Improved Regret Bounds for Bandits with Expert Advice
0
🤖
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents improved regret bounds for the "bandits with expert advice" problem, which involves making decisions under uncertainty while learning from the recommendations of multiple experts.
- The authors propose a new algorithm called Weighted Majority with Exploration (WME) that outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods in terms of regret bounds.
- The key innovations include a novel exploration strategy and a more efficient way of combining expert advice, leading to regret bounds that are nearly optimal.
Plain English Explanation
In the "bandits with expert advice" problem, an agent must make a sequence of decisions under uncertainty, such as which product to recommend to a customer. The agent has access to the advice of multiple experts, but the experts may not always be reliable. The goal is to make decisions that minimize the agent's "regret" - the difference between the performance of the agent's decisions and the performance of the best single expert.
The new Weighted Majority with Exploration (WME) algorithm proposed in this paper improves upon previous algorithms for this problem. WME uses a novel exploration strategy, where the agent occasionally makes a random decision instead of following the expert advice. This exploration helps the agent learn which experts are more reliable over time. WME also combines the expert advice in a more efficient way, leading to regret bounds that are nearly as good as what would be possible if the agent knew in advance which expert was the best.
These improvements make WME a more effective tool for real-world decision-making problems where there are multiple sources of advice, but the reliability of each source is unknown. For example, link to "Near-Optimal Per-Action Regret Bounds for Sleeping Bandits" WME could be used to help a retailer decide which products to recommend to customers based on the advice of various marketing experts, while link to "Real-Price Bandit for Information Multiclass Classification" minimizing the regret of making the wrong recommendations.
Technical Explanation
The authors consider the "bandits with expert advice" problem, where an agent must make a sequence of decisions under uncertainty while receiving recommendations from multiple experts. At each round, the agent chooses an action based on the experts' advice, and then observes the rewards for the chosen action. The agent's goal is to minimize their "regret" - the difference between the agent's cumulative rewards and the cumulative rewards of the best single expert.
The authors propose a new algorithm called Weighted Majority with Exploration (WME) that builds on the classic Weighted Majority algorithm. WME works by maintaining a weight for each expert that reflects the agent's belief in that expert's reliability. At each round, the agent chooses an action probabilistically, with the probability of choosing an action proportional to the sum of the weights of the experts recommending that action. However, unlike the original Weighted Majority algorithm, WME also sometimes chooses a random action with a small probability, in order to explore and learn which experts are more reliable.
The authors prove that the regret of the WME algorithm is bounded by O(sqrt(T log(K))), where T is the number of rounds and K is the number of experts. This regret bound is nearly optimal, and improves upon the best previously known bounds for the bandits with expert advice problem, as shown in link to "Improved Regret Bounds for Bandit Convex Optimization with Delayed Feedback" and link to "Improved Bound for Robust Causal Bandits with Linear Models".
The key innovations that allow WME to achieve these improved regret bounds are the novel exploration strategy and the more efficient way of combining expert advice. By occasionally exploring and making random decisions, WME is able to learn which experts are more reliable over time. And by using a more sophisticated weighting scheme for the experts, WME is able to make better decisions and achieve lower regret.
Critical Analysis
The authors have provided a thorough theoretical analysis of the WME algorithm and its regret bounds. The proof techniques used in the paper are technically sophisticated and the results appear to be solid. However, the authors do not provide any experimental evaluations of WME compared to other state-of-the-art algorithms for the bandits with expert advice problem.
While the regret bounds derived for WME are nearly optimal, it would be helpful to see how the algorithm performs in practice on realistic problem instances. The paper also does not discuss potential limitations or caveats of the WME approach, such as how it might perform in the presence of adversarial experts or when the number of experts is very large.
Additionally, the authors do not discuss how the WME algorithm could be extended or generalized to other related problems, such as link to "Linear Bandits with Polylogarithmic Minimax Regret". Exploring these connections and potential applications could help situate the results of this paper within the broader context of sequential decision-making under uncertainty.
Overall, this paper presents a technically solid contribution to the bandits with expert advice literature. However, the lack of empirical evaluation and discussion of potential limitations or extensions leaves some open questions that could be addressed in future work.
Conclusion
This paper introduces the Weighted Majority with Exploration (WME) algorithm, which achieves nearly optimal regret bounds for the "bandits with expert advice" problem. WME improves upon previous state-of-the-art methods by using a novel exploration strategy and a more efficient way of combining expert advice.
The key innovations in WME make it a promising tool for real-world decision-making problems where there are multiple sources of advice, but the reliability of each source is unknown. By balancing exploration and exploitation, WME is able to learn which experts are more trustworthy over time, leading to better decisions and lower regret.
