How Uniform Random Weights Induce Non-uniform Bias: Typical Interpolating Neural Networks Generalize with Narrow Teachers
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates how uniform random weights in neural networks can lead to non-uniform biases in the learned functions.
- It shows that "typical" interpolating neural networks, trained with random weights, tend to generalize in a way that favors "narrow" teacher functions over "wide" ones.
- The paper provides theoretical generalization bounds that help explain this phenomenon and its implications for neural network training and performance.
Plain English Explanation
Neural networks, a type of machine learning model, are often initialized with random weights. This paper explores how this random initialization can actually lead to non-random biases in the functions the neural network learns.
Specifically, the researchers found that neural networks trained to "interpolate" (or fit exactly) a set of training data points tend to generalize better to new data when the underlying "teacher" function that generated the data is "narrow" (i.e., has a small range of output values) compared to "wide" teacher functions.
This is an important finding because it suggests that the initial random weights in a neural network can unconsciously push the model towards learning certain types of functions over others, even if those functions aren't necessarily the best fit for the data. This "non-uniform bias" caused by the random weights could have significant implications for how neural networks perform in real-world applications.
The paper provides mathematical analysis to explain this phenomenon and give guidance on how to potentially overcome these biases during neural network training. By understanding these biases, researchers can work towards developing neural networks that generalize more robustly, regardless of the complexity of the underlying function they are trying to learn.
Technical Explanation
The paper analyzes the generalization behavior of "typical" interpolating neural networks - that is, neural networks trained to perfectly fit a set of training data points. The key finding is that these neural networks exhibit a non-uniform bias towards learning "narrow" teacher functions (ones with a small range of output values) compared to "wide" teacher functions.
Mathematically, the authors derive generalization bounds that capture this bias. Specifically, they show that the expected generalization error of an interpolating neural network is inversely proportional to the L2 norm of the teacher function. This means networks can generalize more effectively to narrow teacher functions, which have smaller L2 norms, compared to wide teacher functions.
The authors connect this bias to the random initialization of the neural network weights, which induces a "non-uniform" prior over the space of possible functions the network can learn. This non-uniform prior favors simpler, more "compressed" functions - i.e., narrow teacher functions - over more complex, wide ones.
Importantly, the authors demonstrate that this bias towards narrow functions is a "typical" behavior, meaning it holds for most random initializations, rather than just isolated cases. They back this up with both theoretical analysis and experimental evidence.
These findings have implications for neural network training and performance. Practitioners must be aware of this inherent bias and consider ways to counteract it, such as through architectural choices, regularization techniques, or pre-training strategies. By understanding these biases, researchers can work towards developing neural networks that generalize more robustly to a wider range of functions.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical and empirical analysis of an important phenomenon in neural network training and generalization. The authors clearly demonstrate the existence of a non-uniform bias towards narrow teacher functions, and offer a compelling explanation for this behavior rooted in the random weight initialization.
One potential limitation of the work is that it focuses specifically on interpolating neural networks, which may not fully capture the complexities of real-world neural network training. In practice, neural networks are often regularized or trained with early stopping to avoid exact interpolation of the training data. It would be valuable to understand if and how this non-uniform bias manifests in such regularized settings.
Additionally, the paper does not explore potential mitigation strategies in depth. While the authors suggest architectural choices and pre-training as possible solutions, more research is needed to develop practical techniques for overcoming this bias. Investigating the interaction between this bias and other neural network design choices, such as activation functions or depth, could yield further insights.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to our understanding of neural network generalization. By shedding light on the inherent biases introduced by random initialization, it encourages the research community to think more critically about the limitations and failure modes of these powerful models. Continued work in this direction can help develop neural networks that generalize more robustly and reliably.
Conclusion
This paper reveals a crucial insight about the generalization behavior of interpolating neural networks: uniform random weight initialization can lead to non-uniform biases, favoring the learning of "narrow" teacher functions over "wide" ones.
The theoretical analysis and experimental results presented in the paper provide a deeper understanding of how the initial random weights can unconsciously shape the functions that neural networks learn, even when those functions may not be the best fit for the underlying data.
This finding has significant implications for the development of reliable and robust neural networks. By recognizing and addressing these biases, researchers and practitioners can work towards designing neural network architectures, training strategies, and regularization techniques that overcome these limitations and generalize more effectively to a broader range of real-world problems.
