How does Multi-Task Training Affect Transformer In-Context Capabilities? Investigations with Function Classes

2404.03558

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/5/2024 by Harmon Bhasin, Timothy Ossowski, Yiqiao Zhong, Junjie Hu
How does Multi-Task Training Affect Transformer In-Context Capabilities? Investigations with Function Classes

Abstract

Large language models (LLM) have recently shown the extraordinary ability to perform unseen tasks based on few-shot examples provided as text, also known as in-context learning (ICL). While recent works have attempted to understand the mechanisms driving ICL, few have explored training strategies that incentivize these models to generalize to multiple tasks. Multi-task learning (MTL) for generalist models is a promising direction that offers transfer learning potential, enabling large parameterized models to be trained from simpler, related tasks. In this work, we investigate the combination of MTL with ICL to build models that efficiently learn tasks while being robust to out-of-distribution examples. We propose several effective curriculum learning strategies that allow ICL models to achieve higher data efficiency and more stable convergence. Our experiments reveal that ICL models can effectively learn difficult tasks by training on progressively harder tasks while mixing in prior tasks, denoted as mixed curriculum in this work. Our code and models are available at https://github.com/harmonbhasin/curriculum_learning_icl .

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper investigates how multi-task training affects the in-context learning capabilities of transformer language models.
  • The researchers focus on function classes as a way to systematically study these capabilities, testing the models' ability to generalize to unseen functions.
  • The findings provide insights into the strengths and limitations of multi-task training for developing more capable and versatile language models.

Plain English Explanation

Transformers are a type of artificial intelligence model that have become very popular for language-related tasks. They are able to understand and generate human language by learning patterns from large datasets.

One interesting capability of transformers is their ability to learn new tasks "in-context" - that is, by providing just a few examples of the task, without needing to be retrained from scratch. This is a useful skill, as it allows transformers to be more flexible and adaptable.

The researchers in this paper wanted to explore how the in-context learning abilities of transformers are affected when the models are trained on multiple different tasks, rather than just a single task. The intuition is that exposing the model to a greater diversity of information and skills during training could make it more versatile and capable of learning new things quickly.

To investigate this, the researchers focused on testing the models' ability to learn different types of mathematical functions, like linear, quadratic, or exponential functions. By looking at how well the models could generalize to new functions they hadn't seen before, the researchers could get insights into the models' broader in-context learning abilities.

The findings suggest that multi-task training can indeed improve the models' in-context capabilities in some ways. However, there are also limitations and tradeoffs to consider. The results provide a nuanced picture of how transformer training approaches impact their versatility and adaptability.

Technical Explanation

The paper examines how multi-task training affects the in-context learning capabilities of large language models, using function classes as a testbed. The researchers trained transformer models on various combinations of tasks, including language modeling, arithmetic, and function regression. They then evaluated the models' ability to quickly learn to evaluate novel functions when provided with a few examples.

The experiments spanned different function classes, such as linear, polynomial, and exponential functions. The researchers found that multi-task training can improve in-context learning performance on some function classes, such as polynomials, relative to single-task training. However, they also observed limitations, where multi-task training resulted in worse performance on certain function classes, like exponentials.

The paper provides a detailed analysis of these results, exploring factors like the diversity of the training tasks, the complexity of the target functions, and the models' ability to learn task-relevant representations. The findings suggest that multi-task training can enhance certain in-context capabilities, but also highlight the need to carefully consider the interplay between the training tasks and the target domains.

The researchers also discuss the implications of their results for the development of more versatile and adaptable language models. They suggest that a nuanced approach to multi-task training, potentially incorporating task-specific architectures or meta-learning techniques, may be required to fully harness the benefits of this approach.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thorough investigation into the effects of multi-task training on transformer in-context learning capabilities. The researchers' focus on function classes as a testbed is a thoughtful and systematic approach, allowing for a controlled exploration of these abilities.

One potential limitation noted in the paper is the relatively small scale of the experiments, both in terms of the number of tasks and the size of the models. While the findings provide valuable insights, the researchers acknowledge that scaling up the scope of the study could yield additional insights.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential practical applications of these findings. While the researchers discuss the implications for developing more versatile language models, they could further explore how these results might translate to real-world scenarios and tasks.

Lastly, the paper could have engaged more with potential critiques or counterarguments to its findings. For example, it could have considered alternative perspectives on the merits and drawbacks of multi-task training, or explored potential confounding factors that were not accounted for in the experimental design.

Overall, the paper presents a well-executed and insightful study that contributes to our understanding of transformer in-context learning capabilities. The nuanced findings and thoughtful discussion provide a solid foundation for further research in this area.

Conclusion

This research paper offers a detailed investigation into how multi-task training affects the in-context learning capabilities of transformer language models. By focusing on function classes as a testbed, the researchers were able to systematically study the models' ability to generalize to unseen tasks.

The findings suggest that multi-task training can enhance certain in-context capabilities, such as the ability to learn polynomial functions. However, the researchers also observed limitations, where multi-task training resulted in poorer performance on other function classes, like exponential functions.

These results provide valuable insights into the strengths and tradeoffs of multi-task training for developing more versatile and adaptive language models. The nuanced picture presented in the paper underscores the need for a thoughtful and strategic approach to model training, considering the interplay between the training tasks and the target domains.

