In-Context Learning through the Bayesian Prism
2306.04891
0
0
📊
Abstract
In-context learning (ICL) is one of the surprising and useful features of large language models and subject of intense research. Recently, stylized meta-learning-like ICL setups have been devised that train transformers on sequences of input-output pairs $(x, f(x))$. The function $f$ comes from a function class and generalization is checked by evaluating on sequences generated from unseen functions from the same class. One of the main discoveries in this line of research has been that for several function classes, such as linear regression, transformers successfully generalize to new functions in the class. However, the inductive biases of these models resulting in this behavior are not clearly understood. A model with unlimited training data and compute is a Bayesian predictor: it learns the pretraining distribution. In this paper we empirically examine how far this Bayesian perspective can help us understand ICL. To this end, we generalize the previous meta-ICL setup to hierarchical meta-ICL setup which involve unions of multiple task families. We instantiate this setup on a diverse range of linear and nonlinear function families and find that transformers can do ICL in this setting as well. Where Bayesian inference is tractable, we find evidence that high-capacity transformers mimic the Bayesian predictor. The Bayesian perspective provides insights into the inductive bias of ICL and how transformers perform a particular task when they are trained on multiple tasks. We also find that transformers can learn to generalize to new function classes that were not seen during pretraining. This involves deviation from the Bayesian predictor. We examine these deviations in more depth offering new insights and hypotheses.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines how large language models, like transformers, can learn new tasks through "in-context learning" (ICL) - a process of learning from a sequence of input-output examples provided during inference.
- The researchers explore the inductive biases and generalization capabilities of transformers in ICL settings, including cases where the model is trained on a diverse set of related tasks.
- They find that transformers can often mimic Bayesian predictors, which learn the underlying distribution of the training data, but can also exhibit behaviors that deviate from this Bayesian perspective.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models, like transformers, have a surprising ability to learn new tasks "on the fly" by observing just a few examples. This process, known as in-context learning (ICL), is the subject of intense research.
In this study, the researchers set up stylized ICL experiments, where the model is trained on a sequence of input-output pairs, with the goal of generalizing to new examples from the same underlying function or task. For example, the model might be trained on a series of linear regression problems, and then tested on its ability to solve new linear regression tasks it hasn't seen before.
The key finding is that transformers can often succeed at this type of ICL, even for complex non-linear functions. The researchers explore why this is the case, drawing insights from Bayesian statistics. They find that high-capacity transformers tend to mimic the behavior of an "ideal" Bayesian predictor, which learns the underlying distribution of the training data.
However, the researchers also identify cases where transformers deviate from this Bayesian perspective, exhibiting behaviors that cannot be fully explained by this theoretical framework. This suggests that transformers develop their own unique inductive biases through the ICL process, beyond what a traditional Bayesian model would learn.
Overall, this work provides new insights into the limitations and potential of ICL, and highlights the need for further research to fully understand the reasoning capabilities of these powerful language models.
Technical Explanation
The researchers set up a "hierarchical meta-ICL" experiment, where transformers are trained on sequences of input-output pairs drawn from a diverse set of related function classes, such as linear and non-linear regression problems. The goal is to evaluate the models' ability to generalize to new functions within and across these task families.
Where the Bayesian perspective is tractable, the authors find that high-capacity transformers closely approximate the behavior of an optimal Bayesian predictor, which learns the underlying distribution of the training data. This suggests that the inductive biases of transformers in ICL settings are closely aligned with Bayesian inference.
However, the researchers also identify cases where transformers exhibit behaviors that diverge from the Bayesian predictor. This includes the ability to generalize to new function classes that were not seen during pretraining. The authors examine these deviations in more depth, offering new hypotheses and insights.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough empirical investigation of transformer behavior in ICL settings, grounded in the Bayesian statistical framework. This offers valuable insights into the inductive biases and generalization capabilities of these models.
However, the authors acknowledge that the Bayesian perspective has limitations in fully explaining transformer behavior, particularly in cases where the models exhibit "non-Bayesian" generalization. More research is needed to fully understand the reasoning mechanisms underlying ICL in transformers.
Additionally, the paper focuses on a stylized experimental setup, which may not capture the full complexity of real-world ICL scenarios. Further work is needed to explore the robustness and practical implications of these findings.
Conclusion
This research offers important insights into the remarkable in-context learning abilities of large language models like transformers. By connecting these capabilities to Bayesian inference, the authors provide a valuable theoretical framework for understanding transformer inductive biases and generalization.
