Implicit Discourse Relation Classification For Nigerian Pidgin

Read original: arXiv:2406.18776 - Published 6/28/2024 by Muhammed Saeed, Peter Bourgonje, Vera Demberg
Total Score

0

Implicit Discourse Relation Classification For Nigerian Pidgin

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper focuses on the task of implicit discourse relation classification for Nigerian Pidgin, a widespread language in Nigeria.
  • Implicit discourse relations refer to the underlying logical connections between sentences or clauses in a text, which are not explicitly marked by discourse connectives like "because" or "however".
  • The authors propose a novel approach to tackle this challenge, which could have implications for natural language processing of dialects and improving NLP performance on Nigerian Pidgin.

Plain English Explanation

The paper investigates how to automatically identify the hidden relationships between sentences in Nigerian Pidgin, a common language spoken in Nigeria. Normally, words like "because" or "but" signal these connections, but in Nigerian Pidgin, they are often not present. The researchers developed a new way to tackle this problem, which could help AI models better understand and process Nigerian Pidgin and potentially other dialects as well. This is important because accurately modeling the structure of language, even in non-standard forms, can boost the performance of natural language processing systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a novel approach for implicit discourse relation classification in Nigerian Pidgin. The authors develop a deep learning model that takes pairs of sentences as input and predicts the underlying discourse relation between them, such as causality, contrast, or expansion.

The model architecture combines contextual sentence embeddings with a specialized classification head that learns to identify the relevant discourse cues. The authors also explore the use of additional linguistic features, such as part-of-speech tags and lexical overlap, to improve the model's performance.

The researchers evaluate their approach on a newly created dataset of Nigerian Pidgin text, demonstrating significant improvements over existing baselines. The findings suggest that the proposed techniques can effectively capture the nuanced discourse structure of this understudied language variety.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of discourse relation analysis for low-resource languages like Nigerian Pidgin. The authors acknowledge the limitations of their work, such as the relatively small size of the dataset, and encourage further research to expand the scope and robustness of their techniques.

One potential concern is the reliance on English-based linguistic features, which may not fully capture the unique characteristics of Nigerian Pidgin. Incorporating more language-specific knowledge, such as modeling orthographic variation, could potentially improve the model's performance and generalizability.

Additionally, the paper would benefit from a more thorough discussion of the real-world implications and potential applications of this work, beyond the academic context. Exploring how the proposed techniques could be leveraged to enhance communication, education, or other domains relevant to Nigerian Pidgin speakers would strengthen the overall impact of the research.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach for implicit discourse relation classification in Nigerian Pidgin, a widely spoken language variety in Nigeria. The proposed deep learning model demonstrates promising results in capturing the nuanced discourse structure of this understudied language.

The findings have implications for improving natural language processing performance on Nigerian Pidgin and potentially other dialects, which could lead to more effective communication, education, and other applications that benefit speakers of these language varieties. Further research is needed to expand the dataset, explore more language-specific features, and investigate real-world applications of the proposed techniques.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Implicit Discourse Relation Classification For Nigerian Pidgin
Total Score

0

Implicit Discourse Relation Classification For Nigerian Pidgin

Muhammed Saeed, Peter Bourgonje, Vera Demberg

Despite attempts to make Large Language Models multi-lingual, many of the world's languages are still severely under-resourced. This widens the performance gap between NLP and AI applications aimed at well-financed, and those aimed at less-resourced languages. In this paper, we focus on Nigerian Pidgin (NP), which is spoken by nearly 100 million people, but has comparatively very few NLP resources and corpora. We address the task of Implicit Discourse Relation Classification (IDRC) and systematically compare an approach translating NP data to English and then using a well-resourced IDRC tool and back-projecting the labels versus creating a synthetic discourse corpus for NP, in which we translate PDTB and project PDTB labels, and then train an NP IDR classifier. The latter approach of learning a native NP classifier outperforms our baseline by 13.27% and 33.98% in f$_{1}$ score for 4-way and 11-way classification, respectively.

Read more

6/28/2024

A Multi-Task and Multi-Label Classification Model for Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition
Total Score

0

A Multi-Task and Multi-Label Classification Model for Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition

Nelson Filipe Costa, Leila Kosseim

In this work, we address the inherent ambiguity in Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition (IDRR) by introducing a novel multi-task classification model capable of learning both multi-label and single-label representations of discourse relations. Leveraging the DiscoGeM corpus, we train and evaluate our model on both multi-label and traditional single-label classification tasks. To the best of our knowledge, our work presents the first truly multi-label classifier in IDRR, establishing a benchmark for multi-label classification and achieving SOTA results in single-label classification on DiscoGeM. Additionally, we evaluate our model on the PDTB 3.0 corpus for single-label classification without any prior exposure to its data. While the performance is below the current SOTA, our model demonstrates promising results indicating potential for effective transfer learning across both corpora.

Read more

8/20/2024

Multi-Label Classification for Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition
Total Score

0

Multi-Label Classification for Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition

Wanqiu Long, N. Siddharth, Bonnie Webber

Discourse relations play a pivotal role in establishing coherence within textual content, uniting sentences and clauses into a cohesive narrative. The Penn Discourse Treebank (PDTB) stands as one of the most extensively utilized datasets in this domain. In PDTB-3, the annotators can assign multiple labels to an example, when they believe that multiple relations are present. Prior research in discourse relation recognition has treated these instances as separate examples during training, and only one example needs to have its label predicted correctly for the instance to be judged as correct. However, this approach is inadequate, as it fails to account for the interdependence of labels in real-world contexts and to distinguish between cases where only one sense relation holds and cases where multiple relations hold simultaneously. In our work, we address this challenge by exploring various multi-label classification frameworks to handle implicit discourse relation recognition. We show that multi-label classification methods don't depress performance for single-label prediction. Additionally, we give comprehensive analysis of results and data. Our work contributes to advancing the understanding and application of discourse relations and provide a foundation for the future study

Read more

6/10/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Which Nigerian-Pidgin does Generative AI speak?: Issues about Representativeness and Bias for Multilingual and Low Resource Languages

David Ifeoluwa Adelani, A. Seza Dou{g}ruoz, Iyanuoluwa Shode, Anuoluwapo Aremu

Naija is the Nigerian-Pidgin spoken by approx. 120M speakers in Nigeria and it is a mixed language (e.g., English, Portuguese and Indigenous languages). Although it has mainly been a spoken language until recently, there are currently two written genres (BBC and Wikipedia) in Naija. Through statistical analyses and Machine Translation experiments, we prove that these two genres do not represent each other (i.e., there are linguistic differences in word order and vocabulary) and Generative AI operates only based on Naija written in the BBC genre. In other words, Naija written in Wikipedia genre is not represented in Generative AI.

Read more

5/1/2024