Reinforcement Learning without Human Feedback for Last Mile Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models
0
🏅
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a novel approach to fine-tuning large language models without relying on human feedback.
- The researchers develop a reinforcement learning-based method that allows the model to learn from its own interactions with the environment, rather than requiring manual labeling or oversight.
- The goal is to improve the model's performance on specific tasks while maintaining its general capabilities.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 are incredibly powerful, but fine-tuning them for specific tasks often requires a lot of human effort and feedback. This can be time-consuming and expensive, especially for tasks that require a lot of nuanced judgment.
The researchers in this paper propose a new approach that uses reinforcement learning to fine-tune LLMs without human intervention. The key idea is to let the model explore the task environment on its own, and then reward it for taking actions that lead to good outcomes. Over time, the model learns to optimize its behavior and perform the task more effectively.
This approach has several potential benefits:
- It reduces the need for human feedback, which can be costly and limited.
- It allows the model to discover novel solutions that a human might not have thought of.
- It can be applied to a wider range of tasks, since it doesn't rely on the availability of human-labeled data.
Of course, there are also some challenges and limitations to this approach, which we'll explore in the Critical Analysis section.
Technical Explanation
The researchers propose a reinforcement learning-based framework for fine-tuning LLMs without human feedback. The key components of their approach are:
-
Environment Interaction: The model is placed in a simulated environment that reflects the task it needs to learn. For example, in a text summarization task, the environment might provide the model with input text and reward it for generating high-quality summaries.
-
Reward Function: The researchers define a reward function that captures the desired behavior for the task. This function is used to evaluate the model's actions and provide feedback during training.
-
Policy Optimization: The model is trained using a policy gradient method, which adjusts the model's parameters to maximize the expected reward over time. This allows the model to learn an optimal policy for performing the task.
-
Distillation: After training, the researchers use a distillation process to transfer the learned policy back to the original LLM, effectively fine-tuning it for the target task.
The researchers evaluate their approach on a range of language tasks, including text summarization, question answering, and dialogue generation. They show that the fine-tuned models achieve competitive performance compared to those trained with human feedback, while retaining the general capabilities of the original LLMs.
Critical Analysis
One potential limitation of this approach is that the simulated environment may not fully capture the complexity and nuance of real-world tasks. The researchers acknowledge this and suggest that incorporating additional environmental signals or using more sophisticated reward functions could help address this issue.
Another concern is the potential for the model to learn undesirable or biased behavior. Without human oversight, the model may optimize for the wrong objectives or develop harmful tendencies. The researchers discuss the importance of carefully designing the reward function and monitoring the model's behavior during training to mitigate these risks.
Additionally, the computational and resource requirements of this approach may be higher than traditional fine-tuning methods, especially for large and complex LLMs. The researchers note that further research is needed to improve the efficiency and scalability of their framework.
Conclusion
The researchers in this paper have presented a novel approach to fine-tuning large language models without relying on human feedback. By using reinforcement learning to let the model explore and learn from its own interactions with the environment, they've demonstrated a way to improve task-specific performance while preserving the model's general capabilities.
This work has the potential to significantly reduce the time and effort required to adapt LLMs for a wide range of applications, opening up new possibilities for their use in real-world settings. However, it also raises important questions about the ethical and practical implications of deploying such models without direct human oversight.
As the field of AI continues to evolve, approaches like the one described in this paper will likely play an increasingly important role in advancing the capabilities of large language models and other AI systems. Continued research and thoughtful consideration of the implications will be crucial to ensure these technologies are developed and deployed responsibly.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏅
0
Reinforcement Learning without Human Feedback for Last Mile Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models
Alec Solway
Reinforcement learning is used to align language models with human preference signals after first pre-training the model to predict the next token of text within a large corpus using likelihood maximization. Before being deployed in a specific domain, models are often further fine-tuned on task specific data. Since human preferences are often unavailable for the last step, it is performed using likelihood maximization as that is the typical default method. However, reinforcement learning has other advantages besides facilitating alignment to a human derived reward function. For one, whereas likelihood maximization is a form of imitation learning in which the model is trained on what to do under ideal conditions, reinforcement learning is not limited to demonstrating actions just for optimally reached states and trains a model what to do under a range of scenarios as it explores the policy space. In addition, it also trains a model what not to do, suppressing competitive but poor actions. This work develops a framework for last-mile fine-tuning using reinforcement learning and tests whether it garners performance gains. The experiments center on abstractive summarization, but the framework is general and broadly applicable. Use of the procedure produced significantly better results than likelihood maximization when comparing raw predictions. For the specific data tested, the gap could be bridged by employing post-processing of the maximum likelihood outputs. Nonetheless, the framework offers a new avenue for model optimization in situations where post-processing may be less straightforward or effective, and it can be extended to include more complex classes of undesirable outputs to penalize and train against, such as hallucinations.
