Human Perception of LLM-generated Text Content in Social Media Environments
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines how humans perceive and respond to text content generated by large language models (LLMs) in social media environments
- Explores potential issues and challenges around the increasing use of LLM-generated content online
- Provides insights into the "uncanny valley" effect and how it influences user perceptions and trust
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates how people react to and perceive text content that was generated by powerful artificial intelligence (AI) language models, rather than being written by humans. This is an important topic as these AI language models are becoming more advanced and their generated text is increasingly difficult to distinguish from human-written content.
The researchers were interested in exploring the "uncanny valley" effect - the phenomenon where humanlike robots or computer-generated characters that are almost, but not perfectly, humanlike can elicit feelings of unease or revulsion in observers. They wanted to see if a similar effect occurs when people encounter text that appears to be written by a human, but was actually generated by an AI language model.
The study looked at how people responded to LLM-generated text in a social media-like context, in terms of their perceptions of the content's credibility, their emotional reactions, and their willingness to engage with it. The findings provide insights into the complex interplay between AI, human perception, and the spread of information online.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a series of experiments that examined human perceptions and reactions to LLM-generated text content in a simulated social media environment. The researchers used state-of-the-art LLMs to generate text posts on a variety of topics, which were then presented to human participants alongside control posts written by actual humans.
The participants were asked to evaluate the posts in terms of factors like credibility, emotional response, and willingness to engage or share the content. The researchers also collected data on the participants' background knowledge, personality traits, and other individual differences that might influence their perceptions.
Through statistical analysis of the survey responses, the study identified several key findings. For example, they found that people were generally able to distinguish LLM-generated text from human-written text, but that the "uncanny valley" effect did lead to more negative emotional reactions and lower perceived credibility for posts that were almost, but not perfectly, humanlike. The participants' individual characteristics, such as their tech-savviness and tendency toward anthropomorphism, also played a role in their responses.
The insights from this research have important implications for the design of AI-powered content generation and distribution systems, as well as for understanding how users may interact with and perceive increasingly sophisticated LLM-generated content in online environments.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a well-designed and rigorous empirical investigation of an important and timely topic. The researchers leveraged state-of-the-art LLM technology to generate realistic-looking social media posts, and their experiments were carefully structured to isolate the key factors influencing human perceptions.
One potential limitation of the study is its reliance on a simulated social media environment, which may not fully capture the complexity and dynamics of real-world online interactions. Additionally, the sample size, while adequate for the statistical analyses, could be expanded to increase the generalizability of the findings.
The paper also acknowledges that the "uncanny valley" phenomenon is a complex and multifaceted effect, and that further research is needed to fully understand its role in human-AI interactions. Additional work could explore how the uncanny valley effect may evolve as LLM technology continues to advance and become more seamlessly integrated into social media and other digital platforms.
Conclusion
This study provides valuable insights into how humans perceive and respond to LLM-generated text content in social media-like environments. The findings suggest that the "uncanny valley" effect can influence user trust and engagement, even as LLMs become increasingly sophisticated at generating humanlike text.
The implications of this research extend beyond social media, as LLM-powered content generation and AI-human interaction become more prevalent across a wide range of digital domains. Understanding these perceptual and psychological factors will be crucial for designing AI systems that can effectively and ethically communicate with human users.
Overall, this paper contributes important empirical evidence to the growing body of research on the societal impacts of large language models and other advanced AI technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Human Perception of LLM-generated Text Content in Social Media Environments
Kristina Radivojevic, Matthew Chou, Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Paul Brenner
Emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence (AI), and more specifically Large Language Models (LLMs) have provided malicious actors with powerful tools for manipulating digital discourse. LLMs have the potential to affect traditional forms of democratic engagements, such as voter choice, government surveys, or even online communication with regulators; since bots are capable of producing large quantities of credible text. To investigate the human perception of LLM-generated content, we recruited over 1,000 participants who then tried to differentiate bot from human posts in social media discussion threads. We found that humans perform poorly at identifying the true nature of user posts on social media. We also found patterns in how humans identify LLM-generated text content in social media discourse. Finally, we observed the Uncanny Valley effect in text dialogue in both user perception and identification. This indicates that despite humans being poor at the identification process, they can still sense discomfort when reading LLM-generated content.
Read more9/11/2024
0
Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?
Canyu Chen, Kai Shu
The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has made a transformative impact. However, the potential that LLMs such as ChatGPT can be exploited to generate misinformation has posed a serious concern to online safety and public trust. A fundamental research question is: will LLM-generated misinformation cause more harm than human-written misinformation? We propose to tackle this question from the perspective of detection difficulty. We first build a taxonomy of LLM-generated misinformation. Then we categorize and validate the potential real-world methods for generating misinformation with LLMs. Then, through extensive empirical investigation, we discover that LLM-generated misinformation can be harder to detect for humans and detectors compared to human-written misinformation with the same semantics, which suggests it can have more deceptive styles and potentially cause more harm. We also discuss the implications of our discovery on combating misinformation in the age of LLMs and the countermeasures.
Read more4/16/2024
🌀
0
Contrasting Linguistic Patterns in Human and LLM-Generated Text
Alberto Mu~noz-Ortiz, Carlos G'omez-Rodr'iguez, David Vilares
We conduct a quantitative analysis contrasting human-written English news text with comparable large language model (LLM) output from six different LLMs that cover three different families and four sizes in total. Our analysis spans several measurable linguistic dimensions, including morphological, syntactic, psychometric, and sociolinguistic aspects. The results reveal various measurable differences between human and AI-generated texts. Human texts exhibit more scattered sentence length distributions, more variety of vocabulary, a distinct use of dependency and constituent types, shorter constituents, and more optimized dependency distances. Humans tend to exhibit stronger negative emotions (such as fear and disgust) and less joy compared to text generated by LLMs, with the toxicity of these models increasing as their size grows. LLM outputs use more numbers, symbols and auxiliaries (suggesting objective language) than human texts, as well as more pronouns. The sexist bias prevalent in human text is also expressed by LLMs, and even magnified in all of them but one. Differences between LLMs and humans are larger than between LLMs.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Large Language Models can impersonate politicians and other public figures
Steffen Herbold, Alexander Trautsch, Zlata Kikteva, Annette Hautli-Janisz
Modern AI technology like Large language models (LLMs) has the potential to pollute the public information sphere with made-up content, which poses a significant threat to the cohesion of societies at large. A wide range of research has shown that LLMs are capable of generating text of impressive quality, including persuasive political speech, text with a pre-defined style, and role-specific content. But there is a crucial gap in the literature: We lack large-scale and systematic studies of how capable LLMs are in impersonating political and societal representatives and how the general public judges these impersonations in terms of authenticity, relevance and coherence. We present the results of a study based on a cross-section of British society that shows that LLMs are able to generate responses to debate questions that were part of a broadcast political debate programme in the UK. The impersonated responses are judged to be more authentic and relevant than the original responses given by people who were impersonated. This shows two things: (1) LLMs can be made to contribute meaningfully to the public political debate and (2) there is a dire need to inform the general public of the potential harm this can have on society.
Read more7/19/2024