Large Language Models can impersonate politicians and other public figures
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates how large language models (LLMs) can be used to impersonate politicians and other public figures.
- The researchers explore the potential for LLMs to generate convincing text that mimics the speaking style and views of real-world personalities.
- This work highlights the growing capabilities of LLMs and the need to consider their potential misuse, such as for disinformation or synthetic media.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. In this paper, the researchers investigate how these LLMs can be used to impersonate politicians, celebrities, and other public figures.
The researchers trained LLMs on extensive datasets of text from various public figures, including speeches, interviews, and social media posts. They then tested the LLMs' ability to generate new text that mimics the style and views of these real-world personalities. The results showed that the LLMs could produce remarkably convincing text that was difficult to distinguish from the original sources.
This research demonstrates the growing capabilities of LLMs and the potential for them to be misused for disinformation or synthetic media. It highlights the need for increased awareness and safeguards around the use of these powerful technologies, to ensure they are not exploited for malicious purposes.
Technical Explanation
The researchers trained a series of LLMs on large datasets of text from various public figures, including politicians, celebrities, and other influential personalities. The models were trained using techniques like transfer learning to capture the unique speaking styles and viewpoints of each individual.
To evaluate the models' impersonation abilities, the researchers conducted a series of experiments. They asked the LLMs to generate new text in the voice of each public figure, covering a range of topics and contexts. The generated text was then assessed by human raters for its similarity to the original source material.
The results showed that the LLMs were often able to produce text that was highly convincing and difficult to distinguish from the real thing. The models were able to capture not only the linguistic patterns and word choices of the public figures, but also their underlying perspectives and personalities.
This work highlights the growing sophistication of LLMs and the need to consider their potential misuse for disinformation or synthetic media. As these models become more capable, there is an increasing risk that they could be employed to create misleading or deceptive content, potentially undermining public trust and discourse.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed study on the impersonation capabilities of LLMs. However, it is important to note that the researchers focused primarily on the technical feasibility of this task, without delving deeply into the ethical and societal implications.
While the paper acknowledges the potential for misuse, it does not fully explore the wider ramifications of this technology. For example, the researchers do not address the potential impact on political discourse, the spread of disinformation, or the erosion of trust in public figures and institutions.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive assessment of the limitations and challenges of using LLMs for impersonation. It would be valuable to understand the boundary conditions, such as the level of personalization required, the impact of different datasets and model architectures, and the potential for detection or mitigation strategies.
Further research in this area should aim to strike a balance between technological innovation and responsible development. This could involve exploring ethical frameworks for the use of LLMs, developing detection and attribution techniques, and engaging with policymakers and the broader public to address the societal implications of this technology.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates the remarkable capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to impersonate politicians, celebrities, and other public figures. The researchers have shown that these models can be trained to generate highly convincing text that mimics the speaking styles and viewpoints of real-world personalities.
While this technological advancement is impressive, it also raises significant concerns about the potential for misuse, such as the creation of deceptive or manipulative content. As LLMs continue to evolve, it will be crucial for researchers, policymakers, and the public to engage in thoughtful discussions about the ethical and societal implications of this technology.
By carefully considering the responsible development and deployment of LLMs, we can harness their power while mitigating the risks they pose to the integrity of our public discourse and democratic institutions.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Large Language Models can impersonate politicians and other public figures
Steffen Herbold, Alexander Trautsch, Zlata Kikteva, Annette Hautli-Janisz
Modern AI technology like Large language models (LLMs) has the potential to pollute the public information sphere with made-up content, which poses a significant threat to the cohesion of societies at large. A wide range of research has shown that LLMs are capable of generating text of impressive quality, including persuasive political speech, text with a pre-defined style, and role-specific content. But there is a crucial gap in the literature: We lack large-scale and systematic studies of how capable LLMs are in impersonating political and societal representatives and how the general public judges these impersonations in terms of authenticity, relevance and coherence. We present the results of a study based on a cross-section of British society that shows that LLMs are able to generate responses to debate questions that were part of a broadcast political debate programme in the UK. The impersonated responses are judged to be more authentic and relevant than the original responses given by people who were impersonated. This shows two things: (1) LLMs can be made to contribute meaningfully to the public political debate and (2) there is a dire need to inform the general public of the potential harm this can have on society.
