Increasing Trust in Language Models through the Reuse of Verified Circuits
2402.02619
0
0
💬
Abstract
Language Models (LMs) are increasingly used for a wide range of prediction tasks, but their training can often neglect rare edge cases, reducing their reliability. Here, we define a stringent standard of trustworthiness whereby the task algorithm and circuit implementation must be verified, accounting for edge cases, with no known failure modes. We show that a transformer model can be trained to meet this standard if built using mathematically and logically specified frameworks. In this paper, we fully verify a model for n-digit integer addition. To exhibit the reusability of verified modules, we insert the trained integer addition model into an untrained model and train the combined model to perform both addition and subtraction. We find extensive reuse of the addition circuits for both tasks, easing verification of the more complex subtractor model. We discuss how inserting verified task modules into LMs can leverage model reuse to improve verifiability and trustworthiness of language models built using them. The reuse of verified circuits reduces the effort to verify more complex composite models which we believe to be a significant step towards safety of language models.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Language models are increasingly used for a wide range of prediction tasks, but their training can often neglect rare edge cases, reducing their reliability.
- This paper proposes a stringent standard of trustworthiness where the task algorithm and circuit implementation must be verified, accounting for edge cases, with no known failure modes.
- The researchers show that a transformer model can be trained to meet this standard using mathematically and logically specified frameworks.
- The paper focuses on verifying a model for n-digit integer addition and demonstrates how the verified addition circuits can be reused to train a combined model for both addition and subtraction.
Plain English Explanation
Language models, such as those used in natural language processing, are very powerful tools that can be applied to a wide variety of prediction tasks. However, these models can sometimes struggle with rare or unusual cases, which can reduce their reliability.
In this paper, the researchers propose a new standard for making language models more trustworthy. They say that not only should the model's algorithm be verified to work correctly, but the actual circuits used to implement the model should also be verified, taking into account all possible edge cases and ensuring there are no known failure modes.
The researchers show that it is possible to train a transformer model using mathematical and logical frameworks to meet this high standard of trustworthiness. As a demonstration, they fully verify a model for adding n-digit integers.
To show how this verified module can be reused, the researchers then insert the trained integer addition model into an untrained model and train the combined model to perform both addition and subtraction. They find that the verified addition circuits can be extensively reused for the subtraction task, which helps to simplify the verification of the more complex subtractor model.
The researchers believe that this approach of inserting verified task modules into language models can help improve the overall verifiability and trustworthiness of these powerful AI systems. By reusing verified circuits, the effort required to verify more complex composite models is reduced, which they see as an important step towards making language models safer and more reliable.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a framework for training language models to meet a stringent standard of trustworthiness, where the task algorithm and circuit implementation are fully verified to account for edge cases and have no known failure modes.
The researchers demonstrate this approach by training a transformer model to perform n-digit integer addition, a task that can be mathematically and logically specified. They use a framework called VERIFAI to verify the correctness of the addition circuits, ensuring the model has no known failure modes.
To exhibit the reusability of the verified addition module, the researchers insert it into an untrained model and train the combined model to perform both addition and subtraction. They find that the verified addition circuits can be extensively reused for the subtraction task, reducing the effort required to verify the more complex subtractor model.
This approach of inserting verified task modules into language models is proposed as a way to leverage model reuse to improve the verifiability and trustworthiness of language models built using them. By starting with verified building blocks, the researchers believe the overall effort to verify more complex composite models can be significantly reduced, which they see as an important step towards ensuring the safety of language models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach to improving the trustworthiness of language models by verifying the correctness of the underlying task algorithms and circuit implementations. This is an important step forward, as language models are increasingly being used in high-stakes applications where their reliability and safety are critical.
One potential limitation of the approach is that it may be challenging to apply the same level of rigorous verification to more complex or open-ended language tasks, such as open-ended dialogue. The researchers acknowledge this, and suggest that their approach may be most applicable to more well-defined, mathematically-grounded tasks like the integer addition example presented in the paper.
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential computational and training overhead that may be required to achieve this level of verification. Incorporating verified modules into language models could increase the complexity and training time of the overall system, which may be a practical concern for real-world deployment.
Despite these potential limitations, the researchers' approach represents an important step forward in the quest to build more trustworthy and reliable language models. By focusing on verifiability at the circuit level, they are addressing a fundamental challenge in ensuring the safety and robustness of these powerful AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel framework for training language models to meet a stringent standard of trustworthiness, where the task algorithm and circuit implementation are fully verified to account for edge cases and have no known failure modes.
The researchers demonstrate this approach by training a transformer model to perform n-digit integer addition, and then show how the verified addition circuits can be reused to train a combined model for both addition and subtraction. This approach of inserting verified task modules into language models is proposed as a way to leverage model reuse to improve the verifiability and trustworthiness of language models built using them.
