ICSVR: Investigating Compositional and Syntactic Understanding in Video Retrieval Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper investigates the compositional and semantic understanding of video retrieval models.
• The researchers propose a model called ICSVR (Investigating Compositional and Semantic understanding in Video Retrieval) to study how well these models capture the compositional and semantic aspects of video-text associations.
• The ICSVR model is evaluated on various video retrieval tasks, including retrieving the ground truth video from a text caption and vice versa.
Plain English Explanation
Video retrieval is the process of finding the correct video in a database given a text description, or finding the right text description for a given video. This is an important task in many applications, such as video search engines and video-based question answering systems.
The key idea behind this research is to investigate how well video retrieval models understand the compositional and semantic aspects of the video-text relationship. Compositional understanding means the model can break down the video and text into their underlying components and understand how they relate to each other. Semantic understanding refers to the model's ability to grasp the meaning and context of the video-text association.
To study this, the researchers developed a model called ICSVR, which stands for "Investigating Compositional and Semantic understanding in Video Retrieval." They evaluated this model on various video retrieval tasks, such as finding the correct video given a text caption, and vice versa. By analyzing the performance of ICSVR, the researchers aimed to gain insights into the strengths and limitations of current video retrieval models in terms of their compositional and semantic understanding.
Technical Explanation
The ICSVR model is designed to investigate the compositional and semantic understanding of video retrieval models. The researchers used a transformer-based architecture that takes in both video and text inputs and learns to associate them through multi-modal attention mechanisms.
To assess the model's compositional and semantic understanding, the researchers designed several specialized tasks and datasets. For example, they created "compositional probes" that evaluate the model's ability to understand how different parts of the video and text relate to each other. They also developed "semantic probes" that test the model's grasp of the overall meaning and context of the video-text association.
The ICSVR model was evaluated on standard video retrieval benchmarks, as well as the specialized probes. The results showed that while the model performed well on the retrieval tasks, it had some limitations in its compositional and semantic understanding. The researchers identified specific areas where the model struggled, such as understanding the temporal and causal relationships between video and text.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that the ICSVR model is not the first to investigate the compositional and semantic aspects of video retrieval. Other papers, such as ShE-Net and COVR, have also explored these issues. However, the ICSVR model provides a more systematic and comprehensive approach to understanding the strengths and limitations of current video retrieval models in these areas.
One potential limitation of the ICSVR model is that it may not capture all the nuances of compositional and semantic understanding. The specialized probes designed by the researchers, while valuable, may not fully reflect the complexities of real-world video retrieval scenarios. Additionally, the model's performance on the probes may not directly translate to its effectiveness in practical applications.
Further research could explore ways to improve the ICSVR model's compositional and semantic understanding, potentially by incorporating techniques from other related papers or exploring new architectural designs. Ultimately, the insights gained from this work can help advance the field of video retrieval and contribute to the development of more robust and interpretable multi-modal models.
Conclusion
This paper presents the ICSVR model, which aims to investigate the compositional and semantic understanding of video retrieval models. The researchers designed specialized tasks and datasets to assess these aspects of model performance, and their findings suggest that current video retrieval models have some limitations in these areas.
