How accurate are existing land cover maps for agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa?

Read original: arXiv:2307.02575 - Published 6/4/2024 by Hannah Kerner, Catherine Nakalembe, Adam Yang, Ivan Zvonkov, Ryan McWeeny, Gabriel Tseng, Inbal Becker-Reshef
Total Score

0

How accurate are existing land cover maps for agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa?

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Presents an unnormalized confusion matrix for various land cover mapping models
  • Compares the performance of these models on combined reference datasets
  • Provides insights into the strengths and weaknesses of different land cover mapping approaches

Plain English Explanation

The research paper shows how well different computer models perform at identifying and classifying various types of land cover, such as forests, crops, and urban areas, from satellite imagery. The researchers combined data from multiple reference datasets to create a comprehensive evaluation of the models' abilities.

The key findings are presented in the form of confusion matrices, which are visual tools that display the model's accuracy in correctly identifying each land cover type. These matrices reveal the strengths and limitations of the different modeling approaches, helping researchers and practitioners understand which techniques work best for particular land cover types or geographical regions.

Technical Explanation

The paper provides an in-depth analysis of the performance of various land cover mapping models using combined reference datasets. The researchers generated unnormalized confusion matrices to assess the models' abilities to accurately classify different land cover types.

The confusion matrices present the number of true positive, false positive, and false negative predictions made by each model for the various land cover classes. This information allows the researchers to identify the specific areas where the models excel or struggle, such as accurately detecting urban areas or distinguishing between different vegetation types.

By analyzing the patterns in the confusion matrices, the researchers can gain insights into the strengths and limitations of the different modeling approaches, as well as the potential sources of error or bias in the land cover classifications.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of land cover mapping models, but it does not delve into the potential causes of the observed performance differences. Further research could investigate the impact of factors such as image quality, training data diversity, and model complexity on the models' abilities to accurately classify land cover types.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the overall performance of the models but does not examine the potential regional biases or variations in accuracy across different geographical areas. Exploring these aspects could yield valuable insights for practitioners working in specific regions or environments.

Conclusion

This research presents a detailed comparison of the performance of various land cover mapping models using combined reference datasets. The unnormalized confusion matrices provide a clear and informative way to assess the strengths and limitations of these models, which can inform the development of more robust and accurate land cover classification systems. The insights gained from this study can contribute to the ongoing efforts to improve the monitoring and management of land resources at a global scale.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

How accurate are existing land cover maps for agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa?
Total Score

0

How accurate are existing land cover maps for agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa?

Hannah Kerner, Catherine Nakalembe, Adam Yang, Ivan Zvonkov, Ryan McWeeny, Gabriel Tseng, Inbal Becker-Reshef

Satellite Earth observations (EO) can provide affordable and timely information for assessing crop conditions and food production. Such monitoring systems are essential in Africa, where there is high food insecurity and sparse agricultural statistics. EO-based monitoring systems require accurate cropland maps to provide information about croplands, but there is a lack of data to determine which of the many available land cover maps most accurately identify cropland in African countries. This study provides a quantitative evaluation and intercomparison of 11 publicly available land cover maps to assess their suitability for cropland classification and EO-based agriculture monitoring in Africa using statistically rigorous reference datasets from 8 countries. We hope the results of this study will help users determine the most suitable map for their needs and encourage future work to focus on resolving inconsistencies between maps and improving accuracy in low-accuracy regions.

Read more

6/4/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Evaluation of Deep Learning Semantic Segmentation for Land Cover Mapping on Multispectral, Hyperspectral and High Spatial Aerial Imagery