While the approach may be most applicable to well-defined, mathematically-grounded tasks, the researchers' work represents an important step forward in the quest to build more reliable and safe language models. By focusing on verifiability at the circuit level, they are addressing a fundamental challenge in ensuring the robustness of these powerful AI systems, which will be crucial as they become increasingly integrated into high-stakes applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Circuit Component Reuse Across Tasks in Transformer Language Models
Jack Merullo, Carsten Eickhoff, Ellie Pavlick
0
0
Recent work in mechanistic interpretability has shown that behaviors in language models can be successfully reverse-engineered through circuit analysis. A common criticism, however, is that each circuit is task-specific, and thus such analysis cannot contribute to understanding the models at a higher level. In this work, we present evidence that insights (both low-level findings about specific heads and higher-level findings about general algorithms) can indeed generalize across tasks. Specifically, we study the circuit discovered in Wang et al. (2022) for the Indirect Object Identification (IOI) task and 1.) show that it reproduces on a larger GPT2 model, and 2.) that it is mostly reused to solve a seemingly different task: Colored Objects (Ippolito & Callison-Burch, 2023). We provide evidence that the process underlying both tasks is functionally very similar, and contains about a 78% overlap in in-circuit attention heads. We further present a proof-of-concept intervention experiment, in which we adjust four attention heads in middle layers in order to 'repair' the Colored Objects circuit and make it behave like the IOI circuit. In doing so, we boost accuracy from 49.6% to 93.7% on the Colored Objects task and explain most sources of error. The intervention affects downstream attention heads in specific ways predicted by their interactions in the IOI circuit, indicating that this subcircuit behavior is invariant to the different task inputs. Overall, our results provide evidence that it may yet be possible to explain large language models' behavior in terms of a relatively small number of interpretable task-general algorithmic building blocks and computational components.
5/7/2024
CaLM: Contrasting Large and Small Language Models to Verify Grounded Generation
I-Hung Hsu, Zifeng Wang, Long T. Le, Lesly Miculicich, Nanyun Peng, Chen-Yu Lee, Tomas Pfister
0
0
Grounded generation aims to equip language models (LMs) with the ability to produce more credible and accountable responses by accurately citing verifiable sources. However, existing methods, by either feeding LMs with raw or preprocessed materials, remain prone to errors. To address this, we introduce CaLM, a novel verification framework. CaLM leverages the insight that a robust grounded response should be consistent with information derived solely from its cited sources. Our framework empowers smaller LMs, which rely less on parametric memory and excel at processing relevant information given a query, to validate the output of larger LMs. Larger LM responses that closely align with the smaller LMs' output, which relies exclusively on cited documents, are verified. Responses showing discrepancies are iteratively refined through a feedback loop. Experiments on three open-domain question-answering datasets demonstrate significant performance gains of 1.5% to 7% absolute average without any required model fine-tuning.
6/26/2024
💬
Investigating Symbolic Capabilities of Large Language Models
Neisarg Dave, Daniel Kifer, C. Lee Giles, Ankur Mali
0
0
Prompting techniques have significantly enhanced the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) across various complex tasks, including reasoning, planning, and solving math word problems. However, most research has predominantly focused on language-based reasoning and word problems, often overlooking the potential of LLMs in handling symbol-based calculations and reasoning. This study aims to bridge this gap by rigorously evaluating LLMs on a series of symbolic tasks, such as addition, multiplication, modulus arithmetic, numerical precision, and symbolic counting. Our analysis encompasses eight LLMs, including four enterprise-grade and four open-source models, of which three have been pre-trained on mathematical tasks. The assessment framework is anchored in Chomsky's Hierarchy, providing a robust measure of the computational abilities of these models. The evaluation employs minimally explained prompts alongside the zero-shot Chain of Thoughts technique, allowing models to navigate the solution process autonomously. The findings reveal a significant decline in LLMs' performance on context-free and context-sensitive symbolic tasks as the complexity, represented by the number of symbols, increases. Notably, even the fine-tuned GPT3.5 exhibits only marginal improvements, mirroring the performance trends observed in other models. Across the board, all models demonstrated a limited generalization ability on these symbol-intensive tasks. This research underscores LLMs' challenges with increasing symbolic complexity and highlights the need for specialized training, memory and architectural adjustments to enhance their proficiency in symbol-based reasoning tasks.
5/24/2024
💬
Small Language Models Need Strong Verifiers to Self-Correct Reasoning
Yunxiang Zhang, Muhammad Khalifa, Lajanugen Logeswaran, Jaekyeom Kim, Moontae Lee, Honglak Lee, Lu Wang
0
0
Self-correction has emerged as a promising solution to boost the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs), where LLMs refine their solutions using self-generated critiques that pinpoint the errors. This work explores whether small (<= 13B) language models (LMs) have the ability of self-correction on reasoning tasks with minimal inputs from stronger LMs. We propose a novel pipeline that prompts smaller LMs to collect self-correction data that supports the training of self-refinement abilities. First, we leverage correct solutions to guide the model in critiquing their incorrect responses. Second, the generated critiques, after filtering, are used for supervised fine-tuning of the self-correcting reasoner through solution refinement. Our experimental results show improved self-correction abilities of two models on five datasets spanning math and commonsense reasoning, with notable performance gains when paired with a strong GPT-4-based verifier, though limitations are identified when using a weak self-verifier for determining when to correct.
6/7/2024