Improving Deep Learning Model Calibration for Cardiac Applications using Deterministic Uncertainty Networks and Uncertainty-aware Training

Overview

• This paper evaluates methods to improve the calibration of deep learning (DL) classification models, which is important for their use in decision-support systems.
• The researchers tested two main approaches: deterministic uncertainty methods (DUMs) and uncertainty-aware training.
• They evaluated these methods on two real-world clinical applications: artefact detection in cardiac MRI and disease diagnosis from cardiac MRI data.

Plain English Explanation

Deep learning models are increasingly being used to support important decisions, such as in healthcare applications. However, these models can sometimes be overly confident in their predictions, even when they are wrong. This lack of calibration can undermine trust and lead to harmful outcomes in high-risk settings.

The researchers in this paper looked at ways to improve the calibration of deep learning classification models. They tested two main approaches: deterministic uncertainty methods (DUMs) and uncertainty-aware training.

DUMs are techniques that can estimate the uncertainty in a model's predictions without requiring changes to the model architecture or training process. The researchers tested three different DUM approaches. Uncertainty-aware training refers to modifying the training process to encourage the model to learn about its own uncertainty.

The researchers applied these methods to two real-world medical imaging tasks: detecting artifacts in cardiac MRI scans and diagnosing heart disease from cardiac MRI data. They found that both DUMs and uncertainty-aware training could improve the accuracy and calibration of the deep learning models in these applications. DUMs generally offered the best improvements, but the researchers also found that combining DUMs with uncertainty-aware training provided further gains in some cases.

Technical Explanation

The researchers evaluated the impact of two types of approaches on the accuracy and calibration of deep learning classification models: deterministic uncertainty methods (DUMs) and uncertainty-aware training.

They tested three DUM approaches:

1. Temperature scaling
2. Ensemble methods
3. Bayesian neural networks

They also evaluated two uncertainty-aware training methods:

1. Error-driven uncertainty-aware training
2. Probabilistic uncertainty quantification

The researchers applied these methods to two real-world clinical applications:

1. Artefact detection from phase contrast cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging
2. Disease diagnosis from the public ACDC CMR dataset

They measured the models' accuracy and calibration performance, finding that both DUMs and uncertainty-aware training could improve these metrics in both applications. DUMs generally offered the best improvements, but the researchers also explored combining DUMs with uncertainty-aware training, resulting in a novel "deterministic uncertainty-aware training" approach that provided further gains in some cases.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of techniques to improve the calibration of deep learning classification models, which is an important issue for their use in high-stakes decision-support systems. The researchers' use of real-world medical imaging tasks as test cases lends practical relevance to their findings.

One potential limitation is the focus on only two specific clinical applications. While these are valuable case studies, it would be helpful to see the methods tested on a broader range of tasks and datasets to assess their generalizability. Additionally, the paper does not provide much insight into the computational or training time requirements of the different approaches, which could be an important practical consideration.

The authors also do not delve deeply into the over-confidence phenomenon observed in many modern deep learning models. Further investigation into the underlying causes of this issue could help guide the development of more principled solutions.

Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution by rigorously evaluating several promising techniques for improving deep learning calibration. The findings could have important implications for the responsible deployment of deep learning in real-world decision-support applications.

Conclusion

This paper examined methods to improve the calibration of deep learning classification models, which is crucial for their use in high-risk decision-support settings. The researchers evaluated both deterministic uncertainty methods (DUMs) and uncertainty-aware training approaches on two real-world medical imaging tasks.

Their results indicate that both DUMs and uncertainty-aware training can enhance both the accuracy and calibration of deep learning models in these applications, with DUMs generally offering the best improvements. The researchers also explored combining these two approaches, leading to a novel "deterministic uncertainty-aware training" method that provided further gains in some cases.

These findings have important implications for the responsible deployment of deep learning in high-stakes decision-support systems, where overconfident and miscalibrated predictions could have serious consequences. By improving model calibration, these techniques could help build greater trust and safer use of deep learning in critical domains like healthcare.