Ilham Adi Panuntun, Ying-Nong Chen, Ilham Jamaluddin, Thi Linh Chi Tran

In the rise of climate change, land cover mapping has become such an urgent need in environmental monitoring. The accuracy of land cover classification has gotten increasingly based on the improvement of remote sensing data. Land cover classification using satellite imageries has been explored and become more prevalent in recent years, but the methodologies remain some drawbacks of subjective and time-consuming. Some deep learning techniques have been utilized to overcome these limitations. However, most studies implemented just one image type to evaluate algorithms for land cover mapping. Therefore, our study conducted deep learning semantic segmentation in multispectral, hyperspectral, and high spatial aerial image datasets for landcover mapping. This research implemented a semantic segmentation method such as Unet, Linknet, FPN, and PSPnet for categorizing vegetation, water, and others (i.e., soil and impervious surface). The LinkNet model obtained high accuracy in IoU (Intersection Over Union) at 0.92 in all datasets, which is comparable with other mentioned techniques. In evaluation with different image types, the multispectral images showed higher performance with the IoU, and F1-score are 0.993 and 0.997, respectively. Our outcome highlighted the efficiency and broad applicability of LinkNet and multispectral image on land cover classification. This research contributes to establishing an approach on landcover segmentation via open source for long-term future application.

Read more

7/2/2024

Generalized Few-Shot Meets Remote Sensing: Discovering Novel Classes in Land Cover Mapping via Hybrid Semantic Segmentation Framework
Total Score

0

Generalized Few-Shot Meets Remote Sensing: Discovering Novel Classes in Land Cover Mapping via Hybrid Semantic Segmentation Framework

Zhuohong Li, Fangxiao Lu, Jiaqi Zou, Lei Hu, Hongyan Zhang

Land-cover mapping is one of the vital applications in Earth observation, aiming at classifying each pixel's land-cover type of remote-sensing images. As natural and human activities change the landscape, the land-cover map needs to be rapidly updated. However, discovering newly appeared land-cover types in existing classification systems is still a non-trivial task hindered by various scales of complex land objects and insufficient labeled data over a wide-span geographic area. In this paper, we propose a generalized few-shot segmentation-based framework, named SegLand, to update novel classes in high-resolution land-cover mapping. Specifically, the proposed framework is designed in three parts: (a) Data pre-processing: the base training set and the few-shot support sets of novel classes are analyzed and augmented; (b) Hybrid segmentation structure; Multiple base learners and a modified Projection onto Orthogonal Prototypes (POP) network are combined to enhance the base-class recognition and to dig novel classes from insufficient labels data; (c) Ultimate fusion: the semantic segmentation results of the base learners and POP network are reasonably fused. The proposed framework has won first place in the leaderboard of the OpenEarthMap Land Cover Mapping Few-Shot Challenge. Experiments demonstrate the superiority of the framework for automatically updating novel land-cover classes with limited labeled data.

Read more

4/22/2024

BD-SAT: High-resolution Land Use Land Cover Dataset & Benchmark Results for Developing Division: Dhaka, BD
Total Score

0

BD-SAT: High-resolution Land Use Land Cover Dataset & Benchmark Results for Developing Division: Dhaka, BD

Ovi Paul, Abu Bakar Siddik Nayem, Anis Sarker, Amin Ahsan Ali, M Ashraful Amin, AKM Mahbubur Rahman

Land Use Land Cover (LULC) analysis on satellite images using deep learning-based methods is significantly helpful in understanding the geography, socio-economic conditions, poverty levels, and urban sprawl in developing countries. Recent works involve segmentation with LULC classes such as farmland, built-up areas, forests, meadows, water bodies, etc. Training deep learning methods on satellite images requires large sets of images annotated with LULC classes. However, annotated data for developing countries are scarce due to a lack of funding, absence of dedicated residential/industrial/economic zones, a large population, and diverse building materials. BD-SAT provides a high-resolution dataset that includes pixel-by-pixel LULC annotations for Dhaka metropolitan city and surrounding rural/urban areas. Using a strict and standardized procedure, the ground truth is created using Bing satellite imagery with a ground spatial distance of 2.22 meters per pixel. A three-stage, well-defined annotation process has been followed with support from GIS experts to ensure the reliability of the annotations. We performed several experiments to establish benchmark results. The results show that the annotated BD-SAT is sufficient to train large deep learning models with adequate accuracy for five major LULC classes: forest, farmland, built-up areas, water bodies, and meadows.

Read more

6/11/2024