Improving Neural Additive Models with Bayesian Principles

Read original: arXiv:2305.16905 - Published 5/30/2024 by Kouroche Bouchiat, Alexander Immer, Hugo Y`eche, Gunnar Ratsch, Vincent Fortuin
Total Score

0

🧠

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Neural Additive Models (NAMs) aim to enhance the transparency of deep neural networks by handling input features in separate additive sub-networks.
  • However, NAMs lack inherent mechanisms to provide calibrated uncertainties and enable selection of relevant features and interactions.
  • This paper approaches NAMs from a Bayesian perspective, augmenting them in three ways:
    1. Providing credible intervals for the individual additive sub-networks.
    2. Estimating the marginal likelihood to perform an implicit selection of features via an empirical Bayes procedure.
    3. Facilitating the ranking of feature pairs as candidates for second-order interaction in fine-tuned models.
  • The researchers develop Laplace-Approximated NAMs (LA-NAMs), which show improved empirical performance on tabular datasets and challenging real-world medical tasks.

Plain English Explanation

Neural Additive Models (NAMs) are a type of machine learning model that tries to make deep neural networks more transparent. They do this by handling each input feature in a separate "sub-network" that adds its contribution to the final prediction.

However, NAMs don't have built-in ways to provide reliable estimates of the uncertainty in their predictions, or to automatically identify the most important features and interactions between them.

This paper takes a Bayesian approach to enhancing NAMs in three key ways:

  1. Uncertainty estimates: The new "Laplace-Approximated NAM" (LA-NAM) model can provide credible intervals, which are a measure of how confident the model is in its predictions for each individual input feature.

  2. Feature selection: LA-NAM can estimate the "marginal likelihood" to automatically determine which features are most relevant, without the need for manual feature engineering.

  3. Interaction detection: LA-NAM can rank pairs of features based on how much they interact with each other, making it easier to identify important higher-order relationships in the data.

The researchers show that LA-NAM outperforms standard NAMs on a variety of real-world datasets, including challenging medical prediction tasks. This suggests that the Bayesian enhancements can make NAMs more powerful and usable in practice.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces Laplace-Approximated Neural Additive Models (LA-NAMs), which augment standard Neural Additive Models (NAMs) with Bayesian capabilities.

Specifically, LA-NAMs provide:

  1. Uncertainty quantification: LA-NAMs use a Laplace approximation to generate credible intervals for the contributions of individual input features, giving a measure of confidence in the model's predictions.

  2. Automated feature selection: LA-NAMs estimate the marginal likelihood to perform an implicit selection of relevant features, without the need for manual feature engineering.

  3. Higher-order interaction detection: LA-NAMs facilitate the ranking of feature pairs as candidates for second-order interactions, which can be further explored in fine-tuned models.

The authors evaluate LA-NAMs on a variety of tabular datasets, as well as challenging real-world medical prediction tasks. The results demonstrate that LA-NAMs outperform standard NAMs in terms of predictive performance, calibration, and interpretability.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling Bayesian approach to enhancing the capabilities of Neural Additive Models. The proposed LA-NAM model addresses several key limitations of standard NAMs, providing important functionality such as uncertainty quantification, automated feature selection, and interaction detection.

One potential limitation of the LA-NAM approach is the reliance on the Laplace approximation, which may not always provide an accurate representation of the true posterior distribution, especially for complex, highly nonlinear models. The authors acknowledge this and suggest exploring alternative approximation methods, such as Variational Inference, as an area for future research.

Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of LA-NAMs on a range of datasets, it would be valuable to see how the model performs on even larger and more diverse datasets, particularly in domains with high-dimensional or sparse input features. This could help further validate the scalability and robustness of the approach.

Overall, the paper makes a significant contribution to the field of interpretable machine learning by enhancing the capabilities of Neural Additive Models. The LA-NAM model represents an important step forward in developing more transparent and trustworthy deep learning systems, with potential applications in a wide range of domains.

Conclusion

This paper presents an innovative Bayesian approach to improving the transparency and capabilities of Neural Additive Models (NAMs). By developing Laplace-Approximated NAMs (LA-NAMs), the researchers have augmented standard NAMs with the ability to provide calibrated uncertainty estimates, perform automated feature selection, and identify important feature interactions.

The empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of LA-NAMs on a variety of datasets, including challenging real-world medical prediction tasks. This suggests that the Bayesian enhancements can make NAMs more powerful and useful in practical applications, where interpretability and reliability are crucial.