However, the work also highlights the need for continued investigation to fully unpack the reasoning mechanisms underlying ICL and assess the real-world implications of these findings. As transformers become increasingly ubiquitous, such research will be crucial for ensuring the responsible and ethical development of these powerful AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Towards Better Understanding of In-Context Learning Ability from In-Context Uncertainty Quantification
Shang Liu, Zhongze Cai, Guanting Chen, Xiaocheng Li
0
0
Predicting simple function classes has been widely used as a testbed for developing theory and understanding of the trained Transformer's in-context learning (ICL) ability. In this paper, we revisit the training of Transformers on linear regression tasks, and different from all the existing literature, we consider a bi-objective prediction task of predicting both the conditional expectation $mathbb{E}[Y|X]$ and the conditional variance Var$(Y|X)$. This additional uncertainty quantification objective provides a handle to (i) better design out-of-distribution experiments to distinguish ICL from in-weight learning (IWL) and (ii) make a better separation between the algorithms with and without using the prior information of the training distribution. Theoretically, we show that the trained Transformer reaches near Bayes-optimum, suggesting the usage of the information of the training distribution. Our method can be extended to other cases. Specifically, with the Transformer's context window $S$, we prove a generalization bound of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(sqrt{min{S, T}/(n T)})$ on $n$ tasks with sequences of length $T$, providing sharper analysis compared to previous results of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(sqrt{1/n})$. Empirically, we illustrate that while the trained Transformer behaves as the Bayes-optimal solution as a natural consequence of supervised training in distribution, it does not necessarily perform a Bayesian inference when facing task shifts, in contrast to the textit{equivalence} between these two proposed in many existing literature. We also demonstrate the trained Transformer's ICL ability over covariates shift and prompt-length shift and interpret them as a generalization over a meta distribution.
5/27/2024
🌀
In-context Learning Generalizes, But Not Always Robustly: The Case of Syntax
Aaron Mueller, Albert Webson, Jackson Petty, Tal Linzen
0
0
In-context learning (ICL) is now a common method for teaching large language models (LLMs) new tasks: given labeled examples in the input context, the LLM learns to perform the task without weight updates. Do models guided via ICL infer the underlying structure of the task defined by the context, or do they rely on superficial heuristics that only generalize to identically distributed examples? We address this question using transformations tasks and an NLI task that assess sensitivity to syntax - a requirement for robust language understanding. We further investigate whether out-of-distribution generalization can be improved via chain-of-thought prompting, where the model is provided with a sequence of intermediate computation steps that illustrate how the task ought to be performed. In experiments with models from the GPT, PaLM, and Llama 2 families, we find large variance across LMs. The variance is explained more by the composition of the pre-training corpus and supervision methods than by model size; in particular, models pre-trained on code generalize better, and benefit more from chain-of-thought prompting.
4/11/2024
How does Multi-Task Training Affect Transformer In-Context Capabilities? Investigations with Function Classes
Harmon Bhasin, Timothy Ossowski, Yiqiao Zhong, Junjie Hu
0
0
Large language models (LLM) have recently shown the extraordinary ability to perform unseen tasks based on few-shot examples provided as text, also known as in-context learning (ICL). While recent works have attempted to understand the mechanisms driving ICL, few have explored training strategies that incentivize these models to generalize to multiple tasks. Multi-task learning (MTL) for generalist models is a promising direction that offers transfer learning potential, enabling large parameterized models to be trained from simpler, related tasks. In this work, we investigate the combination of MTL with ICL to build models that efficiently learn tasks while being robust to out-of-distribution examples. We propose several effective curriculum learning strategies that allow ICL models to achieve higher data efficiency and more stable convergence. Our experiments reveal that ICL models can effectively learn difficult tasks by training on progressively harder tasks while mixing in prior tasks, denoted as mixed curriculum in this work. Our code and models are available at https://github.com/harmonbhasin/curriculum_learning_icl .
4/5/2024
📉
How Do Nonlinear Transformers Learn and Generalize in In-Context Learning?
Hongkang Li, Meng Wang, Songtao Lu, Xiaodong Cui, Pin-Yu Chen
0
0
Transformer-based large language models have displayed impressive in-context learning capabilities, where a pre-trained model can handle new tasks without fine-tuning by simply augmenting the query with some input-output examples from that task. Despite the empirical success, the mechanics of how to train a Transformer to achieve ICL and the corresponding ICL capacity is mostly elusive due to the technical challenges of analyzing the nonconvex training problems resulting from the nonlinear self-attention and nonlinear activation in Transformers. To the best of our knowledge, this paper provides the first theoretical analysis of the training dynamics of Transformers with nonlinear self-attention and nonlinear MLP, together with the ICL generalization capability of the resulting model. Focusing on a group of binary classification tasks, we train Transformers using data from a subset of these tasks and quantify the impact of various factors on the ICL generalization performance on the remaining unseen tasks with and without data distribution shifts. We also analyze how different components in the learned Transformers contribute to the ICL performance. Furthermore, we provide the first theoretical analysis of how model pruning affects ICL performance and prove that proper magnitude-based pruning can have a minimal impact on ICL while reducing inference costs. These theoretical findings are justified through numerical experiments.
6/18/2024