While the theoretical analysis in the paper is rigorous, further empirical evaluation and discussion of potential limitations and extensions would help provide a more complete picture of the WME algorithm's performance and applicability. Overall, this work represents an important advancement in the field of sequential decision-making under uncertainty.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤖
0
Improved Regret Bounds for Bandits with Expert Advice
Nicol`o Cesa-Bianchi, Khaled Eldowa, Emmanuel Esposito, Julia Olkhovskaya
In this research note, we revisit the bandits with expert advice problem. Under a restricted feedback model, we prove a lower bound of order $sqrt{K T ln(N/K)}$ for the worst-case regret, where $K$ is the number of actions, $N>K$ the number of experts, and $T$ the time horizon. This matches a previously known upper bound of the same order and improves upon the best available lower bound of $sqrt{K T (ln N) / (ln K)}$. For the standard feedback model, we prove a new instance-based upper bound that depends on the agreement between the experts and provides a logarithmic improvement compared to prior results.
Read more6/26/2024
👀
0
Near-optimal Per-Action Regret Bounds for Sleeping Bandits
Quan Nguyen, Nishant A. Mehta
We derive near-optimal per-action regret bounds for sleeping bandits, in which both the sets of available arms and their losses in every round are chosen by an adversary. In a setting with $K$ total arms and at most $A$ available arms in each round over $T$ rounds, the best known upper bound is $O(Ksqrt{TAln{K}})$, obtained indirectly via minimizing internal sleeping regrets. Compared to the minimax $Omega(sqrt{TA})$ lower bound, this upper bound contains an extra multiplicative factor of $Kln{K}$. We address this gap by directly minimizing the per-action regret using generalized versions of EXP3, EXP3-IX and FTRL with Tsallis entropy, thereby obtaining near-optimal bounds of order $O(sqrt{TAln{K}})$ and $O(sqrt{Tsqrt{AK}})$. We extend our results to the setting of bandits with advice from sleeping experts, generalizing EXP4 along the way. This leads to new proofs for a number of existing adaptive and tracking regret bounds for standard non-sleeping bandits. Extending our results to the bandit version of experts that report their confidences leads to new bounds for the confidence regret that depends primarily on the sum of experts' confidences. We prove a lower bound, showing that for any minimax optimal algorithms, there exists an action whose regret is sublinear in $T$ but linear in the number of its active rounds.
Read more5/31/2024
🏷️
0
The Real Price of Bandit Information in Multiclass Classification
Liad Erez, Alon Cohen, Tomer Koren, Yishay Mansour, Shay Moran
We revisit the classical problem of multiclass classification with bandit feedback (Kakade, Shalev-Shwartz and Tewari, 2008), where each input classifies to one of $K$ possible labels and feedback is restricted to whether the predicted label is correct or not. Our primary inquiry is with regard to the dependency on the number of labels $K$, and whether $T$-step regret bounds in this setting can be improved beyond the $smash{sqrt{KT}}$ dependence exhibited by existing algorithms. Our main contribution is in showing that the minimax regret of bandit multiclass is in fact more nuanced, and is of the form $smash{widetilde{Theta}left(min left{|H| + sqrt{T}, sqrt{KT log |H|} right} right) }$, where $H$ is the underlying (finite) hypothesis class. In particular, we present a new bandit classification algorithm that guarantees regret $smash{widetilde{O}(|H|+sqrt{T})}$, improving over classical algorithms for moderately-sized hypothesis classes, and give a matching lower bound establishing tightness of the upper bounds (up to log-factors) in all parameter regimes.
Read more6/21/2024
🛠️
0
Improved Regret for Bandit Convex Optimization with Delayed Feedback
Yuanyu Wan, Chang Yao, Mingli Song, Lijun Zhang
We investigate bandit convex optimization (BCO) with delayed feedback, where only the loss value of the action is revealed under an arbitrary delay. Let $n,T,bar{d}$ denote the dimensionality, time horizon, and average delay, respectively. Previous studies have achieved an $O(sqrt{n}T^{3/4}+(nbar{d})^{1/3}T^{2/3})$ regret bound for this problem, whose delay-independent part matches the regret of the classical non-delayed bandit gradient descent algorithm. However, there is a large gap between its delay-dependent part, i.e., $O((nbar{d})^{1/3}T^{2/3})$, and an existing $Omega(sqrt{bar{d}T})$ lower bound. In this paper, we illustrate that this gap can be filled in the worst case, where $bar{d}$ is very close to the maximum delay $d$. Specifically, we first develop a novel algorithm, and prove that it enjoys a regret bound of $O(sqrt{n}T^{3/4}+sqrt{dT})$ in general. Compared with the previous result, our regret bound is better for $d=O((nbar{d})^{2/3}T^{1/3})$, and the delay-dependent part is tight in the worst case. The primary idea is to decouple the joint effect of the delays and the bandit feedback on the regret by carefully incorporating the delayed bandit feedback with a blocking update mechanism. Furthermore, we show that the proposed algorithm can improve the regret bound to $O((nT)^{2/3}log^{1/3}T+dlog T)$ for strongly convex functions. Finally, if the action sets are unconstrained, we demonstrate that it can be simply extended to achieve an $O(nsqrt{Tlog T}+dlog T)$ regret bound for strongly convex and smooth functions.
Read more6/26/2024