Improving Alignment and Robustness with Short Circuiting
1
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents a technique called "short circuiting" to improve the alignment and robustness of neural networks.
- Short circuiting is a method that allows a neural network to bypass part of its own computation, potentially making it more aligned with desired objectives and more robust to certain types of adversarial attacks.
- The authors conduct experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of short circuiting in improving alignment and robustness across different neural network architectures and tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have developed a new technique called "short circuiting" that can help make neural networks more reliable and trustworthy. Neural networks are a type of artificial intelligence that are inspired by the human brain, and they are used for all sorts of tasks like image recognition, language processing, and decision-making.
One of the challenges with neural networks is that they can sometimes behave in unexpected or undesirable ways, especially when faced with adversarial attacks - situations where someone tries to trick the network into making mistakes. The short circuiting technique aims to address this by allowing the network to bypass certain parts of its own decision-making process when it's not confident about the input it's receiving.
By doing this, the network can become more "aligned" with the intended objectives, meaning it's more likely to do what we want it to do. It can also make the network more "robust," or resistant to being fooled by adversarial attacks. The researchers ran a number of experiments to test how well short circuiting works, and they found that it can significantly improve a neural network's performance and reliability in different scenarios.
This work is important because as AI systems become more powerful and integrated into our lives, it's crucial that we can trust them to behave in a safe and predictable way. Techniques like short circuiting could help us get one step closer to that goal.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel technique called "short circuiting" to improve the alignment and robustness of neural networks. Short circuiting is a method that allows a neural network to bypass part of its own computation, potentially making it more aligned with desired objectives and more robust to certain types of adversarial attacks.
The authors conduct experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of short circuiting across different neural network architectures and tasks. They find that short circuiting can significantly improve a network's performance and reliability, making it more aligned with intended objectives and more robust to adversarial attacks.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a well-designed and thorough evaluation of the short circuiting technique, exploring its impact on alignment and robustness across a range of neural network architectures and tasks. However, the authors acknowledge that the technique may have certain limitations or caveats.
For example, the short circuiting mechanism could potentially be vulnerable to adversarial attacks specifically targeting the bypass mechanism. Additionally, the authors note that the optimal implementation of short circuiting may depend on the specific neural network and task at hand, requiring further research to fully understand its capabilities and limitations.
It would also be valuable to investigate how short circuiting interacts with other techniques for improving AI robustness and alignment, such as those explored in related research. Overall, the paper presents a promising approach, but more work is needed to fully assess its potential and limitations in real-world AI systems.
Conclusion
The paper introduces a novel technique called "short circuiting" that can improve the alignment and robustness of neural networks. The authors demonstrate through extensive experiments that short circuiting can significantly enhance a network's performance and reliability, making it more aligned with intended objectives and more resistant to adversarial attacks.
This work is an important step towards developing AI systems that are more trustworthy and behave in a safe and predictable manner, which is crucial as AI becomes increasingly integrated into our lives. While the technique shows promise, further research is needed to fully understand its capabilities and limitations, as well as how it can be combined with other approaches to improve AI alignment and robustness.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
1
Improving Alignment and Robustness with Short Circuiting
Andy Zou, Long Phan, Justin Wang, Derek Duenas, Maxwell Lin, Maksym Andriushchenko, Rowan Wang, Zico Kolter, Matt Fredrikson, Dan Hendrycks
AI systems can take harmful actions and are highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks. We present an approach, inspired by recent advances in representation engineering, that interrupts the models as they respond with harmful outputs with circuit breakers. Existing techniques aimed at improving alignment, such as refusal training, are often bypassed. Techniques such as adversarial training try to plug these holes by countering specific attacks. As an alternative to refusal training and adversarial training, circuit-breaking directly controls the representations that are responsible for harmful outputs in the first place. Our technique can be applied to both text-only and multimodal language models to prevent the generation of harmful outputs without sacrificing utility -- even in the presence of powerful unseen attacks. Notably, while adversarial robustness in standalone image recognition remains an open challenge, circuit breakers allow the larger multimodal system to reliably withstand image hijacks that aim to produce harmful content. Finally, we extend our approach to AI agents, demonstrating considerable reductions in the rate of harmful actions when they are under attack. Our approach represents a significant step forward in the development of reliable safeguards to harmful behavior and adversarial attacks.