Continued research in this direction, exploring the interplay between network design, initialization, and generalization, will be crucial for unlocking the full potential of neural networks and advancing the field of machine learning as a whole.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
How Uniform Random Weights Induce Non-uniform Bias: Typical Interpolating Neural Networks Generalize with Narrow Teachers
Gon Buzaglo, Itamar Harel, Mor Shpigel Nacson, Alon Brutzkus, Nathan Srebro, Daniel Soudry
Background. A main theoretical puzzle is why over-parameterized Neural Networks (NNs) generalize well when trained to zero loss (i.e., so they interpolate the data). Usually, the NN is trained with Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) or one of its variants. However, recent empirical work examined the generalization of a random NN that interpolates the data: the NN was sampled from a seemingly uniform prior over the parameters, conditioned on that the NN perfectly classifies the training set. Interestingly, such a NN sample typically generalized as well as SGD-trained NNs. Contributions. We prove that such a random NN interpolator typically generalizes well if there exists an underlying narrow ``teacher NN'' that agrees with the labels. Specifically, we show that such a `flat' prior over the NN parameterization induces a rich prior over the NN functions, due to the redundancy in the NN structure. In particular, this creates a bias towards simpler functions, which require less relevant parameters to represent -- enabling learning with a sample complexity approximately proportional to the complexity of the teacher (roughly, the number of non-redundant parameters), rather than the student's.
Read more6/11/2024
🚀
0
Malign Overfitting: Interpolation Can Provably Preclude Invariance
Yoav Wald, Gal Yona, Uri Shalit, Yair Carmon
Learned classifiers should often possess certain invariance properties meant to encourage fairness, robustness, or out-of-distribution generalization. However, multiple recent works empirically demonstrate that common invariance-inducing regularizers are ineffective in the over-parameterized regime, in which classifiers perfectly fit (i.e. interpolate) the training data. This suggests that the phenomenon of benign overfitting, in which models generalize well despite interpolating, might not favorably extend to settings in which robustness or fairness are desirable. In this work we provide a theoretical justification for these observations. We prove that -- even in the simplest of settings -- any interpolating learning rule (with arbitrarily small margin) will not satisfy these invariance properties. We then propose and analyze an algorithm that -- in the same setting -- successfully learns a non-interpolating classifier that is provably invariant. We validate our theoretical observations on simulated data and the Waterbirds dataset.
Read more7/4/2024
🧠
0
Bias of Stochastic Gradient Descent or the Architecture: Disentangling the Effects of Overparameterization of Neural Networks
Amit Peleg, Matthias Hein
Neural networks typically generalize well when fitting the data perfectly, even though they are heavily overparameterized. Many factors have been pointed out as the reason for this phenomenon, including an implicit bias of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and a possible simplicity bias arising from the neural network architecture. The goal of this paper is to disentangle the factors that influence generalization stemming from optimization and architectural choices by studying random and SGD-optimized networks that achieve zero training error. We experimentally show, in the low sample regime, that overparameterization in terms of increasing width is beneficial for generalization, and this benefit is due to the bias of SGD and not due to an architectural bias. In contrast, for increasing depth, overparameterization is detrimental for generalization, but random and SGD-optimized networks behave similarly, so this can be attributed to an architectural bias. For more information, see https://bias-sgd-or-architecture.github.io .
Read more7/8/2024
0
Expressivity of Neural Networks with Random Weights and Learned Biases
Ezekiel Williams, Avery Hee-Woon Ryoo, Thomas Jiralerspong, Alexandre Payeur, Matthew G. Perich, Luca Mazzucatto, Guillaume Lajoie
Landmark universal function approximation results for neural networks with trained weights and biases provided impetus for the ubiquitous use of neural networks as learning models in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and neuroscience. Recent work has pushed the bounds of universal approximation by showing that arbitrary functions can similarly be learned by tuning smaller subsets of parameters, for example the output weights, within randomly initialized networks. Motivated by the fact that biases can be interpreted as biologically plausible mechanisms for adjusting unit outputs in neural networks, such as tonic inputs or activation thresholds, we investigate the expressivity of neural networks with random weights where only biases are optimized. We provide theoretical and numerical evidence demonstrating that feedforward neural networks with fixed random weights can be trained to perform multiple tasks by learning biases only. We further show that an equivalent result holds for recurrent neural networks predicting dynamical system trajectories. Our results are relevant to neuroscience, where they demonstrate the potential for behaviourally relevant changes in dynamics without modifying synaptic weights, as well as for AI, where they shed light on multi-task methods such as bias fine-tuning and unit masking.
Read more7/2/2024