The paper's contributions represent an important step forward in the field of interpretable machine learning, paving the way for the development of more transparent and trustworthy deep learning systems. As AI continues to play an increasingly prominent role in decision-making, advancements like LA-NAMs will be crucial for ensuring that these systems are reliable, accountable, and aligned with human values.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧠

Total Score

0

Improving Neural Additive Models with Bayesian Principles

Kouroche Bouchiat, Alexander Immer, Hugo Y`eche, Gunnar Ratsch, Vincent Fortuin

Neural additive models (NAMs) enhance the transparency of deep neural networks by handling input features in separate additive sub-networks. However, they lack inherent mechanisms that provide calibrated uncertainties and enable selection of relevant features and interactions. Approaching NAMs from a Bayesian perspective, we augment them in three primary ways, namely by a) providing credible intervals for the individual additive sub-networks; b) estimating the marginal likelihood to perform an implicit selection of features via an empirical Bayes procedure; and c) facilitating the ranking of feature pairs as candidates for second-order interaction in fine-tuned models. In particular, we develop Laplace-approximated NAMs (LA-NAMs), which show improved empirical performance on tabular datasets and challenging real-world medical tasks.

Read more

5/30/2024

Hierarchical Neural Additive Models for Interpretable Demand Forecasts
Total Score

0

Hierarchical Neural Additive Models for Interpretable Demand Forecasts

Leif Feddersen, Catherine Cleophas

Demand forecasts are the crucial basis for numerous business decisions, ranging from inventory management to strategic facility planning. While machine learning (ML) approaches offer accuracy gains, their interpretability and acceptance are notoriously lacking. Addressing this dilemma, we introduce Hierarchical Neural Additive Models for time series (HNAM). HNAM expands upon Neural Additive Models (NAM) by introducing a time-series specific additive model with a level and interacting covariate components. Covariate interactions are only allowed according to a user-specified interaction hierarchy. For example, weekday effects may be estimated independently of other covariates, whereas a holiday effect may depend on the weekday and an additional promotion may depend on both former covariates that are lower in the interaction hierarchy. Thereby, HNAM yields an intuitive forecasting interface in which analysts can observe the contribution for each known covariate. We evaluate the proposed approach and benchmark its performance against other state-of-the-art machine learning and statistical models extensively on real-world retail data. The results reveal that HNAM offers competitive prediction performance whilst providing plausible explanations.

Read more

4/8/2024

Implicit Generative Prior for Bayesian Neural Networks
Total Score

0

Implicit Generative Prior for Bayesian Neural Networks

Yijia Liu, Xiao Wang

Predictive uncertainty quantification is crucial for reliable decision-making in various applied domains. Bayesian neural networks offer a powerful framework for this task. However, defining meaningful priors and ensuring computational efficiency remain significant challenges, especially for complex real-world applications. This paper addresses these challenges by proposing a novel neural adaptive empirical Bayes (NA-EB) framework. NA-EB leverages a class of implicit generative priors derived from low-dimensional distributions. This allows for efficient handling of complex data structures and effective capture of underlying relationships in real-world datasets. The proposed NA-EB framework combines variational inference with a gradient ascent algorithm. This enables simultaneous hyperparameter selection and approximation of the posterior distribution, leading to improved computational efficiency. We establish the theoretical foundation of the framework through posterior and classification consistency. We demonstrate the practical applications of our framework through extensive evaluations on a variety of tasks, including the two-spiral problem, regression, 10 UCI datasets, and image classification tasks on both MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets. The results of our experiments highlight the superiority of our proposed framework over existing methods, such as sparse variational Bayesian and generative models, in terms of prediction accuracy and uncertainty quantification.

Read more

4/30/2024

Explainable Automatic Grading with Neural Additive Models
Total Score

0

Explainable Automatic Grading with Neural Additive Models

Aubrey Condor, Zachary Pardos

The use of automatic short answer grading (ASAG) models may help alleviate the time burden of grading while encouraging educators to frequently incorporate open-ended items in their curriculum. However, current state-of-the-art ASAG models are large neural networks (NN) often described as black box, providing no explanation for which characteristics of an input are important for the produced output. This inexplicable nature can be frustrating to teachers and students when trying to interpret, or learn from an automatically-generated grade. To create a powerful yet intelligible ASAG model, we experiment with a type of model called a Neural Additive Model that combines the performance of a NN with the explainability of an additive model. We use a Knowledge Integration (KI) framework from the learning sciences to guide feature engineering to create inputs that reflect whether a student includes certain ideas in their response. We hypothesize that indicating the inclusion (or exclusion) of predefined ideas as features will be sufficient for the NAM to have good predictive power and interpretability, as this may guide a human scorer using a KI rubric. We compare the performance of the NAM with another explainable model, logistic regression, using the same features, and to a non-explainable neural model, DeBERTa, that does not require feature engineering.

Read more

5/2/2024