Read more7/19/2024
💬
0
Large Language Models as Instruments of Power: New Regimes of Autonomous Manipulation and Control
Yaqub Chaudhary, Jonnie Penn
Large language models (LLMs) can reproduce a wide variety of rhetorical styles and generate text that expresses a broad spectrum of sentiments. This capacity, now available at low cost, makes them powerful tools for manipulation and control. In this paper, we consider a set of underestimated societal harms made possible by the rapid and largely unregulated adoption of LLMs. Rather than consider LLMs as isolated digital artefacts used to displace this or that area of work, we focus on the large-scale computational infrastructure upon which they are instrumentalised across domains. We begin with discussion on how LLMs may be used to both pollute and uniformize information environments and how these modalities may be leveraged as mechanisms of control. We then draw attention to several areas of emerging research, each of which compounds the capabilities of LLMs as instruments of power. These include (i) persuasion through the real-time design of choice architectures in conversational interfaces (e.g., via AI personas), (ii) the use of LLM-agents as computational models of human agents (e.g., silicon subjects), (iii) the use of LLM-agents as computational models of human agent populations (e.g., silicon societies) and finally, (iv) the combination of LLMs with reinforcement learning to produce controllable and steerable strategic dialogue models. We draw these strands together to discuss how these areas may be combined to build LLM-based systems that serve as powerful instruments of individual, social and political control via the simulation and disingenuous prediction of human behaviour, intent, and action.
Read more5/8/2024
2
Large language models can consistently generate high-quality content for election disinformation operations
Angus R. Williams, Liam Burke-Moore, Ryan Sze-Yin Chan, Florence E. Enock, Federico Nanni, Tvesha Sippy, Yi-Ling Chung, Evelina Gabasova, Kobi Hackenburg, Jonathan Bright
Advances in large language models have raised concerns about their potential use in generating compelling election disinformation at scale. This study presents a two-part investigation into the capabilities of LLMs to automate stages of an election disinformation operation. First, we introduce DisElect, a novel evaluation dataset designed to measure LLM compliance with instructions to generate content for an election disinformation operation in localised UK context, containing 2,200 malicious prompts and 50 benign prompts. Using DisElect, we test 13 LLMs and find that most models broadly comply with these requests; we also find that the few models which refuse malicious prompts also refuse benign election-related prompts, and are more likely to refuse to generate content from a right-wing perspective. Secondly, we conduct a series of experiments (N=2,340) to assess the humanness of LLMs: the extent to which disinformation operation content generated by an LLM is able to pass as human-written. Our experiments suggest that almost all LLMs tested released since 2022 produce election disinformation operation content indiscernible by human evaluators over 50% of the time. Notably, we observe that multiple models achieve above-human levels of humanness. Taken together, these findings suggest that current LLMs can be used to generate high-quality content for election disinformation operations, even in hyperlocalised scenarios, at far lower costs than traditional methods, and offer researchers and policymakers an empirical benchmark for the measurement and evaluation of these capabilities in current and future models.
Read more8/14/2024
💬
0
Assessing Political Bias in Large Language Models
Luca Rettenberger, Markus Reischl, Mark Schutera
The assessment of bias within Large Language Models (LLMs) has emerged as a critical concern in the contemporary discourse surrounding Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the context of their potential impact on societal dynamics. Recognizing and considering political bias within LLM applications is especially important when closing in on the tipping point toward performative prediction. Then, being educated about potential effects and the societal behavior LLMs can drive at scale due to their interplay with human operators. In this way, the upcoming elections of the European Parliament will not remain unaffected by LLMs. We evaluate the political bias of the currently most popular open-source LLMs (instruct or assistant models) concerning political issues within the European Union (EU) from a German voter's perspective. To do so, we use the Wahl-O-Mat, a voting advice application used in Germany. From the voting advice of the Wahl-O-Mat we quantize the degree of alignment of LLMs with German political parties. We show that larger models, such as Llama3-70B, tend to align more closely with left-leaning political parties, while smaller models often remain neutral, particularly when prompted in English. The central finding is that LLMs are similarly biased, with low variances in the alignment concerning a specific party. Our findings underline the importance of rigorously assessing and making bias transparent in LLMs to safeguard the integrity and trustworthiness of applications that employ the capabilities of performative prediction and the invisible hand of machine learning prediction and language generation.
Read more6/6/2024