Imitating Language via Scalable Inverse Reinforcement Learning
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores a scalable approach to inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) for imitating language.
- IRL aims to recover the reward function that describes an expert's behavior, which can then be used to train an agent to mimic the expert.
- The authors propose a novel IRL algorithm that is more efficient and scalable than previous methods.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a technique called inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) to help AI systems learn to communicate like humans. IRL is a way for AI to figure out the "reward function" that an expert (in this case, a human) is optimizing for when they take certain actions or say certain things.
By understanding this reward function, the AI can then learn to mimic the expert's behavior. However, traditional IRL methods can be computationally expensive and difficult to scale to complex language tasks.
The key innovation in this paper is a new IRL algorithm that is more efficient and scalable. This allows the AI system to learn complex language patterns by observing expert behavior, without needing massive amounts of training data or compute power.
The algorithm works by efficiently "reverse engineering" the reward function that the expert is optimizing for, based on observations of their language use. The AI can then use this learned reward function to generate its own language that mimics the expert, in a way that feels natural and coherent.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel Scalable Inverse Reinforcement Learning (SIRL) algorithm for imitating language. Traditional IRL methods can be computationally expensive and struggle to scale to complex language tasks.
SIRL addresses these limitations by using a more efficient reward learning approach. It models the expert's reward function as a linear combination of hand-crafted features, and learns the weights of this linear model using a scalable optimization procedure.
The key technical innovations are:
- Using a Softmax parameterization to ensure the reward function is well-behaved.
- Applying Bayesian optimization to efficiently search the feature weight space.
- Leveraging reinforcement learning techniques to train the final policy.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of SIRL on both synthetic and real-world language tasks, showing that it can accurately recover expert rewards and generate highly realistic language samples.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for scalable inverse reinforcement learning to imitate language. However, some potential limitations and areas for further research are:
- The hand-crafted feature representation may not be flexible enough to capture all the nuances of human language. More expressive function approximators could be explored.
- The paper focuses on imitating expert behaviors, but does not address the issue of value alignment - ensuring the learned behavior is actually beneficial.
- Evaluating the generalization capabilities of the learned policies, beyond just the training distribution, would be an important next step.
- The paper does not discuss potential negative societal impacts of highly realistic language generation, such as the spread of misinformation.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of inverse reinforcement learning, but further research is needed to fully realize the potential of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper presents a scalable inverse reinforcement learning algorithm for imitating human language. By efficiently learning the reward function that an expert is optimizing for, the algorithm can generate highly realistic language samples that mimic the expert's behavior.
The key innovations include a novel reward function parameterization, the use of Bayesian optimization, and the integration of reinforcement learning techniques. Experiments on both synthetic and real-world tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach.
While the paper makes an important step forward, there are still some limitations and areas for further research, such as exploring more expressive function approximators, addressing value alignment, and considering potential negative societal impacts. Overall, this work represents a promising advance in the quest to build AI systems that can communicate in a natural and human-like way.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Imitating Language via Scalable Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Markus Wulfmeier, Michael Bloesch, Nino Vieillard, Arun Ahuja, Jorg Bornschein, Sandy Huang, Artem Sokolov, Matt Barnes, Guillaume Desjardins, Alex Bewley, Sarah Maria Elisabeth Bechtle, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Nikola Momchev, Olivier Bachem, Matthieu Geist, Martin Riedmiller
The majority of language model training builds on imitation learning. It covers pretraining, supervised fine-tuning, and affects the starting conditions for reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). The simplicity and scalability of maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) for next token prediction led to its role as predominant paradigm. However, the broader field of imitation learning can more effectively utilize the sequential structure underlying autoregressive generation. We focus on investigating the inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) perspective to imitation, extracting rewards and directly optimizing sequences instead of individual token likelihoods and evaluate its benefits for fine-tuning large language models. We provide a new angle, reformulating inverse soft-Q-learning as a temporal difference regularized extension of MLE. This creates a principled connection between MLE and IRL and allows trading off added complexity with increased performance and diversity of generations in the supervised fine-tuning (SFT) setting. We find clear advantages for IRL-based imitation, in particular for retaining diversity while maximizing task performance, rendering IRL a strong alternative on fixed SFT datasets even without online data generation. Our analysis of IRL-extracted reward functions further indicates benefits for more robust reward functions via tighter integration of supervised and preference-based LLM post-training.
Read more9/4/2024
0
RILe: Reinforced Imitation Learning
Mert Albaba, Sammy Christen, Christoph Gebhardt, Thomas Langarek, Michael J. Black, Otmar Hilliges
Reinforcement Learning has achieved significant success in generating complex behavior but often requires extensive reward function engineering. Adversarial variants of Imitation Learning and Inverse Reinforcement Learning offer an alternative by learning policies from expert demonstrations via a discriminator. Employing discriminators increases their data- and computational efficiency over the standard approaches; however, results in sensitivity to imperfections in expert data. We propose RILe, a teacher-student system that achieves both robustness to imperfect data and efficiency. In RILe, the student learns an action policy while the teacher dynamically adjusts a reward function based on the student's performance and its alignment with expert demonstrations. By tailoring the reward function to both performance of the student and expert similarity, our system reduces dependence on the discriminator and, hence, increases robustness against data imperfections. Experiments show that RILe outperforms existing methods by 2x in settings with limited or noisy expert data.
Read more6/13/2024
🏅
0
Reinforcement Learning without Human Feedback for Last Mile Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models
Alec Solway
Reinforcement learning is used to align language models with human preference signals after first pre-training the model to predict the next token of text within a large corpus using likelihood maximization. Before being deployed in a specific domain, models are often further fine-tuned on task specific data. Since human preferences are often unavailable for the last step, it is performed using likelihood maximization as that is the typical default method. However, reinforcement learning has other advantages besides facilitating alignment to a human derived reward function. For one, whereas likelihood maximization is a form of imitation learning in which the model is trained on what to do under ideal conditions, reinforcement learning is not limited to demonstrating actions just for optimally reached states and trains a model what to do under a range of scenarios as it explores the policy space. In addition, it also trains a model what not to do, suppressing competitive but poor actions. This work develops a framework for last-mile fine-tuning using reinforcement learning and tests whether it garners performance gains. The experiments center on abstractive summarization, but the framework is general and broadly applicable. Use of the procedure produced significantly better results than likelihood maximization when comparing raw predictions. For the specific data tested, the gap could be bridged by employing post-processing of the maximum likelihood outputs. Nonetheless, the framework offers a new avenue for model optimization in situations where post-processing may be less straightforward or effective, and it can be extended to include more complex classes of undesirable outputs to penalize and train against, such as hallucinations.
Read more8/30/2024
🏅
0
Convergence of a model-free entropy-regularized inverse reinforcement learning algorithm
Titouan Renard, Andreas Schlaginhaufen, Tingting Ni, Maryam Kamgarpour
Given a dataset of expert demonstrations, inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to recover a reward for which the expert is optimal. This work proposes a model-free algorithm to solve entropy-regularized IRL problem. In particular, we employ a stochastic gradient descent update for the reward and a stochastic soft policy iteration update for the policy. Assuming access to a generative model, we prove that our algorithm is guaranteed to recover a reward for which the expert is $varepsilon$-optimal using $mathcal{O}(1/varepsilon^{2})$ samples of the Markov decision process (MDP). Furthermore, with $mathcal{O}(1/varepsilon^{4})$ samples we prove that the optimal policy corresponding to the recovered reward is $varepsilon$-close to the expert policy in total variation distance.
Read more4/24/2024