When to Sense and Control? A Time-adaptive Approach for Continuous-Time RL
2406.01163
0
0
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) excels in optimizing policies for discrete-time Markov decision processes (MDP). However, various systems are inherently continuous in time, making discrete-time MDPs an inexact modeling choice. In many applications, such as greenhouse control or medical treatments, each interaction (measurement or switching of action) involves manual intervention and thus is inherently costly. Therefore, we generally prefer a time-adaptive approach with fewer interactions with the system. In this work, we formalize an RL framework, Time-adaptive Control & Sensing (TaCoS), that tackles this challenge by optimizing over policies that besides control predict the duration of its application. Our formulation results in an extended MDP that any standard RL algorithm can solve. We demonstrate that state-of-the-art RL algorithms trained on TaCoS drastically reduce the interaction amount over their discrete-time counterpart while retaining the same or improved performance, and exhibiting robustness over discretization frequency. Finally, we propose OTaCoS, an efficient model-based algorithm for our setting. We show that OTaCoS enjoys sublinear regret for systems with sufficiently smooth dynamics and empirically results in further sample-efficiency gains.
Create account to get full access
Overview
This paper proposes a time-adaptive approach for continuous-time reinforcement learning (RL) tasks. The key idea is to dynamically adjust the sensing and control intervals based on the current state of the system, rather than using fixed intervals. This can lead to more efficient learning and control by focusing sensing and control efforts on the most critical time periods.
Plain English Explanation
Imagine you're learning to play a video game with a continuous world, like a driving game. In a typical RL setup, the game would be divided into fixed time steps, and your agent would need to sense the environment and decide on an action at each step.
However, this Growing Q-Networks: Solving Continuous Control Tasks paper suggests a smarter approach. Instead of fixed time steps, the agent can dynamically adjust when it senses the environment and takes actions. For example, when the car is driving on a straight road, the agent may only need to check the environment and update the controls every second. But when the car is approaching a sharp turn, the agent may need to sense and control more frequently, like 10 times per second.
This Dynamic Observation Policies for Observation-Cost-Sensitive Reinforcement learning approach allows the agent to focus its limited sensing and control resources on the most important moments, leading to more efficient and effective learning and control.
Technical Explanation
The paper formulates the continuous-time RL problem as a partially observed Markov decision process (POMDP), where the agent must decide both when to sense the environment and when to apply control actions.
The authors propose a time-adaptive framework that learns a policy to dynamically adjust the sensing and control intervals based on the current state of the system. This is achieved by training a neural network that takes the current state as input and outputs the optimal sensing and control intervals.
The effectiveness of this approach is demonstrated through experiments on various continuous control tasks, including inverted pendulum balancing and quadrotor flight. The results show that the time-adaptive method outperforms fixed-interval baselines in terms of sample efficiency and final performance.
Critical Analysis
The key strength of this approach is its flexibility and ability to focus sensing and control efforts on the most critical moments. This can lead to significant improvements in sample efficiency, an important consideration for real-world applications with limited data.
However, the paper does not extensively explore the potential downsides or limitations of this time-adaptive approach. For example, the computational overhead of continuously adjusting the sensing and control intervals is not discussed. Additionally, the paper does not address how this method might scale to more complex, high-dimensional systems or environments with stochastic dynamics.
Further research could investigate the robustness of this approach to model misspecification, the impact of hyperparameter choices, and potential extensions to Time-Varying Constraint-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Energy-Efficient Buildings or Adaptive Online Non-Stochastic Control settings.
Conclusion
This paper presents a promising approach for continuous-time reinforcement learning that dynamically adjusts the sensing and control intervals based on the current state of the system. By focusing computational resources on the most critical moments, the time-adaptive method can lead to more efficient and effective learning and control, as demonstrated through experiments on various continuous control tasks.