Read more7/15/2024
💬
0
ShortCircuit: AlphaZero-Driven Circuit Design
Dimitrios Tsaras, Antoine Grosnit, Lei Chen, Zhiyao Xie, Haitham Bou-Ammar, Mingxuan Yuan
Chip design relies heavily on generating Boolean circuits, such as AND-Inverter Graphs (AIGs), from functional descriptions like truth tables. While recent advances in deep learning have aimed to accelerate circuit design, these efforts have mostly focused on tasks other than synthesis, and traditional heuristic methods have plateaued. In this paper, we introduce ShortCircuit, a novel transformer-based architecture that leverages the structural properties of AIGs and performs efficient space exploration. Contrary to prior approaches attempting end-to-end generation of logic circuits using deep networks, ShortCircuit employs a two-phase process combining supervised with reinforcement learning to enhance generalization to unseen truth tables. We also propose an AlphaZero variant to handle the double exponentially large state space and the sparsity of the rewards, enabling the discovery of near-optimal designs. To evaluate the generative performance of our trained model , we extract 500 truth tables from a benchmark set of 20 real-world circuits. ShortCircuit successfully generates AIGs for 84.6% of the 8-input test truth tables, and outperforms the state-of-the-art logic synthesis tool, ABC, by 14.61% in terms of circuits size.
Read more8/20/2024
0
Are aligned neural networks adversarially aligned?
Nicholas Carlini, Milad Nasr, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Matthew Jagielski, Irena Gao, Anas Awadalla, Pang Wei Koh, Daphne Ippolito, Katherine Lee, Florian Tramer, Ludwig Schmidt
Large language models are now tuned to align with the goals of their creators, namely to be helpful and harmless. These models should respond helpfully to user questions, but refuse to answer requests that could cause harm. However, adversarial users can construct inputs which circumvent attempts at alignment. In this work, we study adversarial alignment, and ask to what extent these models remain aligned when interacting with an adversarial user who constructs worst-case inputs (adversarial examples). These inputs are designed to cause the model to emit harmful content that would otherwise be prohibited. We show that existing NLP-based optimization attacks are insufficiently powerful to reliably attack aligned text models: even when current NLP-based attacks fail, we can find adversarial inputs with brute force. As a result, the failure of current attacks should not be seen as proof that aligned text models remain aligned under adversarial inputs. However the recent trend in large-scale ML models is multimodal models that allow users to provide images that influence the text that is generated. We show these models can be easily attacked, i.e., induced to perform arbitrary un-aligned behavior through adversarial perturbation of the input image. We conjecture that improved NLP attacks may demonstrate this same level of adversarial control over text-only models.
Read more5/7/2024
0
Robustifying Safety-Aligned Large Language Models through Clean Data Curation
Xiaoqun Liu, Jiacheng Liang, Muchao Ye, Zhaohan Xi
Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable when trained on datasets containing harmful content, which leads to potential jailbreaking attacks in two scenarios: the integration of harmful texts within crowdsourced data used for pre-training and direct tampering with LLMs through fine-tuning. In both scenarios, adversaries can compromise the safety alignment of LLMs, exacerbating malfunctions. Motivated by the need to mitigate these adversarial influences, our research aims to enhance safety alignment by either neutralizing the impact of malicious texts in pre-training datasets or increasing the difficulty of jailbreaking during downstream fine-tuning. In this paper, we propose a data curation framework designed to counter adversarial impacts in both scenarios. Our method operates under the assumption that we have no prior knowledge of attack details, focusing solely on curating clean texts. We introduce an iterative process aimed at revising texts to reduce their perplexity as perceived by LLMs, while simultaneously preserving their text quality. By pre-training or fine-tuning LLMs with curated clean texts, we observe a notable improvement in LLM robustness regarding safety alignment against harmful queries. For instance, when pre-training LLMs using a crowdsourced dataset containing 5% harmful instances, adding an equivalent amount of curated texts significantly mitigates the likelihood of providing harmful responses in LLMs and reduces the attack success rate by 71%. Our study represents a significant step towards mitigating the risks associated with training-based jailbreaking and fortifying the secure utilization of LLMs.
Read more6/3/2024