Read more8/30/2024
🧠
0
Aligning Neural Machine Translation Models: Human Feedback in Training and Inference
Miguel Moura Ramos, Patrick Fernandes, Ant'onio Farinhas, Andr'e F. T. Martins
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a recent technique to improve the quality of the text generated by a language model, making it closer to what humans would generate. A core ingredient in RLHF's success in aligning and improving large language models (LLMs) is its reward model, trained using human feedback on model outputs. In machine translation (MT), where metrics trained from human annotations can readily be used as reward models, recent methods using minimum Bayes risk decoding and reranking have succeeded in improving the final quality of translation. In this study, we comprehensively explore and compare techniques for integrating quality metrics as reward models into the MT pipeline. This includes using the reward model for data filtering, during the training phase through RL, and at inference time by employing reranking techniques, and we assess the effects of combining these in a unified approach. Our experimental results, conducted across multiple translation tasks, underscore the crucial role of effective data filtering, based on estimated quality, in harnessing the full potential of RL in enhancing MT quality. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of combining RL training with reranking techniques, showcasing substantial improvements in translation quality.
Read more7/8/2024
0
Imitating Language via Scalable Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Markus Wulfmeier, Michael Bloesch, Nino Vieillard, Arun Ahuja, Jorg Bornschein, Sandy Huang, Artem Sokolov, Matt Barnes, Guillaume Desjardins, Alex Bewley, Sarah Maria Elisabeth Bechtle, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Nikola Momchev, Olivier Bachem, Matthieu Geist, Martin Riedmiller
The majority of language model training builds on imitation learning. It covers pretraining, supervised fine-tuning, and affects the starting conditions for reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). The simplicity and scalability of maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) for next token prediction led to its role as predominant paradigm. However, the broader field of imitation learning can more effectively utilize the sequential structure underlying autoregressive generation. We focus on investigating the inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) perspective to imitation, extracting rewards and directly optimizing sequences instead of individual token likelihoods and evaluate its benefits for fine-tuning large language models. We provide a new angle, reformulating inverse soft-Q-learning as a temporal difference regularized extension of MLE. This creates a principled connection between MLE and IRL and allows trading off added complexity with increased performance and diversity of generations in the supervised fine-tuning (SFT) setting. We find clear advantages for IRL-based imitation, in particular for retaining diversity while maximizing task performance, rendering IRL a strong alternative on fixed SFT datasets even without online data generation. Our analysis of IRL-extracted reward functions further indicates benefits for more robust reward functions via tighter integration of supervised and preference-based LLM post-training.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Nash Learning from Human Feedback
R'emi Munos, Michal Valko, Daniele Calandriello, Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar, Mark Rowland, Zhaohan Daniel Guo, Yunhao Tang, Matthieu Geist, Thomas Mesnard, Andrea Michi, Marco Selvi, Sertan Girgin, Nikola Momchev, Olivier Bachem, Daniel J. Mankowitz, Doina Precup, Bilal Piot
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as the main paradigm for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. Typically, RLHF involves the initial step of learning a reward model from human feedback, often expressed as preferences between pairs of text generations produced by a pre-trained LLM. Subsequently, the LLM's policy is fine-tuned by optimizing it to maximize the reward model through a reinforcement learning algorithm. However, an inherent limitation of current reward models is their inability to fully represent the richness of human preferences and their dependency on the sampling distribution. In this study, we introduce an alternative pipeline for the fine-tuning of LLMs using pairwise human feedback. Our approach entails the initial learning of a preference model, which is conditioned on two inputs given a prompt, followed by the pursuit of a policy that consistently generates responses preferred over those generated by any competing policy, thus defining the Nash equilibrium of this preference model. We term this approach Nash learning from human feedback (NLHF). In the context of a tabular policy representation, we present a novel algorithmic solution, Nash-MD, founded on the principles of mirror descent. This algorithm produces a sequence of policies, with the last iteration converging to the regularized Nash equilibrium. Additionally, we explore parametric representations of policies and introduce gradient descent algorithms for deep-learning architectures. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, we present experimental results involving the fine-tuning of a LLM for a text summarization task. We believe NLHF offers a compelling avenue for preference learning and policy optimization with the potential of advancing the field of aligning LLMs with human preferences.
Read more6/12/2024