As the field of language AI continues to advance, studies like this one will be crucial for guiding the development of increasingly capable and adaptable systems. The insights gained here can inform future research and help shape the trajectory of transformer-based models, ultimately leading to more powerful and useful language technologies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

MLPs Learn In-Context

MLPs Learn In-Context

William L. Tong, Cengiz Pehlevan

YC

0

Reddit

0

In-context learning (ICL), the remarkable ability to solve a task from only input exemplars, has commonly been assumed to be a unique hallmark of Transformer models. In this study, we demonstrate that multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) can also learn in-context. Moreover, we find that MLPs, and the closely related MLP-Mixer models, learn in-context competitively with Transformers given the same compute budget. We further show that MLPs outperform Transformers on a subset of ICL tasks designed to test relational reasoning. These results suggest that in-context learning is not exclusive to Transformers and highlight the potential of exploring this phenomenon beyond attention-based architectures. In addition, MLPs' surprising success on relational tasks challenges prior assumptions about simple connectionist models. Altogether, our results endorse the broad trend that ``less inductive bias is better and contribute to the growing interest in all-MLP alternatives to task-specific architectures.

Read more

5/27/2024

📊

In-Context Learning through the Bayesian Prism

Madhur Panwar, Kabir Ahuja, Navin Goyal

YC

0

Reddit

0

In-context learning (ICL) is one of the surprising and useful features of large language models and subject of intense research. Recently, stylized meta-learning-like ICL setups have been devised that train transformers on sequences of input-output pairs $(x, f(x))$. The function $f$ comes from a function class and generalization is checked by evaluating on sequences generated from unseen functions from the same class. One of the main discoveries in this line of research has been that for several function classes, such as linear regression, transformers successfully generalize to new functions in the class. However, the inductive biases of these models resulting in this behavior are not clearly understood. A model with unlimited training data and compute is a Bayesian predictor: it learns the pretraining distribution. In this paper we empirically examine how far this Bayesian perspective can help us understand ICL. To this end, we generalize the previous meta-ICL setup to hierarchical meta-ICL setup which involve unions of multiple task families. We instantiate this setup on a diverse range of linear and nonlinear function families and find that transformers can do ICL in this setting as well. Where Bayesian inference is tractable, we find evidence that high-capacity transformers mimic the Bayesian predictor. The Bayesian perspective provides insights into the inductive bias of ICL and how transformers perform a particular task when they are trained on multiple tasks. We also find that transformers can learn to generalize to new function classes that were not seen during pretraining. This involves deviation from the Bayesian predictor. We examine these deviations in more depth offering new insights and hypotheses.

Read more

4/16/2024

Language Models can Exploit Cross-Task In-context Learning for Data-Scarce Novel Tasks

Language Models can Exploit Cross-Task In-context Learning for Data-Scarce Novel Tasks

Anwoy Chatterjee, Eshaan Tanwar, Subhabrata Dutta, Tanmoy Chakraborty

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed NLP with their remarkable In-context Learning (ICL) capabilities. Automated assistants based on LLMs are gaining popularity; however, adapting them to novel tasks is still challenging. While colossal models excel in zero-shot performance, their computational demands limit widespread use, and smaller language models struggle without context. This paper investigates whether LLMs can generalize from labeled examples of predefined tasks to novel tasks. Drawing inspiration from biological neurons and the mechanistic interpretation of the Transformer architecture, we explore the potential for information sharing across tasks. We design a cross-task prompting setup with three LLMs and show that LLMs achieve significant performance improvements despite no examples from the target task in the context. Cross-task prompting leads to a remarkable performance boost of 107% for LLaMA-2 7B, 18.6% for LLaMA-2 13B, and 3.2% for GPT 3.5 on average over zero-shot prompting, and performs comparable to standard in-context learning. The effectiveness of generating pseudo-labels for in-task examples is demonstrated, and our analyses reveal a strong correlation between the effect of cross-task examples and model activation similarities in source and target input tokens. This paper offers a first-of-its-kind exploration of LLMs' ability to solve novel tasks based on contextual signals from different task examples.

Read more

6/13/2024

📉

How Do Nonlinear Transformers Learn and Generalize in In-Context Learning?

Hongkang Li, Meng Wang, Songtao Lu, Xiaodong Cui, Pin-Yu Chen

YC

0

Reddit

0

Transformer-based large language models have displayed impressive in-context learning capabilities, where a pre-trained model can handle new tasks without fine-tuning by simply augmenting the query with some input-output examples from that task. Despite the empirical success, the mechanics of how to train a Transformer to achieve ICL and the corresponding ICL capacity is mostly elusive due to the technical challenges of analyzing the nonconvex training problems resulting from the nonlinear self-attention and nonlinear activation in Transformers. To the best of our knowledge, this paper provides the first theoretical analysis of the training dynamics of Transformers with nonlinear self-attention and nonlinear MLP, together with the ICL generalization capability of the resulting model. Focusing on a group of binary classification tasks, we train Transformers using data from a subset of these tasks and quantify the impact of various factors on the ICL generalization performance on the remaining unseen tasks with and without data distribution shifts. We also analyze how different components in the learned Transformers contribute to the ICL performance. Furthermore, we provide the first theoretical analysis of how model pruning affects ICL performance and prove that proper magnitude-based pruning can have a minimal impact on ICL while reducing inference costs. These theoretical findings are justified through numerical experiments.

Read more

6/18/2024