The insights from this work can inform the development of more advanced video retrieval systems that better capture the nuances of video-text associations. By improving the compositional and semantic understanding of these models, researchers can create systems that are more effective, interpretable, and aligned with human-level understanding of multimedia content.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
ICSVR: Investigating Compositional and Syntactic Understanding in Video Retrieval Models
Avinash Madasu, Vasudev Lal
Video retrieval (VR) involves retrieving the ground truth video from the video database given a text caption or vice-versa. The two important components of compositionality: objects & attributes and actions are joined using correct syntax to form a proper text query. These components (objects & attributes, actions and syntax) each play an important role to help distinguish among videos and retrieve the correct ground truth video. However, it is unclear what is the effect of these components on the video retrieval performance. We therefore, conduct a systematic study to evaluate the compositional and syntactic understanding of video retrieval models on standard benchmarks such as MSRVTT, MSVD and DIDEMO. The study is performed on two categories of video retrieval models: (i) which are pre-trained on video-text pairs and fine-tuned on downstream video retrieval datasets (Eg. Frozen-in-Time, Violet, MCQ etc.) (ii) which adapt pre-trained image-text representations like CLIP for video retrieval (Eg. CLIP4Clip, XCLIP, CLIP2Video etc.). Our experiments reveal that actions and syntax play a minor role compared to objects & attributes in video understanding. Moreover, video retrieval models that use pre-trained image-text representations (CLIP) have better syntactic and compositional understanding as compared to models pre-trained on video-text data. The code is available at https://github.com/IntelLabs/multimodal_cognitive_ai/tree/main/ICSVR
Read more6/12/2024
0
Exploring the Spectrum of Visio-Linguistic Compositionality and Recognition
Youngtaek Oh, Pyunghwan Ahn, Jinhyung Kim, Gwangmo Song, Soonyoung Lee, In So Kweon, Junmo Kim
Vision and language models (VLMs) such as CLIP have showcased remarkable zero-shot recognition abilities yet face challenges in visio-linguistic compositionality, particularly in linguistic comprehension and fine-grained image-text alignment. This paper explores the intricate relationship between compositionality and recognition -- two pivotal aspects of VLM capability. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of existing VLMs, covering both pre-training approaches aimed at recognition and the fine-tuning methods designed to improve compositionality. Our evaluation employs 12 benchmarks for compositionality, along with 21 zero-shot classification and two retrieval benchmarks for recognition. In our analysis from 274 CLIP model checkpoints, we reveal patterns and trade-offs that emerge between compositional understanding and recognition accuracy. Ultimately, this necessitates strategic efforts towards developing models that improve both capabilities, as well as the meticulous formulation of benchmarks for compositionality. We open our evaluation framework at https://github.com/ytaek-oh/vl_compo.
Read more6/14/2024
0
Contrasting Intra-Modal and Ranking Cross-Modal Hard Negatives to Enhance Visio-Linguistic Compositional Understanding
Le Zhang, Rabiul Awal, Aishwarya Agrawal
Vision-Language Models (VLMs), such as CLIP, exhibit strong image-text comprehension abilities, facilitating advances in several downstream tasks such as zero-shot image classification, image-text retrieval, and text-to-image generation. However, the compositional reasoning abilities of existing VLMs remains subpar. The root of this limitation lies in the inadequate alignment between the images and captions in the pretraining datasets. Additionally, the current contrastive learning objective fails to focus on fine-grained grounding components like relations, actions, and attributes, resulting in bag-of-words representations. We introduce a simple and effective method to improve compositional reasoning in VLMs. Our method better leverages available datasets by refining and expanding the standard image-text contrastive learning framework. Our approach does not require specific annotations and does not incur extra parameters. When integrated with CLIP, our technique yields notable improvement over state-of-the-art baselines across five vision-language compositional benchmarks. We open-source our code at https://github.com/lezhang7/Enhance-FineGrained.
Read more4/26/2024
🖼️
0
Does CLIP Bind Concepts? Probing Compositionality in Large Image Models
Martha Lewis, Nihal V. Nayak, Peilin Yu, Qinan Yu, Jack Merullo, Stephen H. Bach, Ellie Pavlick
Large-scale neural network models combining text and images have made incredible progress in recent years. However, it remains an open question to what extent such models encode compositional representations of the concepts over which they operate, such as correctly identifying red cube by reasoning over the constituents red and cube. In this work, we focus on the ability of a large pretrained vision and language model (CLIP) to encode compositional concepts and to bind variables in a structure-sensitive way (e.g., differentiating cube behind sphere from sphere behind cube). To inspect the performance of CLIP, we compare several architectures from research on compositional distributional semantics models (CDSMs), a line of research that attempts to implement traditional compositional linguistic structures within embedding spaces. We benchmark them on three synthetic datasets - single-object, two-object, and relational - designed to test concept binding. We find that CLIP can compose concepts in a single-object setting, but in situations where concept binding is needed, performance drops dramatically. At the same time, CDSMs also perform poorly, with best performance at chance level.
Read more9/2/2024