this setting can be improved beyond the $smash{sqrt{KT}}$ dependence exhibited by existing algorithms. Our main contribution is in showing that the minimax regret of bandit multiclass is in fact more nuanced, and is of the form $smash{widetilde{Theta}left(min left{|H| + sqrt{T}, sqrt{KT log |H|} right} right) }$, where $H$ is the underlying (finite) hypothesis class. In particular, we present a new bandit classification algorithm that guarantees regret $smash{widetilde{O}(|H|+sqrt{T})}$, improving over classical algorithms for moderately-sized hypothesis classes, and give a matching lower bound establishing tightness of the upper bounds (up to log-factors) in all parameter regimes.
6/21/2024
ā
Doubly Optimal No-Regret Online Learning in Strongly Monotone Games with Bandit Feedback
Wenjia Ba, Tianyi Lin, Jiawei Zhang, Zhengyuan Zhou
0
0
We consider online no-regret learning in unknown games with bandit feedback, where each player can only observe its reward at each time -- determined by all players' current joint action -- rather than its gradient. We focus on the class of textit{smooth and strongly monotone} games and study optimal no-regret learning therein. Leveraging self-concordant barrier functions, we first construct a new bandit learning algorithm and show that it achieves the single-agent optimal regret of $tilde{Theta}(nsqrt{T})$ under smooth and strongly concave reward functions ($n geq 1$ is the problem dimension). We then show that if each player applies this no-regret learning algorithm in strongly monotone games, the joint action converges in the textit{last iterate} to the unique Nash equilibrium at a rate of $tilde{Theta}(nT^{-1/2})$. Prior to our work, the best-known convergence rate in the same class of games is $tilde{O}(n^{2/3}T^{-1/3})$ (achieved by a different algorithm), thus leaving open the problem of optimal no-regret learning algorithms (since the known lower bound is $Omega(nT^{-1/2})$). Our results thus settle this open problem and contribute to the broad landscape of bandit game-theoretical learning by identifying the first doubly optimal bandit learning algorithm, in that it achieves (up to log factors) both optimal regret in the single-agent learning and optimal last-iterate convergence rate in the multi-agent learning. We also present preliminary numerical results on several application problems to demonstrate the efficacy of our algorithm in terms of iteration count.
4/1/2024
š·ļø
Beyond Primal-Dual Methods in Bandits with Stochastic and Adversarial Constraints
Martino Bernasconi, Matteo Castiglioni, Andrea Celli, Federico Fusco
0
0
We address a generalization of the bandit with knapsacks problem, where a learner aims to maximize rewards while satisfying an arbitrary set of long-term constraints. Our goal is to design best-of-both-worlds algorithms that perform optimally under both stochastic and adversarial constraints. Previous works address this problem via primal-dual methods, and require some stringent assumptions, namely the Slater's condition, and in adversarial settings, they either assume knowledge of a lower bound on the Slater's parameter, or impose strong requirements on the primal and dual regret minimizers such as requiring weak adaptivity. We propose an alternative and more natural approach based on optimistic estimations of the constraints. Surprisingly, we show that estimating the constraints with an UCB-like approach guarantees optimal performances. Our algorithm consists of two main components: (i) a regret minimizer working on emph{moving strategy sets} and (ii) an estimate of the feasible set as an optimistic weighted empirical mean of previous samples. The key challenge in this approach is designing adaptive weights that meet the different requirements for stochastic and adversarial constraints. Our algorithm is significantly simpler than previous approaches, and has a cleaner analysis. Moreover, ours is the first best-of-both-worlds algorithm providing bounds logarithmic in the number of constraints. Additionally, in stochastic settings, it provides $widetilde O(sqrt{T})$ regret emph{without} Slater's condition.
5/28/2024