While the paper does not explore all potential limitations or extensions of this approach, it provides a valuable contribution to the field of reinforcement learning by introducing a flexible and adaptive framework that could have significant practical applications, especially in domains like MOSEAC: Streamlined Variable Time-Step Reinforcement Learning where sample efficiency is a key concern.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Time-Constrained Robust MDPs
Adil Zouitine, David Bertoin, Pierre Clavier, Matthieu Geist, Emmanuel Rachelson
0
0
Robust reinforcement learning is essential for deploying reinforcement learning algorithms in real-world scenarios where environmental uncertainty predominates. Traditional robust reinforcement learning often depends on rectangularity assumptions, where adverse probability measures of outcome states are assumed to be independent across different states and actions. This assumption, rarely fulfilled in practice, leads to overly conservative policies. To address this problem, we introduce a new time-constrained robust MDP (TC-RMDP) formulation that considers multifactorial, correlated, and time-dependent disturbances, thus more accurately reflecting real-world dynamics. This formulation goes beyond the conventional rectangularity paradigm, offering new perspectives and expanding the analytical framework for robust RL. We propose three distinct algorithms, each using varying levels of environmental information, and evaluate them extensively on continuous control benchmarks. Our results demonstrate that these algorithms yield an efficient tradeoff between performance and robustness, outperforming traditional deep robust RL methods in time-constrained environments while preserving robustness in classical benchmarks. This study revisits the prevailing assumptions in robust RL and opens new avenues for developing more practical and realistic RL applications.
6/13/2024
Adaptive Actor-Critic Based Optimal Regulation for Drift-Free Uncertain Nonlinear Systems
Ashwin P. Dani, Shubhendu Bhasin
0
0
In this paper, a continuous-time adaptive actor-critic reinforcement learning (RL) controller is developed for drift-free nonlinear systems. Practical examples of such systems are image-based visual servoing (IBVS) and wheeled mobile robots (WMR), where the system dynamics includes a parametric uncertainty in the control effectiveness matrix with no drift term. The uncertainty in the input term poses a challenge for developing a continuous-time RL controller using existing methods. In this paper, an actor-critic or synchronous policy iteration (PI)-based RL controller is presented with a concurrent learning (CL)-based parameter update law for estimating the unknown parameters of the control effectiveness matrix. An infinite-horizon value function minimization objective is achieved by regulating the current states to the desired with near-optimal control efforts. The proposed controller guarantees closed-loop stability and simulation results validate the proposed theory using IBVS and WMR examples.
6/14/2024
Growing Q-Networks: Solving Continuous Control Tasks with Adaptive Control Resolution
Tim Seyde, Peter Werner, Wilko Schwarting, Markus Wulfmeier, Daniela Rus
0
0
Recent reinforcement learning approaches have shown surprisingly strong capabilities of bang-bang policies for solving continuous control benchmarks. The underlying coarse action space discretizations often yield favourable exploration characteristics while final performance does not visibly suffer in the absence of action penalization in line with optimal control theory. In robotics applications, smooth control signals are commonly preferred to reduce system wear and energy efficiency, but action costs can be detrimental to exploration during early training. In this work, we aim to bridge this performance gap by growing discrete action spaces from coarse to fine control resolution, taking advantage of recent results in decoupled Q-learning to scale our approach to high-dimensional action spaces up to dim(A) = 38. Our work indicates that an adaptive control resolution in combination with value decomposition yields simple critic-only algorithms that yield surprisingly strong performance on continuous control tasks.
4/8/2024
An Idiosyncrasy of Time-discretization in Reinforcement Learning
Kris De Asis, Richard S. Sutton
0
0
Many reinforcement learning algorithms are built on an assumption that an agent interacts with an environment over fixed-duration, discrete time steps. However, physical systems are continuous in time, requiring a choice of time-discretization granularity when digitally controlling them. Furthermore, such systems do not wait for decisions to be made before advancing the environment state, necessitating the study of how the choice of discretization may affect a reinforcement learning algorithm. In this work, we consider the relationship between the definitions of the continuous-time and discrete-time returns. Specifically, we acknowledge an idiosyncrasy with naively applying a discrete-time algorithm to a discretized continuous-time environment, and note how a simple modification can better align the return definitions. This observation is of practical consideration when dealing with environments where time-discretization granularity is a choice, or situations where such granularity is inherently stochastic.
6/24/2024