How to Engage Your Readers? Generating Guiding Questions to Promote Active Reading

Overview

• The paper introduces a dataset called GuidingQ, which contains 10,000 in-text questions from textbooks and scientific articles.
• The researchers analyze the dataset to understand the use, distribution, and linguistic characteristics of these questions.
• They explore approaches to generate such questions using language models and conduct a human study to understand the impact of these questions on reading comprehension.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on in-text questions, which are questions embedded within written text. These questions are believed to enhance readability and help readers better understand the content. However, the authors note that the reasons behind the effectiveness of these questions and their impact on human reading remain understudied.

To address this, the researchers created the GuidingQ dataset, which contains 10,000 in-text questions from textbooks and scientific articles. By analyzing this dataset, they gained a comprehensive understanding of how these questions are used, their distribution, and their linguistic characteristics.

The researchers then explored ways to generate similar questions using language models. This proved to be a challenging task, as the models needed to capture the relationships between questions and accurately identify where the questions should be positioned in the text.

Finally, the researchers conducted a human study to understand how these generated questions impact reading comprehension. They found that the generated questions were of high quality and were almost as effective as human-written questions in improving readers' memorization and comprehension.

Technical Explanation

The researchers introduced the GuidingQ dataset, which contains 10,000 in-text questions from textbooks and scientific articles. They analyzed this dataset to understand the use, distribution, and linguistic characteristics of these questions.

The researchers explored various approaches to generate such questions using language models. They found that capturing the relationships between questions and accurately identifying their position in the text were key challenges in this task.

To evaluate the impact of the generated questions, the researchers conducted a human study. They found that the generated questions were of high quality and were almost as effective as human-written questions in improving readers' memorization and comprehension.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of in-text questions and their potential impact on reading comprehension. However, the researchers acknowledge that their study is limited to a specific dataset and may not fully capture the diversity of in-text questions in various domains.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the cognitive mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of these questions. Further research is needed to understand the psychological and pedagogical implications of in-text questions and how they can be optimized for different learning contexts.

Conclusion

This paper provides valuable insights into the use and potential impact of in-text questions. The GuidingQ dataset and the researchers' exploration of question generation techniques offer a foundation for further research in this area.

The finding that generated questions can be almost as effective as human-written ones in improving reading comprehension suggests that automated question generation could be a valuable tool for enhancing educational materials and supporting learners.